arrow left
arrow right
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-200 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (INanie, Stele Gar number, end address): "Thomas E, Miller, Esq. (Bar No. 087821) FoR COURT USE ONLY THE MILLER LAW 235 Montgomery St., Suite 930, San Francisco, CA 94104 ELECTRONICALLY TELEPHONE NO: (415) 437-1800 — FAXNO (Options (415) 437-O177 EMAIL AGURESS (Ontong: tmiler@constructiondefects.com F I L E D ATTORNEY FOR lames: Plaintiff, 88 Townsend Steet Owners Association, Superior Court of California, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO County of San Francisco stazeraooness: 400 McAllister Street nts AS OCT 31 2014 crrvanozp cons San Francisco, CA 94102 Clerk of the Court sranconawe: Civic Center BY: ROMY RISK Deputy Cle PLAINTIFFPETITIONER: 88 Townsend Street Owners Association DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: 699 Second Development, LLC, et al. CASE NUMBER: CGC-13-531203 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE jubee: DEFT. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OR OTHER PARTY SEEKING RELIEF You must file a request for dismissal of the entire case within 45 days afier the date of the settlement if the settlement is unconditional. You must file dismissal of the entire case within 45 days after the date specified in item 1b below if the settlement is conditional. Unless you file a dismissal within the required time or have shown good cause before the time for dismissal has. expired why the case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the entire case. To the court, all parties, and any arbitrator or other court-connected ADR neutral invelved in this case: 1. This entire case has bean settled. The settlement is: a. CCC] Unconditional. A request for dismissal will be filed within 45 days after the date of the settlement, Date of seltiement: b. Conditional. The settlement agreement conditions dismissal of this matter on the satisfactory completion of specified terms that are not to be performed within 45 days of the date of the settlement. A request for dismissal will be filed no later than (date): November 21, 2014 2. Date initial pleading fled: May 6, 2013 3. Next scheduled hearing or conference: a. Purpose: Trial b. (1) Date: November 10, 2014 (2) Time: 9:30 a.m. (3) Department: 206 4, Tal date: November 16, 2014 a. C1 No trial date set. b. (277 (1) Date: November 10, 2014 (2) Time: 9:30 a.m, (3) Department: 206 {declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Is true and correct. Date: October 31, 2014 ef PCA tf) Thomas E. Miller, Esq. > i fee. A, Lt Le {TYRE OR PRINT NAME OF arronney ["""] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) SIGNATURE)” Page (of? Form Adopied for Mandatory Use Gel. Rules of Cour, ula 3.1988 ame elon fo Mandi NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE enn costintoa gov CM-200 Rev. January 4, 200%]CM-200 CARE NUMBER: CGC-13-531203 PLAINTIFFIPETIONER: 88 Townsend Street Owners Association DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: 699 Second Development, LLC, et al. PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case if you ere a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service.) 4. lam atleast 18 years old and not a party te this action. | arn a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): 2. [served a copy of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid and (check one): a Co dapasited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. tb. [7] placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which | am readily familiar. On the same day correspondance is placed for collection and malling, itis deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Settiement of Entire Case was mailed: a. on (date): b. from (city and state}: 4. ‘The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a, Name of person served: c. Name of person served: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: ‘State and zip code: b, Name of person served: d. Name of person served: Sweei address: Street addrass: City: City: State and zip cade: State and zip code: [7] Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030{P).} §. Number of pages attached (declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Callfomia that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGNATLIAE CF DECLARANT} CM-20R1 Rov, January *, 2007] NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE Page a ofSo oo RO Rw ON RR MN RN RN eet th mht kt eo WF A £ OB SB B&F SB 6 we BW A Hh BR BH NM PROOF OF SERVICE IC.CP. Section 1013A(3)] STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO lam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. | am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 930, San Francisco, CA 94104. On October Bt » 2014, I served the documents described as: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE on the interested parties in this action as follows: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST PERSONAL SERVICE - I placed the copies in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above and caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to counsel for the parties in this action. BY ELECTRONIC MAIL. I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by electronic mail to the email addresses indicated on the attached service list. X_. BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE ~ Via Nexis Lexis File and Serve Express. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on October 3/ , 2014 at San Francisco, California. LINDA A. beds ale PROOF OF SERVICESO 88 Ne pet BF OS Sergey mets Teer SS _ we 14 88 Townsend Street Owners Association v. 699 Second Development, LLC, et al. San Francisco Superior Court — Case No. CGC-13-831203 SERVICE LIST Steven M. Cvitanovic, Esq. Jessica M. Lassere Ryland, Esq. HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 282-7608 / Fax: 415-546-7505 scvilanovic@hbblaw.com JLassereR yland@HBBLAW.com Attorneys for Defendanis 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT, LLC; and CANNON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. Steward D. Reid, Esq. Kevin J. Gillispie, Esq. WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 1401 Willow Pass Rd., Suite 700 Concord, CA 94520-7982 Tel: (925) 222-3400 / Fax: (925) 356-8250 sreid@wshblaw.com kgillispie@wshbiaw.com Attorneys for Defendanis 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT, LLC; and CANNON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. David M. Levy Courtney B. McFate VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN LLP 1600 South Main Plaza Ste 325 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 934-6102 dlevy@vanlevylaw.com cmefate@vanlevylaw.com viorgensen@vanlevylaw.com idesilva@vanlevylaw.com Attorneys for Sternberg Benjamin Architects Gregory G. Dahl Law Offices of Timothy R. Wagner 1655 Grant St., Suite 800-B Concord, CA 94520 (925) 681-3600 / Fax: (866) 386-1186 Gregorve.dahl@aig.com Associated Attorneys for Blomberg Building Materials, Inc. DBA Blomberg Window Systems James J. Ficenee Archer Norris 2033 North Main Street, Suite 806 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925-930-6600 / Fax: 925-930-6620 ificenec@archernorris.com Attorneys for Marvin Windows, Inc. Colin W. Larson, Esq. Bledsoe, Cathcart, Diestel, Pederen & Treppa LU 601 California St., 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-2805 (415) 981-541 14415) 981-0352 clarson@bledsoelaw.com smedonald@bledsoelaw.com atrinidad@bledsoelaw.com Attorneys for Blomberg Building Materials, Inc. DBA Blomberg Window Systems SERVICE LIST