On September 27, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Encore Bank,
and
Berry, Allen L,
Mccord, Joseph D,
Taylor, Robert G,
Taylor, Robert G Ii (Personal Representative Of The Estate Of,
for BREACH OF CONTRACT
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
p- Filed 13 August 16 P1:30
(1A)
Chris Daniel - District Clerk
Harris Coun
ED101J017658686
By: Marcella Hill
CAUSE NO. 2010-63264
CADENCE BANK.
f/k/a ENCORE BANK IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff,
Vv,
OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ALLEN L. BERRY;
JOSEPH D. MCCORD,
and ROBERT G. TAYLOR, II,
Defendants. § 1524 JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER
After considering Plaintiff Cadence Bank f/k/a Encore Bank’s First Amended
Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment and No Evidence Motion for Summary
Judgment, the pleadings, the response, the affidavits, the other evidence on file, and the
arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion the Motion is well-taken and should be
GRANTED. Therefore, the Court
ORDERS that Plaintiffs First Amended Traditional Motion for Summary
Judgment and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
SIGNED this day of JAN 2.9 2016 , 2013.
ir 2H 14
HON. ROBERT K. SCHAFFE:
RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM
This instrument is of poor qualtiy
at the time of imaging
Document Filed Date
January 29, 2014
Case Filing Date
September 27, 2010
Category
BREACH OF CONTRACT
Status
Case On Appeal - Civil
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
p- Filed 13 August 16 P1:30 (1A) Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris Coun ED101J017658686 By: Marcella Hill CAUSE NO. 2010-63264 CADENCE BANK. f/k/a ENCORE BANK IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, Vv, OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ALLEN L. BERRY; JOSEPH D. MCCORD, and ROBERT G. TAYLOR, II, Defendants. § 1524 JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER After considering Plaintiff Cadence Bank f/k/a Encore Bank’s First Amended Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment, the pleadings, the response, the affidavits, the other evidence on file, and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion the Motion is well-taken and should be GRANTED. Therefore, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs First Amended Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. SIGNED this day of JAN 2.9 2016 , 2013. ir 2H 14 HON. ROBERT K. SCHAFFE: RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM This instrument is of poor qualtiy at the time of imaging