Preview
MONI
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Feb-19-2015 4:45 pm
Case Number: CPF-14-514004
Filing Date: Feb-19-2015 4:44
Filed by: DANIAL LEMIRE
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04799648
ORDER
IN RE: SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
001004799648
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Co nN DW FF WYN
NY MW YN NY NR NN RF ee we Se ee Be Be Se eS
ont A mw RB Oe NSF SO wm DH FF WY | Oo
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
JAMES J. DRAGNA (SBN 91492) heel .
COLIN C, WEST (SBN 184095} » San Francisco County Superior Court
THOMAS S. HIXSON (SBN 193033)
Three Embarcadero Center FEB 19 2015
San Francisco, California 94111-4067 QURT
Telephone: 415.393.2000 CLERK OF 7 o
Facsimile: 415.393.2286 BY Deputy Clerk
Quinn Emanvel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
JOHN B. QUINN (SBN 90378)
ERIC J. EMANUEL (SBN 102187)
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone: 213.443.3000
Facsimile: 213.443.3100
MARCIA SCULLY (SBN 80648)
HEATHER C. BEATTY (SBN 161907)
JOSEPH VANDERHORST (SBN 106441)
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
700 North Alameda Street
Los Angeles, California 90012-2944
Telephone: 213.217.6000
Facsimile: 213.217.6980
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California [GOVERNMENT CODE § 6103]
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER No. CPF-14-514004
AUTHORITY, a {
JOINT STIPULATION AND [ ]
Petitioner and Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE
v. Action Filed: May 30, 2014
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF Trial Date: Not Yet Set
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; ET AL.,
Respondents and Defendants.
STIPULATION AND [2B@PSEED] ORDER STAYING CASE
eye—
Co wo NI DH WH FF YW NY
wh NM RY NY NY NY NY NY NR fF Se Re Se eS Se _— oe
BNR RR BB EBS GRA RFE BH BS
Respondent and Defendant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(“MWD”), Petitioner and Plaintiff San Diego County Water Authority (“SDCWA”), and Real
Parties in Interest City of Torrance, Three Valleys Municipal Water District, West Basin
Municipal Water District, Foothill Municipal Water District, Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District, City of Los Angeles, Eastern Municipal Water District, Western Municipal Water
District, and Municipal Water District of Orange County (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby
submit the following stipulation and proposed order:
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2014, SDCWA filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and
Complaint for Determination of Invalidity, Damages and Declaratory Relief (“the Complaint”) in
this action; and
WHEREAS, there are currently two cases titled San Diego County Water Authority v.
Metropolitan Water District et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-10-510830 and
San Diego County Water Authority v. Metropolitan Water District et al., San Francisco Superior
Court Case No. CPF-12-512466 (the “2010 and 2012 Actions”), pending before the Honorable
Curtis E.A. Karnow in the Complex Department (Department 304) of the Superior Court in and
for the County of San Francisco, which involve the same parties and raise certain issues that are
factually and legally nearly identical to this action; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, because this action raises issues that are factually and
legally nearly identical to those at issue in the 20/0 and 2012 Actions, it is in the interests of
judicial economy and conservation of the scarce resources of the California courts and the Parties
that this action be stayed; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the above-captioned action should be stayed for the
present time, with each party reserving its right to move to lift the stay at a later date.
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES THAT:
The above-captioned action should be stayed.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASEDated: Foooary U1) Jo IT
Dated:
Dated:
Dated:
4 VAN NEST LLP
By?
J W. KEKER
Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER
AUTHORITY
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By: COLIN C. WEST
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CITY OF TORRANCE
By: PATRICK Q, SULLIVAN
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF TORRANCE
BRUNICK, McRLHANEY & KENNEDY
By: STEVEN M. KENNEDY
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
2
STIPULATION AND [PRSOPOSEB] ORDER STAYING CASEoe UN DW
10
ul
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
paws 2 /18 [2019
Dated:
Dated:
By:
By:
By:
By:
2
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JOHN W. KEKER
Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER
AUTHORITY
MORGANL.LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
—
COLIN C. WEST
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.
CITY OF TORRANCE
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF TORRANCE
BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY
STEVEN M, KENNEDY
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
STIPULATION AND [BR@POSER] ORDER STAYING CASE0 ew ND HW BF WN
N NR NY YN NN DN He me me
oe UA HW BF BN fF SG wm DDH BF WN |
Dated:
Dated:
Dated: <2 /3 2015
Dated:
By:
By:
By:
By:
2
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JOHN W. KEKER
Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER
AUTHORITY
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
COLIN C. WEST
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CITY OF TORRANCE
Pt A 2
a
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF TORRANCE
BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY
STEVEN M. KENNEDY
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
STIPULATION AND [PROPSSED] ORDER STAYING CASECo eo IN KH mH FF YN
mw RM NR YN NN = = _
BRR RFRPERBEBSEBWARBREER ZS
Dated: KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
By:
JOHN W. KEKER
Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER
AUTHORITY
Dated: MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By: COLIN C. WEST
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Dated: CITY OF TORRANCE
By: PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
Attomeys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF TORRANCE
Dated: 7 / a / 2OIB BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
2
STIPULATION AND [PRGPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASEoo tT DA HW PF WN
oC
i
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“ut aps lis
Dated:
Dated:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By:
By:
By:
LEMIEUX & O’NEILL
CHRISTINE CARSON
Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties
in Interest
WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT,
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ALESHIRE & WYDNER, LLP
PATRICIA J. QUILIZAPA
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF
ORANGE COUNTY
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER &
WILSON
AMRIT 8. KULKARNI
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
C4
exordoen| ORDER
3
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed.
“yy
Judge mere \
STIPULATION AND [RR@B@@ED] ORDER STAYING CASE
uwom YN DH HD PF WN
NN NHN NY NY NY YN NHN HN Dw eet
on A WA FF BN KF GO we WM DH RB WHY & DS
Dated:
Dated: 2/3/2015
Dated:
~ LEMIEUX & O’NEILL
By: CHRISTINE CARSON
By:
By:
Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties
in Interest
WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT,
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ALESHIRE & WYD) LLP
J. QUILIZAPA
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF
ORANGE COUNTY
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER &
WILSON
AMRIT 8S. KULKARNI
Attomeys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATEN: \
Judge of “ee Court \
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE26
Dated: LEMIEUX & O’NEILL
By: CHRISTINE CARSON
Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties
in Interest
WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT,
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Dated: ALESHIRE & WYDNER, LLP
By: PATRICIA J. QUILIZAPA
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF
ORANGE COUNTY
Dated: Febrvary tl, 2015 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER &
WILSON
By: Trop, S. KULKARNI U
Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: B 14 zee . za ——
Judge df the Superior Court
3
STIPULATION AND [PREPESBD] ORDER STAYING CASE
Related Content
in San Francisco County
Ruling
PEOPLE CENTER, INC. D/B/A RIPPLING, A DELAWARE VS. ASURE PAYROLL TAX MANAGEMENT LLC, A DELAWARE LLC ET AL
Jul 11, 2024 |
CGC24615613
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Thursday, July 11, 2024, Line 15. PLAINTIFF PEOPLE CENTER, INC. D/B/A RIPPLING's Motion For Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling's motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 1:30 p.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
A & A GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INC., A VS. ARLENE S. TASIM ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 |
CGC23609755
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Friday, July 12, 2024, Line 12. DEFENDANT ARLENE TASIM AND ALI TASIM'S Motion For Sanctions Against A A General Building Construction Inc. Pursuant To Code Of Civil Procedure Section 1281.99. Defendants and Cross-Complainants' unopposed Motion for Sanctions in the amount of $8350.00 is granted (CCP section 1281.99), payment to be made within 30 days of the filing of this order. Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person should report to Dept. 301. However, anyone intending to appear remotely should use the regular Zoom information for Dept. 302's Law & Motion Calendar for 9:30 a.m. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RCE)
Ruling
YOLANDA JONES ET AL VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 |
CGC23609805
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 10. 2 - DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS, LLC's MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST Amended COMPLAINT. Off calendar. The Quezada declaration fails to show that the parties met and conferred "in person, by telephone, or by video conference" in compliance with CCP 435.5. The parties are ordered to comply with the code. The response to the complaint is now due August 7, 2024. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
EDWARD WESTERMAN VS. FTI CONSULTING, INC. ET AL
Jul 09, 2024 |
CGC24615152
Matter on the Law & Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 9, 2024, Line 12. PLAINTIFF EDWARD WESTERMAN's Motion To Seal. Plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal is granted. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
CLEAR HOMES LLC, A NEW MEXICO LIMITED LIABILITY VS. BRENDAN MICHAEL WEE ET AL
Jul 11, 2024 |
CGC23607972
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 11, 2024 line 2. DEFENDANT BRENDAN WEE, ERIKA HILTON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is Off Calendar - Per request of moving party. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.
Ruling
ELIANE DOS SANTOS VITAL, AN INDIVIDUAL ET AL VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL
Jul 12, 2024 |
CGC22601133
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, Jul-12-2024, Line 2, PLAINTIFFS ELIANE DOS SANTOS VITAL, AN INDIVIDUAL, and WIDES VITAL DA SILVA'S, AN INDIVIDUAL, Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production Of Documents, Set Two. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Parties to appear if the motion remains unresolved. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)
Ruling
Y.P. VS. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 |
CGC24613065
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 12. DEFENDANT EARL IGNACIO AND WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'s Motion To Compel Arbitration. Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Earl Ignacio's motion to compel arbitration and stay is denied. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
MARY ELIZABETH LEMASTERS VS. SCHOENBERG FAMILY LAW GROUP P.C. ET AL
Jul 09, 2024 |
CGC22600572
Matter on the Law & Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 9, 2024, Line 4. PLAINTIFF MARY LEMASTERS' MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Hearing required. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
JOHN P BERNARD VS. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 |
CGC23608339
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 8. PLAINTIFF JOHN BERNARD's Motion For Award Of Attorneys Fees, Costs, And Expenses. Off calendar for noncompliance with Local Rule 2.7(B) (courtesy copies). The motion may be re-set for a Mon.-Thurs. after July 24, with papers to bear new hearing date. In meantime, counsel shall meet and confer to resolve their differences. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Preview
MONI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-19-2015 4:45 pm Case Number: CPF-14-514004 Filing Date: Feb-19-2015 4:44 Filed by: DANIAL LEMIRE Juke Box: 001 Image: 04799648 ORDER IN RE: SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 001004799648 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Co nN DW FF WYN NY MW YN NY NR NN RF ee we Se ee Be Be Se eS ont A mw RB Oe NSF SO wm DH FF WY | Oo Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP JAMES J. DRAGNA (SBN 91492) heel . COLIN C, WEST (SBN 184095} » San Francisco County Superior Court THOMAS S. HIXSON (SBN 193033) Three Embarcadero Center FEB 19 2015 San Francisco, California 94111-4067 QURT Telephone: 415.393.2000 CLERK OF 7 o Facsimile: 415.393.2286 BY Deputy Clerk Quinn Emanvel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP JOHN B. QUINN (SBN 90378) ERIC J. EMANUEL (SBN 102187) 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: 213.443.3000 Facsimile: 213.443.3100 MARCIA SCULLY (SBN 80648) HEATHER C. BEATTY (SBN 161907) JOSEPH VANDERHORST (SBN 106441) The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 700 North Alameda Street Los Angeles, California 90012-2944 Telephone: 213.217.6000 Facsimile: 213.217.6980 Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES Metropolitan Water District of Southern California [GOVERNMENT CODE § 6103] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER No. CPF-14-514004 AUTHORITY, a { JOINT STIPULATION AND [ ] Petitioner and Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE v. Action Filed: May 30, 2014 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF Trial Date: Not Yet Set SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; ET AL., Respondents and Defendants. STIPULATION AND [2B@PSEED] ORDER STAYING CASE eye— Co wo NI DH WH FF YW NY wh NM RY NY NY NY NY NY NR fF Se Re Se eS Se _— oe BNR RR BB EBS GRA RFE BH BS Respondent and Defendant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD”), Petitioner and Plaintiff San Diego County Water Authority (“SDCWA”), and Real Parties in Interest City of Torrance, Three Valleys Municipal Water District, West Basin Municipal Water District, Foothill Municipal Water District, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, City of Los Angeles, Eastern Municipal Water District, Western Municipal Water District, and Municipal Water District of Orange County (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order: WHEREAS, on May 30, 2014, SDCWA filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Determination of Invalidity, Damages and Declaratory Relief (“the Complaint”) in this action; and WHEREAS, there are currently two cases titled San Diego County Water Authority v. Metropolitan Water District et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-10-510830 and San Diego County Water Authority v. Metropolitan Water District et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-12-512466 (the “2010 and 2012 Actions”), pending before the Honorable Curtis E.A. Karnow in the Complex Department (Department 304) of the Superior Court in and for the County of San Francisco, which involve the same parties and raise certain issues that are factually and legally nearly identical to this action; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, because this action raises issues that are factually and legally nearly identical to those at issue in the 20/0 and 2012 Actions, it is in the interests of judicial economy and conservation of the scarce resources of the California courts and the Parties that this action be stayed; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the above-captioned action should be stayed for the present time, with each party reserving its right to move to lift the stay at a later date. IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES THAT: The above-captioned action should be stayed. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASEDated: Foooary U1) Jo IT Dated: Dated: Dated: 4 VAN NEST LLP By? J W. KEKER Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: COLIN C. WEST Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITY OF TORRANCE By: PATRICK Q, SULLIVAN Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF TORRANCE BRUNICK, McRLHANEY & KENNEDY By: STEVEN M. KENNEDY Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2 STIPULATION AND [PRSOPOSEB] ORDER STAYING CASEoe UN DW 10 ul 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: paws 2 /18 [2019 Dated: Dated: By: By: By: By: 2 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JOHN W. KEKER Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MORGANL.LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP — COLIN C. WEST Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. CITY OF TORRANCE PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF TORRANCE BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY STEVEN M, KENNEDY Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT STIPULATION AND [BR@POSER] ORDER STAYING CASE0 ew ND HW BF WN N NR NY YN NN DN He me me oe UA HW BF BN fF SG wm DDH BF WN | Dated: Dated: Dated: <2 /3 2015 Dated: By: By: By: By: 2 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JOHN W. KEKER Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP COLIN C. WEST Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITY OF TORRANCE Pt A 2 a PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF TORRANCE BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY STEVEN M. KENNEDY Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT STIPULATION AND [PROPSSED] ORDER STAYING CASECo eo IN KH mH FF YN mw RM NR YN NN = = _ BRR RFRPERBEBSEBWARBREER ZS Dated: KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: JOHN W. KEKER Attorneys Petitioner and Plaintiff SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Dated: MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: COLIN C. WEST Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Dated: CITY OF TORRANCE By: PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN Attomeys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF TORRANCE Dated: 7 / a / 2OIB BRUNICK, McELHANEY & KENNEDY Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2 STIPULATION AND [PRGPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASEoo tT DA HW PF WN oC i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 “ut aps lis Dated: Dated: IT IS SO ORDERED. By: By: By: LEMIEUX & O’NEILL CHRISTINE CARSON Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties in Interest WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ALESHIRE & WYDNER, LLP PATRICIA J. QUILIZAPA Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON AMRIT 8. KULKARNI Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES C4 exordoen| ORDER 3 Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed. “yy Judge mere \ STIPULATION AND [RR@B@@ED] ORDER STAYING CASE uwom YN DH HD PF WN NN NHN NY NY NY YN NHN HN Dw eet on A WA FF BN KF GO we WM DH RB WHY & DS Dated: Dated: 2/3/2015 Dated: ~ LEMIEUX & O’NEILL By: CHRISTINE CARSON By: By: Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties in Interest WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ALESHIRE & WYD) LLP J. QUILIZAPA Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON AMRIT 8S. KULKARNI Attomeys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATEN: \ Judge of “ee Court \ 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE26 Dated: LEMIEUX & O’NEILL By: CHRISTINE CARSON Attorneys for Respondents and Real Parties in Interest WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, FOOTHILL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Dated: ALESHIRE & WYDNER, LLP By: PATRICIA J. QUILIZAPA Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Dated: Febrvary tl, 2015 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON By: Trop, S. KULKARNI U Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the above-captioned action is stayed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: B 14 zee . za —— Judge df the Superior Court 3 STIPULATION AND [PREPESBD] ORDER STAYING CASE