On January 22, 2010 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cruz, Gerardo,
and
City Masonry Inc,
for PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
Filed 10J une 1 P5:02
Loren J ackson - District Clerk
Harris Coun!
ED101) 015808365
By: Natrice Darrington
CAUSE NO. 2010-04488
GERARDO CRUZ § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CITY MASONRY, INC. 269â„¢ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER
Defendant, CITY MASONRY, INC. files this Amended Answer to
Plaintiff's Petition and would respectfully show the Court the following:
I
GENERAL DENIAL
Pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant
denies all allegations contained in the Plaintiff's pleadings and demands proof of
every fact and matter essential to the Plaintiff's case.
IL.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Answering further, without waiving the asserted general denial, Defendant would
show the following affirmative defenses:
Defendant would show that on the occasion in question Plaintiff was negligent
and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident made the basis of this suit
and any damages suffered by Plaintiff.
Defendant would show that Plaintiff has failed to mitigate his damages.
I.
DEFENSES TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND
ECONOMIC DAMAGES
Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant asserts all
provisions of Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code and all of its
appropriate subsections which limit the amount of exemplary damages which may be
awarded, if claimed, and limits recovery of medical expenses to the amount actually paid
by or on behalf
of the claimant.
Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant asserts the
limitation on recovery set forth in Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section
18.091(a) and (b) which limits awards for loss of earning capacity, if made, to net loss
after federal income tax.
IV.
DENIAL OF CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant denies that all
conditions precedent entitling Plaintiff to recovery have occurred.
Vv.
PRAYER
Defendant, CITY MASONRY, INC. prays that the Plaintiff take nothing by
reason of this suit and that the Plaintiff be discharged with his costs and that the
Defendant be granted all further relief, both general and special, at law and in
equity, to which he may show himself justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
FUL S DER, LUCERO & WOLLAM, L.L.P
Vv
RIK R. WOLLAM
TBN: 00788705
TODD C, FEDER
TBN: 00787455
1776 Yorktown, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: (713) 225-3400
Facsimile: (713) 225-3300
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the day of June, 2010 a true and correct copy
of the foregoing was sent or delivered to all parties through counsel of record
pursuant to Rule 21a T.R.C.P.
ERIK R. WOLLAM
Document Filed Date
June 01, 2010
Case Filing Date
January 22, 2010
Category
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.