arrow left
arrow right
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
  • CRUZ, GERARDO vs. CITY MASONRY INC PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filed 10J une 1 P5:02 Loren J ackson - District Clerk Harris Coun! ED101) 015808365 By: Natrice Darrington CAUSE NO. 2010-04488 GERARDO CRUZ § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS CITY MASONRY, INC. 269™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER Defendant, CITY MASONRY, INC. files this Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Petition and would respectfully show the Court the following: I GENERAL DENIAL Pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant denies all allegations contained in the Plaintiff's pleadings and demands proof of every fact and matter essential to the Plaintiff's case. IL. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Answering further, without waiving the asserted general denial, Defendant would show the following affirmative defenses: Defendant would show that on the occasion in question Plaintiff was negligent and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident made the basis of this suit and any damages suffered by Plaintiff. Defendant would show that Plaintiff has failed to mitigate his damages. I. DEFENSES TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND ECONOMIC DAMAGES Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant asserts all provisions of Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code and all of its appropriate subsections which limit the amount of exemplary damages which may be awarded, if claimed, and limits recovery of medical expenses to the amount actually paid by or on behalf of the claimant. Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant asserts the limitation on recovery set forth in Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 18.091(a) and (b) which limits awards for loss of earning capacity, if made, to net loss after federal income tax. IV. DENIAL OF CONDITIONS PRECEDENT Answering further, without waiving the foregoing, Defendant denies that all conditions precedent entitling Plaintiff to recovery have occurred. Vv. PRAYER Defendant, CITY MASONRY, INC. prays that the Plaintiff take nothing by reason of this suit and that the Plaintiff be discharged with his costs and that the Defendant be granted all further relief, both general and special, at law and in equity, to which he may show himself justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, FUL S DER, LUCERO & WOLLAM, L.L.P Vv RIK R. WOLLAM TBN: 00788705 TODD C, FEDER TBN: 00787455 1776 Yorktown, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 225-3400 Facsimile: (713) 225-3300 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the day of June, 2010 a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent or delivered to all parties through counsel of record pursuant to Rule 21a T.R.C.P. ERIK R. WOLLAM