Preview
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15™ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE
LOAN TRUST 2006-OA2 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OA2,
GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 50 2008 CA-002904,W
vs. ge 8
Zoe 8
MARIA DE RODRIGUES; ANTONIO E. PEREIRA ET AL, aps rol mal
A225 @
252
Defendants. / = g 2 a
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT a
COMES NOW the Defendant, MARIA DE RODRIGUES & ANTONIO E. PEREIRA,
by and through his undersigned attorney, and Answers the Complaint in corresponding numbered
paragraphs as follows:
1. The allegations of paragraph 1 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
2. The allegations of paragraph 2 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
3. The allegations of paragraph 3 are denied.
4. The allegations of paragraph 4 are denied..
5. The allegations of paragraph 5 are denied.
6. The allegations of paragraph 6 are admitted.
7. The allegations of paragraph 7 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
1.8. The allegations of paragraph 8 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
9. The allegations of paragraph 9 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
10. The allegations of paragraph 10 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
11. The allegations of paragraph 11 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
12. The allegations of paragraph 12 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
13. The allegations of paragraph 13 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
14. The allegations of paragraph 14 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
15. The allegations of paragraph 15 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
16. Thé allegations of paragraph 16 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
17. The allegations of paragraph 17 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
18. The allegations of paragraph 18 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
19. The allegations of paragraph 19 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
20. The allegations of paragraph 20 are unknown, and therefore, denied.
WHEREFORE the defendants, MARIO DE RODRIGUES & ANTONIO E. PEREIRA
respectfullyly pray this court to dismiss this action and for Court costs.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed by First
Class U.S. Mail to: Suly M. Espinoza, Esquire, Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Attorneys
for Plaintiff, 801 S. University Drive, Suite 500, Plantation, Florida 33324, this 28th day of
April, 2008.
(CH. D. SEAYXESQUIRE
Florida Bar No. 261211
Attorney for Def.’s RODRIGUES
Justice Building, Suite 200-N
524 South Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone: (954)463-8248
Preview
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15™ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OA2 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OA2, GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NO. 50 2008 CA-002904,W vs. ge 8 Zoe 8 MARIA DE RODRIGUES; ANTONIO E. PEREIRA ET AL, aps rol mal A225 @ 252 Defendants. / = g 2 a ANSWER TO COMPLAINT a COMES NOW the Defendant, MARIA DE RODRIGUES & ANTONIO E. PEREIRA, by and through his undersigned attorney, and Answers the Complaint in corresponding numbered paragraphs as follows: 1. The allegations of paragraph 1 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 2. The allegations of paragraph 2 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 3. The allegations of paragraph 3 are denied. 4. The allegations of paragraph 4 are denied.. 5. The allegations of paragraph 5 are denied. 6. The allegations of paragraph 6 are admitted. 7. The allegations of paragraph 7 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 1.8. The allegations of paragraph 8 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 9. The allegations of paragraph 9 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 10. The allegations of paragraph 10 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 11. The allegations of paragraph 11 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 12. The allegations of paragraph 12 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 13. The allegations of paragraph 13 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 14. The allegations of paragraph 14 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 15. The allegations of paragraph 15 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 16. Thé allegations of paragraph 16 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 17. The allegations of paragraph 17 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 18. The allegations of paragraph 18 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 19. The allegations of paragraph 19 are unknown, and therefore, denied. 20. The allegations of paragraph 20 are unknown, and therefore, denied. WHEREFORE the defendants, MARIO DE RODRIGUES & ANTONIO E. PEREIRA respectfullyly pray this court to dismiss this action and for Court costs.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed by First Class U.S. Mail to: Suly M. Espinoza, Esquire, Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Attorneys for Plaintiff, 801 S. University Drive, Suite 500, Plantation, Florida 33324, this 28th day of April, 2008. (CH. D. SEAYXESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 261211 Attorney for Def.’s RODRIGUES Justice Building, Suite 200-N 524 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954)463-8248