On December 03, 2012 a
Letter,Correspondence
was filed
involving a dispute between
Nidal Abou Trabah,
and
Shemsan Grocery A K A Deli & Grill,
Zane Munassa,
Z&N Hillside Sutphin Llc,
for Tort
in the District Court of Kings County.
Preview
BHURTEL LAW FIRM PLLC
Attorney At Law Email: richard@attorneybhurtel.com
2"
37-49 75thstreet Floor, Jackson Heights NY 11372 Phone: 718-509-6181
April 23, 2019
CENTRAL COMPLAINCE PART
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
Re: NIDAL ABOU TRABAH v. Z & N HILLSIDE/SUTPHIN LLC, et al.
Index No#: 504087/12
Dear sir/madam:
Attached please find a copy of the final disposition part order signed by the attorneys for plaintiff
and defendant on April 11, 2019 withdrawing the 2 motions both returnable on April 26, 2019.
Please note that when the undersigned attorney called the motion support part at 347-401-9249
this morning, the court clerk said the final disposition part order dated April 11, 2019 was also
signed by the judge, making appearance for these motions on April 26, 2019 unnecessary.
Therefore, please mark off the 2 motions from the calendar.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Bhurtel Law Firm PLLC/Plaintiff's attorney
By:Richard Pak, Esq.
At a Note of Issue Final Disposition Part of The Supreme Court
of the Stateof New held in and for the County of Kings, at
York,
Courthouse located at 36 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New
the
York on the jW day of , 20 I#7
.
)
PRESENT:
COLON , Justice CAL. NO. 1
c 9 0 (r Y Cdoctl'l Plaintiff(s),
-against- FINAL DISPOSITION PART ORDER
INDEX NO.
60¯
S ( t D en s)
Plaintiff
must t, of ssileon õr before
Pursuant to CPLR Rule 3216, faihire file.theNote ofIssue resultin thisaction dismissed based on
totimelÿ may being
want of prosecution. The followin ypecifiefillüfesto with court orders (dates provided constitutes the
comply below)
basisfora finding of neglect,which conduc$,lfâlibe the basisof a finding t at thep!ai"W Amacated a general
pattern ofpelay,in proceeding wit the 1,ittigatiÿn I (1
[ )t }30
PC: / 2, /.3 CC: FCP: fo Other: N /7
Pursuant to CPLR Rule 3 I26. the s ailures the and r p ntiff to with court
fohowing by defendant(s) (s) comply
orders (datesprovided below), constitutes thebasis fÒ4a of wil ful d conduct that result in
finding may
preclusion or he striking of your pleadings //o n /
9'
PC: /J- R CC: FCP: Otheè i 7
The following outstanding discovery. previousl. order4inthe orders abov sh n the manner:
following
This action s adjourned to ..b forverificationof compliance and/o fi al rmination.
The (crms of this order supers e the prÖvisions of allprior orders.
FAILURE TO STRICTLY OMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, WITHOUT LEAVE O OURT, WILL
RESULT IN DISMlSSA . ESLWSIGN, THE STRIKING OF A PLEADING A D NCTIONS AS MAY
BE APP t PRIATF
ENTER
.usc
Preview
BHURTEL LAW FIRM PLLC Attorney At Law Email: richard@attorneybhurtel.com 2" 37-49 75thstreet Floor, Jackson Heights NY 11372 Phone: 718-509-6181 April 23, 2019 CENTRAL COMPLAINCE PART SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS Re: NIDAL ABOU TRABAH v. Z & N HILLSIDE/SUTPHIN LLC, et al. Index No#: 504087/12 Dear sir/madam: Attached please find a copy of the final disposition part order signed by the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant on April 11, 2019 withdrawing the 2 motions both returnable on April 26, 2019. Please note that when the undersigned attorney called the motion support part at 347-401-9249 this morning, the court clerk said the final disposition part order dated April 11, 2019 was also signed by the judge, making appearance for these motions on April 26, 2019 unnecessary. Therefore, please mark off the 2 motions from the calendar. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Bhurtel Law Firm PLLC/Plaintiff's attorney By:Richard Pak, Esq. At a Note of Issue Final Disposition Part of The Supreme Court of the Stateof New held in and for the County of Kings, at York, Courthouse located at 36 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New the York on the jW day of , 20 I#7 . ) PRESENT: COLON , Justice CAL. NO. 1 c 9 0 (r Y Cdoctl'l Plaintiff(s), -against- FINAL DISPOSITION PART ORDER INDEX NO. 60¯ S ( t D en s) Plaintiff must t, of ssileon õr before Pursuant to CPLR Rule 3216, faihire file.theNote ofIssue resultin thisaction dismissed based on totimelÿ may being want of prosecution. The followin ypecifiefillüfesto with court orders (dates provided constitutes the comply below) basisfora finding of neglect,which conduc$,lfâlibe the basisof a finding t at thep!ai"W Amacated a general pattern ofpelay,in proceeding wit the 1,ittigatiÿn I (1 [ )t }30 PC: / 2, /.3 CC: FCP: fo Other: N /7 Pursuant to CPLR Rule 3 I26. the s ailures the and r p ntiff to with court fohowing by defendant(s) (s) comply orders (datesprovided below), constitutes thebasis fÒ4a of wil ful d conduct that result in finding may preclusion or he striking of your pleadings //o n / 9' PC: /J- R CC: FCP: Otheè i 7 The following outstanding discovery. previousl. order4inthe orders abov sh n the manner: following This action s adjourned to ..b forverificationof compliance and/o fi al rmination. The (crms of this order supers e the prÖvisions of allprior orders. FAILURE TO STRICTLY OMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, WITHOUT LEAVE O OURT, WILL RESULT IN DISMlSSA . ESLWSIGN, THE STRIKING OF A PLEADING A D NCTIONS AS MAY BE APP t PRIATF ENTER .usc