On July 09, 2015 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Held Phd, Anthony E.,
Moore, John,
and
Cvs Caremark Corporation,
Cvs Caremark Corporation, Cvs Pharmacy Inc,
Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.,
Does 1 To 150, Inclusive,
Medline Industries, Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
MUI
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-04-2016 9:40 am
Case Number: CGC-15-546785
Filing Date: May-04-2016 9:39
Filed by: JOSE RIOS-MERIDA
Image: 05382195
/ . ORDER
ANTHONY E. HELD PHD VS. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION ET AL
001005382195
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.1 || Brian Johnson, State Bar No. 235965
Josh Voorhees, State Bar No. 241436
2 || THE CHANLER GROUP
2560 Ninth Street
3 Parker Plaza, Suite 214
Berkeley, CA 94710-2565 F I L
4 || Telephone: (510) 848-8880
Facsimile: (510) 848-8118 Senet Cott aoe
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAY - 4 2016 —
6 || JOHN MOORE and
‘ANTHONY E. HELD, PHLD., P-E. CLERK g R F COURT
7 BY Deputy Clerk
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
11 UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
12
13
14 ANTHONY E. HELD, PH_D., P.E., ef al., Case No. CGC-15-546785
AK
15 Plaintiff, [RROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT
16 v. AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
17 || CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, et a/., | Date: May 4, 2016
Time: 9:30 a.m.
18 Defendants. Dept.: 302
Judge: Hon. Harold Kahn
Reservation No. 03140504-01
ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENTe @
1 Plaintiffs John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E., and defendant Medline
2 || Industries, Inc., have agreed to the terms of the mutually executed settlement memorialized in
3 || the [Proposed] Consent Judgment, attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Brian Johnson in
4 || Support of Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged
5 |] herewith, and plaintiff has moved this Court for an Order approving the settlement,
6 After consideration of the papers submitted and the arguments presented, the Court
7 || finds that the settlement agreement set forth in the Consent Judgment meets the criteria
8 || established by California Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(f)(4), in that:
9 1. The warnings and other injunctive relief required by the Consent Judgment
10 complies with Proposition 65;
11 2. the reimbursement of fees and costs provided by the Consent Judgment is
12 reasonable under California law; and
13 3. the civil penalty payment pursuant to the Consent Judgment is reasonable
14 according to the factors enumerated in Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b)(2).
15 || Accordingly, the Motion for Approval of this Proposition 65 Settlement is GRANTED.
16 || IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 5
18 || Dated: SNe eT _—
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
° Hoy: HAROLD KAHN
20
21
22
23
24
25
“ 26
27
28
ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
May 04, 2016
Case Filing Date
July 09, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
MUI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-04-2016 9:40 am Case Number: CGC-15-546785 Filing Date: May-04-2016 9:39 Filed by: JOSE RIOS-MERIDA Image: 05382195 / . ORDER ANTHONY E. HELD PHD VS. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION ET AL 001005382195 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.1 || Brian Johnson, State Bar No. 235965 Josh Voorhees, State Bar No. 241436 2 || THE CHANLER GROUP 2560 Ninth Street 3 Parker Plaza, Suite 214 Berkeley, CA 94710-2565 F I L 4 || Telephone: (510) 848-8880 Facsimile: (510) 848-8118 Senet Cott aoe 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAY - 4 2016 — 6 || JOHN MOORE and ‘ANTHONY E. HELD, PHLD., P-E. CLERK g R F COURT 7 BY Deputy Clerk 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION 12 13 14 ANTHONY E. HELD, PH_D., P.E., ef al., Case No. CGC-15-546785 AK 15 Plaintiff, [RROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT 16 v. AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 17 || CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, et a/., | Date: May 4, 2016 Time: 9:30 a.m. 18 Defendants. Dept.: 302 Judge: Hon. Harold Kahn Reservation No. 03140504-01 ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENTe @ 1 Plaintiffs John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E., and defendant Medline 2 || Industries, Inc., have agreed to the terms of the mutually executed settlement memorialized in 3 || the [Proposed] Consent Judgment, attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Brian Johnson in 4 || Support of Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged 5 |] herewith, and plaintiff has moved this Court for an Order approving the settlement, 6 After consideration of the papers submitted and the arguments presented, the Court 7 || finds that the settlement agreement set forth in the Consent Judgment meets the criteria 8 || established by California Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(f)(4), in that: 9 1. The warnings and other injunctive relief required by the Consent Judgment 10 complies with Proposition 65; 11 2. the reimbursement of fees and costs provided by the Consent Judgment is 12 reasonable under California law; and 13 3. the civil penalty payment pursuant to the Consent Judgment is reasonable 14 according to the factors enumerated in Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b)(2). 15 || Accordingly, the Motion for Approval of this Proposition 65 Settlement is GRANTED. 16 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 5 18 || Dated: SNe eT _— JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ° Hoy: HAROLD KAHN 20 21 22 23 24 25 “ 26 27 28 ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT