Preview
BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER
District Clerk
Fort Bend County, Texas
301 Jackson
Richmond, Texas 77469
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Penalty for Private Use
RICHARD M. COLE III
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD COLE
12401 S POST OAK RD STE 219
HOUSTON TX 77045
BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER
District Clerk
Fort Bend County, Texas
August 15, 2019
In accordance with the provisions of Rule 306a.3 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that
in the 505th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas; Cause No. 19-DCV-262902 IN THE MATTER OF
THE MARRIAGE OF LAURA Y. HAMILTON AND HYMAN H. HAMILTON, FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE
was/were entered and said judgment was signed on August 01, 2019.
A copy of the FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE may be obtained from the Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office,
1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Richmond, TX 77469 or you may mail a copy request along with payment such as
Money Order or Check (No Out-of-State Checks Are Accepted) to Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office, 301
Jackson Street, Room 101 Richmond, TX 77469.
The FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE contains 10 pages. The payment amount to obtain a copy of the FINAL
DECREE OF DIVORCE from the Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office will be $10.00. An unofficial copy may be
obtained free of charge at www.fortbendcountytx.gov.
Please Note: If your case is sealed/confidential upon disposition, an order of the court to obtain a copy must be
granted before a copy can be obtained.
DISTRICT CLERK BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER
Fort Bend County, Texas
Physical Address:
1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Room 31004
Richmond, Texas 77469
Mailing Address:
301 Jackson Street, Room 101
Richmond, Texas 77469
By:
Deputy District Clerk Janessa M. De la Cruz
Telephone: (281) 633-7645
Related Content
in Fort Bend County
Ruling
BRIMHALL VS BRIMHALL
Jul 23, 2024 |
FL-18-000951
FL-18-000951 – BRIMHALL VS BRIMHALL Petitioner’s Request for Order re Change Venue—DENIED, without prejudice.
There is no proof of service on file as required. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.94(b).)
This is a dissolution case in which a status-only judgment was filed on July 3, 2021, but no judgment on reserved issues has been entered, and Petitioner’s counsel recently withdrew. Accordingly, individual party service of Respondent is mandatory and jurisdictional. (Fam. Code, § 215(a).)
That said, the parties’ Stipulation and Order of January 8, 2021, resolved Petitioner’s move-away request and resulted in an agreed move of Petitioner and the minor child to the county of San Diego. Further, Petitioner alleges that Respondent no longer resides in this forum. If true, then the Court has authority to transfer the case as requested to San Diego County based on the convenience of the parties and the ends of justice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 397.5.)
The Court is inclined to grant the request based on this authority, but Respondent must either be properly served or else Respondent must personally appear and waive service. Petitioner may attempt to demonstrate good cause to continue the hearing to obtain service of Respondent; otherwise, the request will be denied without prejudice and Petitioner will need to file and serve a new order request.
Ruling
Metzger, Sr. vs. Metzger, Jr., et al.
Jul 25, 2024 |
22CV-0201077
METZGER, SR. VS. METZGER, JR., ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0201077
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on May 28, 2024 by Judge Boeckman, pursuant to Gov’t Code §
68608(b) to Plaintiff and Counsel for failure to cure the defects noted by the Court on February
20, 2024. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the OSC. However, proof of service has been filed
indicating that the Second Amended Complaint has been served on all parties. The OSC is
DISCHARGED. No appearance is necessary on the 8:30 a.m. calendar. The Court confirms
today’s 9:00 a.m. review hearing.
Ruling
Flores vs. Hudson
Jul 27, 2024 |
24CV-0204646
FLORES VS. HUDSON
Case Number: 24CV-0204646
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Sanctions issued on June 13, 2024, to Plaintiff Eladio Flores, in pro per, for failure to timely serve
pleadings on Defendant Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson (Katy Perry) pursuant to California Rules of
Court, Rule 3.110(b). “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of
service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the
complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on March 29, 2024, and no
proof of service has been filed. Plaintiff did not file a written response to the Order to Show Cause.
With no sufficient excuse for the delay, sanctions are imposed in the amount of $250.00 against
Plaintiff. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate Order of Sanctions. The Court will issue an
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal pursuant to Gov’t Code Section 68608(b) for Plaintiff’s failure
to timely serve the complaint. The hearing on the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal is set for
Monday, September 9, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 64. The clerk is instructed to prepare
a separate Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. This matter is also calendared on Monday,
September 9, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 64 for review regarding status of service.
Ruling
JACKSON VS JACKSON
Jul 22, 2024 |
FL-23-002067
FL-23-002067 – JACKSON VS JACKSON
Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Sell Family Residence,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED.
This is a continued hearing. It appears that the request regarding the 1972 Chevrolet Pickup Truck has been resolved or is moot. Likewise, this appears to be the case with the request regarding the marital residence because Respondent is not opposed to sale provided that sufficient time before listing and sale is extended in order to conduct repairs necessary to obtain full value and as short a time on market as possible. (Respondent’s Supplemental Declaration.) The Court will reserve jurisdiction over the question of attorney’s fees and costs until disposition of the marital residence. Counsel are to meet and confer prior to the hearing as to a reasonable time for repairs to be completed and any other disputes that are within the scope of the pending order request. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.98.)
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge David I. Hood in Department #25:
Ruling
In Re: Tabag
Jul 25, 2024 |
24CV-0204603
IN RE: TABAG
Case Number: 24CV-0204603
Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Ramsey Anthony Viloria Tabag
also known as Ramsey C. Viloria seeks to change his name to Ramsey Viloria. All procedural
requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied. The Petition is GRANTED. All future
dates will be vacated, and the file closed upon the processing of the Decree Changing Name.
Ruling
Metzger, Sr. vs. Metzger, Jr., et al.
Jul 23, 2024 |
22CV-0201077
METZGER, SR. VS. METZGER, JR., ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0201077
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on May 28, 2024 by Judge Boeckman, pursuant to Gov’t Code §
68608(b) to Plaintiff and Counsel for failure to cure the defects noted by the Court on February
20, 2024. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the OSC. However, proof of service has been filed
indicating that the Second Amended Complaint has been served on all parties. The OSC is
DISCHARGED. No appearance is necessary on the 8:30 a.m. calendar. The Court confirms
today’s 9:00 a.m. review hearing.
Ruling
AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA
Jul 24, 2024 |
FL-24-000399
FL-24-000399 – AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA Respondent’s Request for Order re Discovery—HEARING REQUIRED.
After review of the papers and pleadings, the Court finds that a discovery dispute has arisen that appears amenable to resolution without a contested hearing. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to set an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) under the auspices of a Family Centered Case Resolution Plan, and to stay determination of the present motion and any other pending discovery disputes until completion of the IDC. (Fam. Code, §§ 2450(a), 2451(a)(3); Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.83(c)(6)(D),(E).) The parties shall appear and may be heard on the IDC and, if ordered, to schedule the IDC at the earliest mutual availability of counsel and the IDC officer.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
Ruling
AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA
Jul 23, 2024 |
FL-24-000399
FL-24-000399 – AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA Respondent’s Request for Order re Discovery—HEARING REQUIRED.
After review of the papers and pleadings, the Court finds that a discovery dispute has arisen that appears amenable to resolution without a contested hearing. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to set an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) under the auspices of a Family Centered Case Resolution Plan, and to stay determination of the present motion and any other pending discovery disputes until completion of the IDC. (Fam. Code, §§ 2450(a), 2451(a)(3); Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.83(c)(6)(D),(E).) The parties shall appear and may be heard on the IDC and, if ordered, to schedule the IDC at the earliest mutual availability of counsel and the IDC officer.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
Preview
BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER District Clerk Fort Bend County, Texas 301 Jackson Richmond, Texas 77469 OFFICIAL BUSINESS Penalty for Private Use RICHARD M. COLE III LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD COLE 12401 S POST OAK RD STE 219 HOUSTON TX 77045 BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER District Clerk Fort Bend County, Texas August 15, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of Rule 306a.3 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, you are hereby notified that in the 505th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas; Cause No. 19-DCV-262902 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LAURA Y. HAMILTON AND HYMAN H. HAMILTON, FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE was/were entered and said judgment was signed on August 01, 2019. A copy of the FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE may be obtained from the Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office, 1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Richmond, TX 77469 or you may mail a copy request along with payment such as Money Order or Check (No Out-of-State Checks Are Accepted) to Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office, 301 Jackson Street, Room 101 Richmond, TX 77469. The FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE contains 10 pages. The payment amount to obtain a copy of the FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE from the Fort Bend County District Clerk’s Office will be $10.00. An unofficial copy may be obtained free of charge at www.fortbendcountytx.gov. Please Note: If your case is sealed/confidential upon disposition, an order of the court to obtain a copy must be granted before a copy can be obtained. DISTRICT CLERK BEVERLEY MCGREW WALKER Fort Bend County, Texas Physical Address: 1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Room 31004 Richmond, Texas 77469 Mailing Address: 301 Jackson Street, Room 101 Richmond, Texas 77469 By: Deputy District Clerk Janessa M. De la Cruz Telephone: (281) 633-7645