Preview
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2015 03:40 PM INDEX NO. 20559/2013E
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2015
OB-1131-Y
JBK-tc
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF BRONX
-------------------------------------X
CARLA PEREZ, as Administrator of the Index No.: 20559/2013E
Last Goods, Chattels and Credits
which were the Estate of Maria T. ANSWER TO THIRD PARTY
Ramos, Deceased, SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
-against-
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
-------------------------------------X
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS Index No.: 43102/2015E
CORPORATION,
Third Party Plaintiff,
-against-
URBAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.,
Third Party Defendant.
-------------------------------------X
Defendant, URBAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., by their attorneys,
FUMUSO, KELLY, DeVERNA, SNYDER, SWART & FARRELL, LLP as and for
their Verified Answer to the Third Party Summons and Verified
Complaint of the plaintiff herein, respectfully alleges upon
information and belief as follows:
FIRST: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in
paragraphs numbered and designated “1”, “2", “3" and “4" of the
plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint and
respectfully submits all questions of fact and law to this
Honorable Court.
ANSWERING THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION:
SECOND: With respect to paragraph “5” of the
plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint, the
defendant repeats and realleges paragraphs numbered and
designated “FIRST” through “FIRST” inclusive of this Answer.
THIRD: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in
paragraphs numbered and designated “6” and “7" of the plaintiff’s
Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint excepts admits URBAN
HEALTH PLAN, INC., was and is a federally deemed healthcare
center existing under the applicable law of the United States as
well as the State of New York and respectfully submits all
questions of fact and law to this Honorable Court.
FOURTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in
paragraph numbered and designated “8” of the plaintiff’s Third
Party Summons and Verified Complaint.
FIFTH: Denies each and every allegation contained in
paragraphs numbered and designated “9” and “10" of the
plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint.
ANSWERING THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION:
SIXTH: With respect to paragraph “11” of the
plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint, the
defendant repeats and realleges paragraphs numbered and
designated “FIRST” through “FIFTH” inclusive of this Answer.
SEVENTH: Denies each and every allegation contained in
paragraphs numbered and designated “12” and “13" of the
plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint.
AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
EIGHTH: That the injuries of the plaintiff was caused
in whole or in part by her own contributory negligence and/or
culpable conduct and/or by persons and/or events over which this
defendant had no control and her claims are therefore barred or
the amount of same is diminished accordingly.
AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
NINTH: Upon information and belief, plaintiff has
received remuneration and/or compensation for some or all of her
claimed economic loss and answering defendant is entitled to have
any verdict or judgment reduced by the amount of that
remuneration or compensation pursuant to CPLR 4545.
AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
TENTH: That the plaintiff’s Third Party Summons and
Verified Complaint and/or the cause of action fails to state a
cause of action against the answering defendant.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
ELEVENTH: That if any liability is found as against
this answering defendant, then said liability will constitute 50%
or less of the total liability assigned to all persons liable
and, as such, the liability of this answering defendant to
plaintiff for non-economic loss shall be limited and shall not
exceed this answering defendant’s equitable share, as provided in
Article 16 of the CPLR.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
TWELFTH: Plaintiff lacks capacity to assert the claims
made within the Third Party Summons and Verified Complaint.
AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
THIRTEENTH: That in the event of any judgment or
verdict on behalf of the plaintiff, this answering defendant is
entitled to a setoff with respect to the amount of any payments
made to the plaintiff prior thereto.
AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
FOURTEENTH: That the defendant shall be entitled to a
set off pursuant to the General Obligations Law §15-108 for
reduction in the claim of the Releasor against them to the extent
of any amount stipulated by a prior release or covenant, or the
amount of consideration paid for it, or the amount of the
released tortfeasor’s equitable share of the damages under
Article 14 of the CPLR, whichever is the greatest.
AS AND FOR A EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
FIFTEENTH: Urban Health Plan Inc., is protected under
the Federally deemed Health Centers Assistance Act and thus, this
Court lacks jurisdiction over them. They can only be sued in the
appropriate Federal Court under the Federal Torts Claims Act.
AS AND FOR A CROSS COMPLAINT OVER AND AGAINST
THE CO-DEFENDANT, NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
SIXTEENTH: Upon information and belief, that if the
plaintiff, was caused to sustain the injuries and damages at the
time and manner alleged in the Third Party Summons and Complaint
and if such injuries and damages were not sustained by reason of
plaintiff’s negligence in whole or in part, then such injuries
and damages were sustained as a result of the primary, active and
affirmative negligence of the co-defendant jointly and severally
and this answering defendant does claim contribution over and
against the co-defendant.
SEVENTEENTH: Upon information and belief, that if the
plaintiff, recover a verdict or judgment against the answering
defendants, that by reason of the aforesaid, said defendants will
be entitled by law, contract or equity to be indemnified in whole
or in party the co-defendant by reason of their primary, active
and affirmative negligence.
WHEREFORE, this defendant demands judgment dismissing
the Complaint together with the costs and disbursements, and
further demand that the relative responsibilities of the said
defendants be apportioned and that this answering defendant
herein have contribution, indemnification and judgment against
the co-defendant for any verdict or judgment that may be
recovered against said answering defendant herein, by the
plaintiffs in this action together with all the costs of
investigation, disbursements, expenses and attorney’s fees
incurred in the defense of this action and in the conduct of the
Cross Complaint.
Dated: Hauppauge, New York
June 8, 2015
Yours, etc.
FUMUSO, KELLY, DeVERNA, SNYDER,
SWART & FARRELL, LLP
Attorneys for Third Party Defendant
Urban Health Plan, Inc.
110 Marcus Boulevard, Suite 500
Hauppauge, New York 11788
(631) 232-0200
To: SCHIAVETTI, CORGAN, DIEDWARDS,
WEINBERG & NICHOLSON, LLP
Attorneys for defendant/third
party plaintiff
New York City Hospital and
Hospitals Corporation
575 Eighth Avenue 14, Fl.
New York, NY 10018
(212) 541-9100