Preview
UI
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-11-2018 3:46 pm
Case Number: CGC-16-554668
Filing Date: Apr-11-2018 3:46
Filed by: KAREN LIU
Image: 06292196
ORDER
NATHAN KOHRS VS. ARGOZ, INC. ET AL
001006292196
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.2011011
oOo ON DH FF Ww NY
NN YN YN NY NN YN He Be Bee we Be Be SB eB ew
ed DA FY Ho F&F SO we IW DH BF BY KY
OLEG I. ALBERT, State Bar No. 251270
oleg@leclerclaw.com
LE CLERC & LE CLERC LLP
155 Montgomery Street, Suite 1004
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 445-0900
Facsimile: (415) 445-9977
Attorneys for Defendants
ARGOZ, INC.; FIVE MILL, INC.
and DAN D. SOHA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE
NATHAN KOHRS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARGOZ, INC.; FIVE MILL, INC.; DAN
D. SOHA; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. CGC-16-554668
[PR 'D] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO TRIFURCATE
PROCEEDINGS
[CCP.§ 598, 1048(b)]
Date: March 28, 2018
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Dept.: 302
Reservation: 02260328-14
Trial: 4/30/2018
[PROMpSED) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE PROCEEDINGSoO ND HW BF WwW VY
by Re YY YY BY KY NK NY DY ee
&2 Ya as SEK FS SFGe DAA BEHE SS
The Court issued a tentative order on March 27, 2018; the parties did not contest the
tentative. Having duly considered the brief and evidence submitted by the parties,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Defendants Argoz, Inc., Five Mill, Inc. and Dan Soha's motion to trifurcate proceedings is
granted as to the request to bifurcate the amount of punitive damages from all other issues and
denied as to the request for a separate trial phase on alter ego liability without prejudice to re-
raising that request before the trial judge. Defendants have a statutory right to bifurcation of the
amount of punitive damages and that request is not opposed. The trial judge, not a pre-trial judge,
is in the best position to evaluate whether a separate trial phase on alter ego liability would
promote judicial economy and the interests of justice.
Dated: 4 Jols Ce
BD indge of The Superior Court
HAROLD KAHN
SEE EXHIBIT “A” RE
COMPLIANCE WITH CRC 3.1312
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE PROCEEDINGSFrom: Oleg Albert
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 12:07 PM
To: Contestdept302tr
Cc: Erik Heath
Subject: RE: Line 4, Nathan Kohrs v. Argoz, Inc., at al., Case Number: CGC-16554668
Attachments: [Proposed] Order.docx
Dear Clerk,
Following up on my email below. Please advise if there is anything else I can do to facilitate the attached proposed
order being entered.
Thank you,
Oleg I. Albert, Esq.
Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP
155 Montgomery Str., Suite 1004
Notice: The message and any file transmitted with it contain confidential information which may be subject to the attorney-
client privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, or otherwise protected against disclosure or unauthorized use. The
information contained in this message and any file transmitted with it is transmitted in this form based on a reasonable
expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of the
information by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message and any attachments.
From: Oleg Albert
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 11:27 AM
To: 'contestdept302tr@sftc.org'
Ce: 'Erik Heath’
Subject: Line 4, Nathan Kohrs v. Argoz, Inc., at al., Case Number: CGC-16554668
Dear Clerk,
Attached is the proposed order which repeats verbatim the Court's tentative which was not contested by any of the
parties. | am CCing Mr. Kohrs’ counsel J. Erik Heath, on this email.
Thank you,
Oleg I. Albert, Esq.
Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP
155 Montgomery Str., Suite 1004
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: 445.0900
Dir: 415.446.9799
Fax: 415.445.9977 EX i
IT "A
Preview
UI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Apr-11-2018 3:46 pm Case Number: CGC-16-554668 Filing Date: Apr-11-2018 3:46 Filed by: KAREN LIU Image: 06292196 ORDER NATHAN KOHRS VS. ARGOZ, INC. ET AL 001006292196 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.2011011 oOo ON DH FF Ww NY NN YN YN NY NN YN He Be Bee we Be Be SB eB ew ed DA FY Ho F&F SO we IW DH BF BY KY OLEG I. ALBERT, State Bar No. 251270 oleg@leclerclaw.com LE CLERC & LE CLERC LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 1004 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 445-0900 Facsimile: (415) 445-9977 Attorneys for Defendants ARGOZ, INC.; FIVE MILL, INC. and DAN D. SOHA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE NATHAN KOHRS, Plaintiff, v. ARGOZ, INC.; FIVE MILL, INC.; DAN D. SOHA; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CGC-16-554668 [PR 'D] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE PROCEEDINGS [CCP.§ 598, 1048(b)] Date: March 28, 2018 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 302 Reservation: 02260328-14 Trial: 4/30/2018 [PROMpSED) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE PROCEEDINGSoO ND HW BF WwW VY by Re YY YY BY KY NK NY DY ee &2 Ya as SEK FS SFGe DAA BEHE SS The Court issued a tentative order on March 27, 2018; the parties did not contest the tentative. Having duly considered the brief and evidence submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants Argoz, Inc., Five Mill, Inc. and Dan Soha's motion to trifurcate proceedings is granted as to the request to bifurcate the amount of punitive damages from all other issues and denied as to the request for a separate trial phase on alter ego liability without prejudice to re- raising that request before the trial judge. Defendants have a statutory right to bifurcation of the amount of punitive damages and that request is not opposed. The trial judge, not a pre-trial judge, is in the best position to evaluate whether a separate trial phase on alter ego liability would promote judicial economy and the interests of justice. Dated: 4 Jols Ce BD indge of The Superior Court HAROLD KAHN SEE EXHIBIT “A” RE COMPLIANCE WITH CRC 3.1312 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE PROCEEDINGSFrom: Oleg Albert Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 12:07 PM To: Contestdept302tr Cc: Erik Heath Subject: RE: Line 4, Nathan Kohrs v. Argoz, Inc., at al., Case Number: CGC-16554668 Attachments: [Proposed] Order.docx Dear Clerk, Following up on my email below. Please advise if there is anything else I can do to facilitate the attached proposed order being entered. Thank you, Oleg I. Albert, Esq. Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP 155 Montgomery Str., Suite 1004 Notice: The message and any file transmitted with it contain confidential information which may be subject to the attorney- client privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, or otherwise protected against disclosure or unauthorized use. The information contained in this message and any file transmitted with it is transmitted in this form based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of the information by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message and any attachments. From: Oleg Albert Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 11:27 AM To: 'contestdept302tr@sftc.org' Ce: 'Erik Heath’ Subject: Line 4, Nathan Kohrs v. Argoz, Inc., at al., Case Number: CGC-16554668 Dear Clerk, Attached is the proposed order which repeats verbatim the Court's tentative which was not contested by any of the parties. | am CCing Mr. Kohrs’ counsel J. Erik Heath, on this email. Thank you, Oleg I. Albert, Esq. Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP 155 Montgomery Str., Suite 1004 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 445.0900 Dir: 415.446.9799 Fax: 415.445.9977 EX i IT "A