Order: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jose Vasquez A/K/A JOSE R. VASQUEZ, Francy Vasquez, Julio Villegas, Geico A/S/O Vanessa Oconnor, New York State Department Of Taxation And Finance, Westchester County Clerk, John Doe
On December 31, 2013 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
and
Francy Vasquez,
Geico A S O Vanessa Oconnor,
John Doe,
Jose Vasquez A K A Jose R. Vasquez,
Julio Villegas,
New York State Department Of Taxation And Finance,
Westchester County Clerk,
for Foreclosure (residential mortgage)
in the District Court of Westchester County.
Preview
INDEX NO. 70721/2013
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
FORECLOSURE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PART
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
wenn enn n ene n nen. neni
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
FORECLOSURE
Plaintiff, SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
-against- CONDITIONAL ORDER
Index No.: 70721/2013
JOSE VASQUEZ, et. al,
Defendant.
srbsee eee neee ee ieeE bee eo Loon nce SuR RENEE NECENES,
SCHEINKMAN, J.,
Appearances:
Plaintiff Hogan Lovells US LLP
Defendant Fuster Law, P.C.
In accordance with the Rules of the Foreclosure Settlement Conference Part, and upon the
Foreclosure Settlement Conference held by and before Erin Noelle Guven, Court Attorney-Referee, on
December 17, 2014, the said Court Attorney-Referee herein reports that the parties have been directed as
follows:
On or before January 5, 2015, defendant’s representative shall submit to plaintiff's attorney any
further documentation as to the need for which defendant’s representative has been advised via e-mail on
December 15, 2014 in connection with an application that had been submitted to plaintiff for a
modification of the mortgage loan at issue in the above-referenced foreclosure action;
If defendant complies with these submission deadlines, following timely receipt of all needed
documentation as aforesaid, plaintiff shall review the application, make a determination offering or
declining to offer defendant a loan modification plan, and advise defendant’s representative of such
determination on or before February 20, 2015;
In the event that plaintiff fails to make such determination and/or defendant’s representative has
not received written notice of such determination on or before February 20, 2015, plaintiff must appear
on April 16, 2015, the next scheduled date for appearance in the Foreclosure Settlement Conference Part,
in person by an officer or employee with full authority to discuss and resolve any issues concerning this
matter;
In the absence of good cause shown, plaintiff's failure to advise defendant’s representative of its
determination offering or declining to offer defendant a loan modification plan in timely fashion or, in said
event, to appear by an authorized officer/employee shall constitute failure to comply with plaintiff's
obligation under 22 NYCRR 202. 12-a (c)(4) to engage in settlement discussions and negotiations in good
faith, and may result in the imposition of sanctions against plaintiff including, but not limited to, the tolling
of interest nunc pro tunc from December 17, 2014
ERIN NOELLE GUVEN
Court Attorney-Referee
Dated: White Plains, New York SO ORDERED:
December / 2014
eee EL. Sb. Lat
Justiee
of the Supreme Court
fan. Luce &. Ta lbatmn
de Absence JL HOW
kan D Schein km
y. 3 : ool