On July 11, 2014 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent Of Financial Services Of The State Of New York,
The People Of The State Of New York, By Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General Of The State Of New York,
and
Lyft, Inc.,
for Other Special Proceeding
in the District Court of New York County.
Preview
Db: YORK OUN Kk AM INDEX NO. 451476/2014
JS 0:
NYSCEF BOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
HON. KATHRYN FREED
PRESENT: JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT PART S-
Justice
woexvo, £5 (4+76/
The feophe of the bteleop NY, ot, ab
ve MOTION DATE SL tet
Life Sore MOTION SEQ. NO._O] |
The following papers, numbered 1 to , were read on this motion to/for
Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause — Affidavits — Exhibits No(s).
Answering Affidavits — Exhibits [Nojs).
Replying Affidavits [Nojs).
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is
MarthJp
ated: JUL 31 2014 ,JS.C.
JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT
1, CHECK ONE:..... ease CJ CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: .MOTION IS: [_] GRANTED (DENIED (GRANTED IN PART CIoTHER
3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: (COSETTLE ORDER C1 suBMIiT ORDER
(po noT Post (FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT (REFERENCE
Document Filed Date
August 01, 2014
Case Filing Date
July 11, 2014
Category
Other Special Proceeding
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Db: YORK OUN Kk AM INDEX NO. 451476/2014 JS 0: NYSCEF BOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY HON. KATHRYN FREED PRESENT: JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT PART S- Justice woexvo, £5 (4+76/ The feophe of the bteleop NY, ot, ab ve MOTION DATE SL tet Life Sore MOTION SEQ. NO._O] | The following papers, numbered 1 to , were read on this motion to/for Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause — Affidavits — Exhibits No(s). Answering Affidavits — Exhibits [Nojs). Replying Affidavits [Nojs). Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is MarthJp ated: JUL 31 2014 ,JS.C. JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT 1, CHECK ONE:..... ease CJ CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: .MOTION IS: [_] GRANTED (DENIED (GRANTED IN PART CIoTHER 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: (COSETTLE ORDER C1 suBMIiT ORDER (po noT Post (FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT (REFERENCE