Motion-Secondary: Maiden Reinsurance Company As Subrogee Of D&E Transport, Inc And D&E Transport, Llc v. Katalyst Worldwide, Inc And, Yoviel Marrero

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPREME        COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
                  COUNTY OF ONONDAGA
                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------X
                  MAIDEN       REINSURANCE          COMPANY, as Subrogee            of        Index No.: 2014EF5077
                  D&E TRANSPORT,            INC., and D&E TRANSPORT,               LLC,

                                                               Plaintiffs,                    ORDER
                                    -against-

                  KATALYST        WORLDWIDE,           INC. and YOVIEL
                  MARRERO,

                                                               Defendant,
                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------X



                           Plaintiffs MAIDEN       REINSURANCE           COMPANY,         as  Subrogee    of  D&E    TRANSPORT,

                  INC.,    and   D&E     TRANSPORT,          LLC    (hereinafter   referred   to   as  “D&E     Transport”),    having

                  moved    this Court   for an  Order    pursuant   to CPLR     §3215(a)    directing  the clerk  to  enter  judgment

                  against  the  Defendant    KATALYST         WORLDWIDE,          INC.    (hereinafter  referred  to  as  “Katalyst”),

                  by  reason   of  their failure to answer    the  Summons     and  Complaint    and,  for  such  other,  further  and

                  different  relief as this Court   may deem just,     proper and equitable;     and


                           Upon    the  reading    the  Notice   of   Motion    dated   November      6,  2015    and   the  Attorney

                  Affirmation   In   Support    of  Timothy    P.  Welch,    Esq.  dated   November      6,  2015    with  supporting

                  exhibits;  and


                           Upon receiving     no opposition     to said motion   from   Defendant    Katalyst;   and


                           Upon    hearing  oral  argument    on  behalf   of D&E     Transport    in support   of  the  motion;   itis

                  hereby
                           ORDERED,        that  the  motion    for  pursuant   to  CPLR     §3215(a)    for  judgment    against   the

                  Defendant    Katalyst   by  reason   of  their failure  to answer    the Summons      and  Complaint    brought   on

                  behalf  of plaintiff  D&E Transport,      is GRANTED        in its entirety.




                                                               _____________________________________

                                                                        James   P. Murphy      J.S.C.




                  ENTERED: