arrow left
arrow right
  • NINETY NINE HEALTHCARE MANAGMENT LLC, et al  vs.  THOMAS MICHAUD, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-l 7-0041 1 NINETY-NINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, IN THE DISTRICT COURT LLC; BLUE DOG ANESTHESIA, P.A.; and, GAMBREEZZI, P.A. Plaintiffs, v. 298th JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.; ”flammmmmmflmmm FOUNDATION SURGICAL HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC; THOMAS MICHAUD; MARCELO PUIGGARI; LORIN PATTERSON; ROBERT M. BYERS, HUGH KING and, STANTON NELSON Defendants DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GMNTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND ENTRY OF LEVEL 3 SCHEDULING ORDER On the 7th day of September 2018, a hearing was held on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Lift Stay (filed with the misnomer title of Motion to Sever) and for entry of a Level 3 Scheduling Order. After hearing argument by counsel and considering the merits of the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be Granted. It istherefore ORDERED, ADIUDGED, and DECREED that the Bankruptcy Stay which was noted in the Court’s record 0n June 29, 2017 is hereby lifted; Plaintiffs request for a Level 3 Scheduling Order is Granted. 39 Signed on ORDER Decemberfl 2019. WMQ HONORABLE MONIC‘KMJ PURDY M Page 1