arrow left
arrow right
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Leone Souverain v. Quality Wholesale, Inc., Kenneth Dupas, Marie Point-Du-Jour, Pierre W. Hector Torts - Motor Vehicle document preview
						
                                

Preview

INDEX NO. 035401/2415 NYSCEF DOC. NO}) 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2916 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE E NEW YORK COUNTY OF ROCKLAND ------------------- +--+. aa -X LEONE SOUVERAIN, Plaintiff, VERIFIED ANSWER -against-— QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC., KENNETH Index #035401/15 DUPAS, MARIE POINT-DU-JOUR and PIERRE W.. HECTOR, Defendants. Defendants, KENNEITH DUPAS and QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC., by their attorneys, LaROSE & LaROSE as and for their Answer to the plaintiff LEONE SOUVERAIN’S Complaint, respectfully state and allege as follows: 1 Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations set forth in paragraphs numbered and 6", aye designated "1", “2”, “9” and “10” of the plaintiff's Complaint. 2. Admits the allegation in paragraph numbered and designated “3” that the defendant, QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC. was the owner of an automobile bearing registration number 88668MA, State of New York. 3. Admits the allegation in paragraph numbered and designated “4” that the defendant KENNETH DUPAS was the operator of an automobile bearing registration number 88668MA, State of New York. 4 Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs numbered and designated wor 5 and “8” of plaintiff's Complaint and respectfully requests all questions of law be referred to the Court. lof 5 5 Denies each and every paragraph numbered and designated “11” and “13” as to defendants QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC. and KENNETH DUPAS of the plaintiff's ( omplaint and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs numbered and designated “11” and “13” as to co-defendant s7 MARIE POINT-DU-JOUR and PIERRE W. HECTOR, of plaintiff’s Complaint 6 Denies each and every paragraph numbered and designated “12”, 14", “15” and “16” of the plaintiff’s Complaint AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 7 That whatever 1i acies or damages the plaintiff may have sustained were caused, in whole or in part, by the culpable conduct of the plaintiff, or the risks which were assumed by the plaintiff. AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 8. That by failing and neglecting to exercise ordinary care in making use of seat belts, the plaintiff acted unreasonably and in disregard of her own best interest and that all or a portion of her injuries could have been eliminated or minimized by the exercise of reasonable conduct and the use of seat belts. AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 9. That the obligations and/or liability of the answering defendants is governed by Article 16 of the Civil Practice Laws and Rules. 20f 5 AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 7 ead 10. Defendants hy eby 1 in mitigation and in reduction of any recovery by plaintiff against any and all defendants, including the answer g d ndant, the amount paid to plaintiff by any settling tortfeasor or tortfeasors, as per General Obligations Law §15-108. AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 11. That one or more of the plaintiff’s claims may be barred or reduced because of the failure of the plaintiff to mitigate, minimize and/or avoid damages AS AND FOR A CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS, MARIE POINT~DU-JOUR and PIERRE W. HECTOR 12. If plaintiff sustained damages in the manner alleged in the complaint, all of wh is denied by the answering defendants, such damages were caused by.reason of the negligence and/or breach of contract of the co-defendants above named. 13. By reason of the foregoing, the answering defendants are entitled to contribution and/or indemnification from, and to have judgment over against, the co-defendants above named, for all part of any verdict of judgment that plaintiff may recover against the answering defendants. WHEREFORE, the answering defendants demand judgment dismissing the Complaint together with the costs and disbursements of this action. Dated: Poughkeepsie, NY April 1, 2016 3 0f 5 Yours, etc., LaROSE & LaROSE, ESQS. Attorneys for Defendants QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC. and KENNETH DUPAS 510 Haight Avenue Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 (845) 454-2001 TO HARMON, LINDER & ROG! ISKY, ESQS Attorneys for Pla 3 Park Avenue, S e 2300 New York, New York 10016 (212) 732-3665 4 of 5 ATTORNEY'S VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DUTCHESS) I, Keith V. LaRose, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New York State, state that I am a partner of the law firm of LaRose & LaRose, attorneys of record for the defendants KENNETH DUPAS and QUALITY WHOLESALE, INC., in the within action; I have read the foregoing Answer and know the contents thereof; the same is true to the best of my knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as tc those matters I believe it to be true. The reason this verification is made by me and not by the defendant is because the defendant does not reside in this county. The grounds for my belief as to all matters not stated upon my own knowledge are as follows: Client interview and review of the file. Dated: April 4 , 2016 Poughkeepsie, NY KEITH ROSE 5 of 5