Preview
FORM 1.997. CIVIL COVER SHEET
The civil cover sheet and the information contained in it neither replace nor supplement the filing
and service of pleadings or other documents as required by law. This form must be filed by the
plaintiff or petitioner with the Clerk of Court for the purpose of reporting uniform data pursuant
to section 25.075, Florida Statutes. (See instructions for completion.)
STYLE
IN THE CIRCUIT/COUNTY COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
L
IMPACT MEDICAL GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff Case
IA
2024SC005147
Judge
C
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
I
Defendant
FFAMOUNT OF CLAIM
Please indicate the estimated amount of the claim, rounded to the nearest dollar. The estimated amount of
O
the claim is requested for data collection and clerical processing purposes only. The amount of the claim
shall not be used for any other purpose.
N
less
over U TYPE OF (If the case fits more than one type of case, select the most
definitive category.) If the most descriptive label is a subcategory (is indented under a broader
category), place an x on both the main category and subcategory lines.
CIRCUIT CIVIL
Condominium
Contracts and indebtedness
Eminent domain
Auto negligence
Negligence—other
Business governance
Business torts
Environmental/Toxic tort
Third party indemnification
Construction defect
Mass tort
Negligent security
L
Nursing home negligence
Premises liability—commercial
IA
Premises liability—residential
Products liability
C
Real Property/Mortgage foreclosure
I
Commercial foreclosure
Homestead residential foreclosure
F
Non-homestead residential foreclosure
Other real property actions
F
Professional malpractice
O
Malpractice—business
Malpractice—medical
Malpractice—other professional
N
Other
Antitrust/Trade regulation
U
Business transactions
Constitutional challenge—statute or ordinance
Constitutional challenge—proposed amendment
Corporate trusts
Discrimination—employment or other
Insurance claims
Intellectual property
Libel/Slander
Shareholder derivative action
Securities litigation
Trade secrets
Trust litigation
COUNTY CIVIL
Small Claims up to
Civil
Real property/Mortgage foreclosure
Replevins
Evictions
Residential Evictions
Non-residential Evictions
Other civil (non-monetary)
COMPLEX BUSINESS COURT
This action is appropriate for assignment to Complex Business Court as delineated and mandated by the
Administrative Order. Yes
REMEDIES SOUGHT (check all that apply):
Monetary;
L
Nonmonetary declaratory or injunctive relief;
IA
Punitive
NUMBER OF CAUSES OF ACTION: [
C
(Specify)
F I
IS THIS CASE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?
F
yes
O
HAS NOTICE OF ANY KNOWN RELATED CASE BEEN FILED?
N
yes If “yes,” list all related cases by name, case number, and court.
U
IS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT?
yes
DOES THIS CASE INVOLVE ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL ABUSE?
yes
I CERTIFY that the information I have provided in this cover sheet is accurate to the best of
my knowledge and belief, and that I have read and will comply with the requirements of
Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425.
Signature: s/ Thomas Joseph Wenzel Fla. Bar
Attorney party (Bar # if attorney)
Thomas Joseph Wenzel 07/05/2024
(type or print name) Date
Related Content
in Seminole County
Ruling
FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 23, 2024 |
FCS057573
FCS057573
Motions for Contempt
TENTATIVE RULING:
Petitioner’s “motions” for contempt are denied.
No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to the
court. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a
contempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court
(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Int’l Union v. Superior Court
(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)
Page 1 of 1
Ruling
Sara Norris vs Alonzo Marshall, et al.
Jul 29, 2024 |
20CV-01507
20CV-01507 Sara Norris v. Alonzo Marshall, et al.
Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal-Notice of Settlement
Appearance required. Remote appearances are permitted. Parties who wish to appear
remotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to arrange for a remote
appearance. Dismissal of Cross-Complaint only was filed on June 3, 2024. Appear to
address finalizing the settlement and filing a Dismissal of the complaint. Failure to
appear will result in a dismissal without prejudice of the complaint.
Ruling
HAMMERSTROM, BRUCE vs VASQUEZ, GEORGE
Jul 22, 2024 |
CV-23-007007
CV-23-007007 – HAMMERSTROM, BRUCE vs VASQUEZ, GEORGE – Defendant Charles Duke’s Motion to Quash Service of Summons – DENIED.
In view of Plaintiff’s filing of a supplementary proof of service by Virgina Lucas, a registered process server on 5/8/24 addressing errors on the original proof of service of the summons and complaint on Defendant herein, the Court finds that service of said summons and complaint on Defendant is proper. (Civ. Proc. Code § 418.10).
Furthermore, failure to serve a summons and complaint within sixty days does not render said service improper.
The Court notes that that a motion to quash brought past the stipulated 30 days does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to consider the merits of the motion and does not require denial of the motion. (Preciado v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation (2023) 87 Cal. App. 5th 964 review denied (May 3, 2023).)
The Court also notes that Plaintiff herein obtained the required order to file the instant action.
Defendant shall file his responsive pleading within fifteen (15) days of the Court’s order herein. (Civ. Proc. Code § 418.10 (b)).
Ruling
KIMBLE vs ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC
Jul 27, 2024 |
RIC1906176
Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint on
KIMBLE vs ALPHA PHI 4th Amended Complaint MYEASHA
RIC1906176
ALPHA FRATERNITY INC KIMBLE by MYEASHA KIMBLE,
WILLIAM HILLIARD
Tentative Ruling: These matters are off calendar as a Notice of Settlement was filed on
7/23/2024.
Ruling
Holley, et al. vs. Mercy Medical Center, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
22CV-0199965
HOLLEY, ET AL. VS. MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0199965
This matter is on calendar to confirm funding for a Special Needs Trust established for Kymani Holley. On July
25, 2024, Counsel filed proof of the creation of a special needs trust and the deposit of settlement funds into the
trust. Based on that proof, the case will be dropped from calendar. No appearance is necessary on today’s
calendar.
Ruling
COSSUTO VS. ESTATE OF MICHAELGARRETT, ET
Jul 25, 2024 |
CVPO21-0196776
COSSUTO VS. ESTATE OF MICHAEL GARRETT, ET AL
Case Number: CVPO21-0196776
This consolidated matter is on calendar for review regarding status of the case. The Court notes that a Request
for Dismissal was filed as to Katie Garrett’s Cross-Complaint on May 7, 2024, however, the Cross-Complaint
was not dismissed because a condition was listed in Item 1.b.(6) that cannot be imposed by the clerk. If the Cross-
Complaint is being dismissed, a new Request for Dismissal will need to be filed. If the Cross-Complaint is going
to proceed, the Nominal Wrongful Death Cross-Defendants will have to be defaulted or file responsive pleadings.
There is not valid service on Trevor Garrett. Katie Garrett is ORDERED to either dismiss or get her Cross-
Complaint at issue within 30 days today. Other than the issues above, the matter is at issue and the Court intends
to set the matter for trial before April 30, 2025. The Court notes that the matter was filed over three years ago
and finds it to be exempt from plan designation. Plaintiff and Defendant/Cross-Complainant Katie Garrett have
posted jury fees. The balance of the parties have not. The parties are granted ten days leave to post jury fees.
Failure to post jury fees within that time of today will be deemed a waiver of the right to a jury. The parties are
ordered to meet and confer prior to the hearing regarding proposed dates for trial. An appearance by all parties
is necessary on today’s calendar.
Ruling
RACHEL MERI DENOBLE VS. W HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC. ET AL
Jul 26, 2024 |
CGC24613280
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Friday, July 26, 2024, Line 16. DEFENDANT BATH AUTHORITY LLC DBA DREAMLINE's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Defendant Bath Authority LLC dba Dreamline's unopposed Motion to Strike Punitive Damages from the Complaint is granted. Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person should report to Dept. 301. However, anyone intending to appear remotely should use the regular Zoom information for Dept. 302's Law & Motion Calendar for 9:30 a.m. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the defendant is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RCE)