Preview
CM-010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Hootan Atefyekta, SBN 311437
Robert S. Cox, SBN 290268 Julie M. VanderNoor Urner, SBN 220178
Shane T. Wate, SBN 302738 Thomas J. Sebourn, SBN 279272
James P. Garrett, SBN 256060
SUTTELL & HAMMER, APC
P.O. Box C-90006
Bellevue, WA 98009
TELEPHONE NO.: (425) 455-8220/ (888) 788-8355 FAX NO. (Optional): (425) 453-3239 ELECTRONICALLY
E-MAIL ADDRESS: california@suttelllaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. FILED
Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
CA DFPI Debt Collector License No. 10604-99
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 07/02/2024
STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister Street, Room 103 Clerk of the Court
MAILING ADDRESS: BY: DAEJA ROGERS
CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Francisco CA 94102 Deputy Clerk
BRANCH NAME: Civic Center Courthouse
CASE NAME:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MEGAN DENKERS BACA
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASE NUMBER:
(X) Unlimited ( ) Limited [ ] Counter [ ] Joinder
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded Filed with first appearance by defendant JUDGE:
CGC-24-616078
exceeds $35,000) is $35,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
Items 1-6 must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
[ ] Auto (22) [ ] Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403)
[ ] Uninsured motorist (46) [ ( ) ] Rule 3.740 collections (09) [ ] Antitrust/Trade Regulations (03)
Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property [ (X) ] Other collections (09) [ ] Construction Defect (10)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort [ ] Insurance coverage (18) [ ] Mass Tort (40)
[ ] Asbestos (04) [ ] Other contract (37) [ ] Securities Litigation (28)
[ ] Product liability (24) Real Property [ ] Environmental/Toxic Tort (30)
[ ] Medical malpractice (45) [ ] Eminent domain/inverse [ ] Insurance Coverage Claims arising from the
[ ] Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort [ ] Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
[ ] Business tort/unfair business practice (07) [ ] Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
[ ] Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer [ ] Enforcement of judgment (20)
[ ] Defamation (13) [ ] Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
[ ] Fraud (16) [ ] Residential (32) [ ] RICO (27)
[ ] Intellectual Property (19) [ ] Drugs (38) [ ] Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
[ ] Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition
[ ] Other non-PI/PD/WD Tort (35) [ ] Asset forfeiture (05) [ ] Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Employment [ ] Petition re: arbitration award (11) [ ] Other petition (not specified above) (43)
[ ] Wrongful Termination (36) [ ] Writ of mandate (02)
[ ] Other Employment (15) [ ] Other judicial review (39)
2. This case [ ] is [ X ] is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If case is complex, mark the factors requiring
exceptional judicial management:
a. [ ] Large number of separately represented parties d. [ ] Large number of witnesses
b. [ ] Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. [ ] Coordination and related actions pending in one or more
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. [ ] Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. [ ] Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. [X] monetary b. [ ] nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. [ ] punitive
4. Number of causes on action (specify): 2
5. This case [ ] is [ X ] is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related cases. (You may use form CM-015.)
June 25, 2024
Dated ___________________________________
(X) Hootan Atefyekta, SBN 311437
( ) Robert S. Cox, SBN 290268 ( ) Thomas J. Sebourn, SBN 279272
( ) Shane T. Wate, SBN 302738 ( ) Julie M. VanderNoor Urner, SBN 220178
( ) James P. Garrett, SBN 256060 SignHere__
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OF ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate code,
Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions.
File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the
action or proceeding.
Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
Page 1 of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740;
Judicial Council of California Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
CM-010 [Rev. January 1, 2024) www.courts.ca.gov
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET CM-010
To Plaintiffs and Others Filing First Papers. If you are filing a first paper (for example, a complaint) in a civil case, you must
complete and file, along with you first paper, the Civil Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. This information will be used to compile
statistics about the types and numbers of cases filed. You must complete items 1 through 6 on the sheet. In item 1, you must check
one box for the case type that best describes the case. If the case fits both a general and a more specific type of case listed in item 1,
check the more specific one. If the case has multiple causes of action, check the box that best indicates the primary cause of action.
To assist you in completing the sheet, examples of the cases that belong under each case type in item 1 are provided below. A cover
sheet must be filed only with your initial paper. Failure to file a cover sheet with the first paper filed in a civil case may subject a party,
its counsel, or both to sanctions under rules 2.30 and 3.220 of the California Rules of Court.
To Parties in Rule 3.740 Collections Cases. A
Related Content
in San Francisco County
Ruling
KEEP AMERICA SAFE AND BEAUTIFUL VS. FLORAFLEX CORP. ET AL
Jul 24, 2024 |
CGC23603959
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 24, 2024, Line 2. DEFENDANT FLORAFLEX CORP.'s DEMURRER to COMPLAINT. Off calendar. The Cole declaration fails to describe the "means" by which the parties met and conferred, which CCP 430.41(a)(3)(A) requires. The parties are ordered to comply with the code. The response to the complaint is now due by August 23, 2024. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
CAILIN HARDELL VS. BLUMBERG CAPITAL ET AL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CGC22602112
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, Jul-25-2024, Line 3, PLAINTIFF CAILIN HARDELL'S Motion To Compel Further Discovery Of Documents And Information From Defendant Blumberg Capital L.L.C. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Parties to appear, hearing required. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)
Ruling
GAETANI REAL ESTATE VS. ZACHARY HOWITT ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 |
CUD23672769
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2024 line 5. DEFENDANT ZACHARY HOWITT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Hearing Required. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.
Ruling
ESTEBAN SAMORA SERRANO VS. ANTOLINI LUIGI&C. S.P.A. ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 |
CGC24614333
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Monday, July 22, 2024, Line 9. 2 - DEFENDANT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Granted in part. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)
Ruling
BRITTNEY PATTERSON VS. BAY AREA PL SERVICES D/B/A BAYPLS, A CALIFORNIA ET AL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CGC23608916
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, Jul-25-2024, Line 6, 4-PLAINTIFF BRITTNEY PATTERSON , AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Subpoena For Production Of Business Records To Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento Medical Center. Off calendar per plaintiff's notice of dismissal filed July 3, 2024. (D302)
Ruling
JAIRO REGALADO CANCHOLA ET AL VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC, ET AL
Jul 26, 2024 |
CGC23610505
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, Jul-26-2024, Line 9, 2-PLAINTIFFS JAIRO CANCHOLA AN INDIVIDUAL, and ANDREA RODRIGUEZ' Motion To Compel Responses, Without Objections, To Plaintiffs' Requests For Production Of Documents (Set One). Continued on the court's motion to August 21, 2024. (D302)
Ruling
MARCUS NUNES VS. MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), INC., A ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 |
CGC23608047
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Monday, July 22, 2024, Line 3. DEFENDANT MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), INC. AND MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), LLC's Motion To Stay. Off calendar. Motion withdrawn on July 8, 2024. =(302/CK)