Preview
IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION
vs.
Civil Action No. 23-C-08599-S6
FRANK GRANT MOON,
Defendant.
ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
CAME TO BE HEARD, the Plaintiff, upon its Motion for Default Judgment, and it:appearing to the Court that:
1 ‘The Summons and Complaint have been duly served upon the Defendant as appears of record, and the Court has acquired personal jurisdiction
over the Defendant;
The time within which the Defendant was to Answer the Complaint has expired, and no Answer to the Complaint has been filed by the
Defendant, and the Defendant is therefore in Default pursuant to O.C.G.A. §9-11-55;
More than fifteen (15) days has clapsed since the Default of the Defendant, and.the Default-of the Defendant has not been reopened as a matter
of right or by Order of this Court;
This civil action is for liquidated damages upon.ani account, as shown in the Exhibits to the Complaint.
The Defendant has not tendered payment in full of the principal and interest claimed within ten (10) days of written notice being served upon
such Defendant, and the Plaintiff is accordingly entitled to'an award of reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to O.C.G.A. §13-1-L1.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
Judgment shall be entered in favor of the Plaintiff, and against the Defendant, FRANK GRANT MOON, as follows:
Principal Amount $19,070.17
Attorney's Fees $1,932.01 15% of principal balance up to $500; 10% of all amounts above $500:
Court Costs $348.70
Total Judgment $21,350.88
Plaintiff disclaims any post-judgment interest,
SO ORDERED, This the day of 20.
State Court of Gwinnett County
Pres Judge Presiding
Ayanna KAbrams, Bar #: 466513
__Cullan M. Demianezyk, Bar #: 433198
__Donald Joseph Whittemore, Bar #: 183918
Brock & Scott, PLLC
1315 Westbrook Plaza Drive
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Telephone: (336) 354-1797
Telefax: (336) 354-1588
gacolservice@brockandscott.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
Related Content
in Gwinnett County
Ruling
Salen's Landscaping, Inc. vs Smith Development and Construction Company, Inc,
Jul 29, 2024 |
23CV-01838
23CV-01838 Salen’s Landscaping, Inc. v. Smith Development and Construction
Company, Inc.
Default Prove-Up
Appearance required on all matters. Remote appearances are permitted. Parties who
wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to arrange
for a remote appearance.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF MERCED
Limited Civil
Hon. Mason Brawley
Courtroom 9
627 W. 21st Street, Merced
Monday, July 29, 2024
1:30 p.m.
The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives
notice of intention to appear as follows:
1. You must call (209) 725-4111 to notify the court of your intent to appear.
2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear.
Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will
result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying Court Call (the court’s telephonic appearance
provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.
IMPORTANT: Court Reporters will NOT be provided; parties wanting a hearing
transcript must make their own arrangements.
Case No. Title / Description
Ruling
VARGAS vs LUIS I. BUSTILLOS
Jul 24, 2024 |
CVPS2402197
Motion to Compel Arbitration by ALMA
CVPS2402197 VARGAS vs LUIS I. BUSTILLOS
ROSA VARGAS
Tentative Ruling: Parties to appear.
Ruling
ENRIQUEZ, HECTOR vs SPRUELL, JAMIKA
Jul 28, 2024 |
CV-24-003735
CV-24-003735 – ENRIQUEZ, HECTOR vs SPRUELL, JAMIKA – Defendant’s Motion for leave to File-Cross-Complaint - GRANTED, and unopposed.
The Court GRANTS Defendant’s unopposed motion for leave to file her cross-complaint. Defendant is ordered to file a copy of the proposed cross-complaint (attached as Exhibit 1 to the 6/27/24 Declaration of Megan D. Johnson) within five court days. The cross-complaint shall be served by August 30, 2024. Defendant is further ordered to submit a proposed order that comports with this ruling within five court days.
Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.
Ruling
The Golden 1 Credit Union vs. Carter, Jermaine et al
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0052507
S-CV-0052507 The Golden 1 Credit Union vs. Carter, Jermaine et al
No appearance required. CMC is continued to 10/28/24 at 2pm in Dept. 6.
Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading, default or dismissal as to
Defendant(s): Carter, Jermaine; The State of California
Ruling
JAMES BRADY III VS. SUNRUN, INC. ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC23606778
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 5. DEFENDANT SUNRUN INC.'s MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND. The motion is granted as unopposed. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)
Ruling
THE GRAY CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY VS GRAFF LOGISTICS LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
Jul 29, 2024 |
24STCV04091
Case Number:
24STCV04091
Hearing Date:
July 29, 2024
Dept:
71
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE RULING
THE GRAY CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY,
vs.
GRAFF LOGISTICS LLC, et al.
Case No.:
24STCV04091
Hearing Date:
July 29, 2024
Plaintiff The Gray Casualty & Surety Companys Request for Default Judgment
Having considered all documents submitted in support of a default judgment, the Court rules as follows:
Background
On February 20, 2024, The Gray Casualty & Surety Company (Plaintiff) filed its initial Complaint against Defendants Graff Logistics LLC and Armine Darebidyan aka Darbidyan.
On April 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint against Defendants Graff Logistics LLC and Edgar Elizarov for goods and services sold and delivered, account stated, open book account, and breach of written contract.
On July 15, 2024, Plaintiff dismissed Graff Logistics LLC from the operative first amended complaint.
On July 10, 2024, the clerk entered default against Defendant Edgar Elizarov.
On July 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Court Judgment to be heard on July 29, 2024.
Partys Request
Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a default judgment against Defendant Edgar Elizarov
and award Plaintiff $73,819.88 consisting of $62,112.50 as the demand of the first amended complaint, $9,070.13 in prejudgment interest, $2,132.25 in attorneys fees, and $505.00 in costs.
Discussion
Plaintiff submitted a completed default judgment packet, with all applicable attachments. The Court finds sufficient evidence to justify the requested award and grants Plaintiffs request in full.
Conclusion
The application for default judgment filed on July 18, 2024, is granted.
Judgment of
$73,819.88
is entered against Defendant Edgar Elizarov.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Dated:
July _____, 2024
Hon. Daniel M. Crowley
Judge of the Superior Court
Ruling
EASTERN FUNDING LLC vs PATEL TOWING LLC a)
Jul 24, 2024 |
CV-24-003737
CV-24-003737 – EASTERN FUNDING LLC vs PATEL TOWING LLC – a) Plaintiff’s Application for Writ of Possession as to Defendant Patel Towing LLC; b) Plaintiff’s Application for Writ of Possession as to Defendant Leonard Lal Patel -
Â
a-b) DENIED, without prejudice.
No proof of service has been submitted.
THE COURT’S PHONE SYSTEM IS DOWN. If you desire a hearing, you must email your request to the court before 4:00 p.m. today. In addition, your email must list the email addresses of all counsel who will appear at the hearing. Upon receipt, the court will schedule a Zoom hearing.