Preview
NO. 23DCV309666
IN THE MATTER OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT
THE MARRIAGE OF
ALTHEA PHILLIPS EDWARDS 328TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
DARREN LAMAR EDWARDS FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS
DECLARATION TO PROVE UP AGREED FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE
My name is ALTHEA PHILLIPS EDWARDS. I am above the age of eighteen years,
and I am fully competent to make this declaration. The facts stated in this declaration are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
I am the Petitioner in this case. DARRE LAMAR EDWARDS is my spouse.
At the time I filed this suit for divorce, I had been a domiciliary of Texas for the
preceding six months and a resident of this county for the preceding ninety days.
My spouse and I were married on or about June 6, 1987 and ased to live together as
spouses on or about August 2023.
The marriage has become insupportable because of discord or conflict of personalities
between my spouse and me that destroys the legitimate ends of the marriage relationship and
prevents any reas able expectation of reconciliation.
No children were born or adopted during this marriage and none is expected.
My spouse and I have reached an agreement regarding the division of the community
estate, both assets and liabilities of the marriage, which s set forth in an agreement signed by my
spouse and me that is filed with the Court. The proposed division of the community estate is a
just and right division of that Estate.
An agreement signed by my spouse and me that is filed with the Court contain
ITMOTMO Althea Philli Edwards and Darren Lamar Edwards
Declaration to Prove up Agreed Decree
Page of
description of property that my spouse and I agree is my separate property.
My spouse and I ask the Court to change my name from ALTHEA PHILLIPS-
EDWARDS to ALTHEA PHILLIPS, a former name of mine.
My spouse and I, as well my attorney, have signed the proposed Final Decree of Divorce
and the agreement incident to divorce that is filed with the Court. I recognize my spouse's
signature where it appears on these documents. I respectfully ask the Court to grant this divorce
and approve all the agreements my spouse and I have made in them.
Rance PLaps
Lp des
Ib Maswauxq3sIDgbVLNGaHZaMs
ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, Declarant
My name is ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, my date of birth is and my
address is United States. I declare
under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed in FORT BEND County, Texas, on
(Cesc
ID Mé9Mauxq3JI0qbVLNGaHZaMs
ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, Declarant
ITMOTMO Althea Phillips-Edwards and Darren Lamar Edwards
Declaration to Prove up Agreed Decree
Page 2 of 2
Related Content
in Fort Bend County
Ruling
BRIMHALL VS BRIMHALL
Jul 23, 2024 |
FL-18-000951
FL-18-000951 – BRIMHALL VS BRIMHALL Petitioner’s Request for Order re Change Venue—DENIED, without prejudice.
There is no proof of service on file as required. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.94(b).)
This is a dissolution case in which a status-only judgment was filed on July 3, 2021, but no judgment on reserved issues has been entered, and Petitioner’s counsel recently withdrew. Accordingly, individual party service of Respondent is mandatory and jurisdictional. (Fam. Code, § 215(a).)
That said, the parties’ Stipulation and Order of January 8, 2021, resolved Petitioner’s move-away request and resulted in an agreed move of Petitioner and the minor child to the county of San Diego. Further, Petitioner alleges that Respondent no longer resides in this forum. If true, then the Court has authority to transfer the case as requested to San Diego County based on the convenience of the parties and the ends of justice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 397.5.)
The Court is inclined to grant the request based on this authority, but Respondent must either be properly served or else Respondent must personally appear and waive service. Petitioner may attempt to demonstrate good cause to continue the hearing to obtain service of Respondent; otherwise, the request will be denied without prejudice and Petitioner will need to file and serve a new order request.
Ruling
Metzger, Sr. vs. Metzger, Jr., et al.
Jul 25, 2024 |
22CV-0201077
METZGER, SR. VS. METZGER, JR., ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0201077
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on May 28, 2024 by Judge Boeckman, pursuant to Gov’t Code §
68608(b) to Plaintiff and Counsel for failure to cure the defects noted by the Court on February
20, 2024. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the OSC. However, proof of service has been filed
indicating that the Second Amended Complaint has been served on all parties. The OSC is
DISCHARGED. No appearance is necessary on the 8:30 a.m. calendar. The Court confirms
today’s 9:00 a.m. review hearing.
Ruling
Flores vs. Hudson
Jul 27, 2024 |
24CV-0204646
FLORES VS. HUDSON
Case Number: 24CV-0204646
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Sanctions issued on June 13, 2024, to Plaintiff Eladio Flores, in pro per, for failure to timely serve
pleadings on Defendant Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson (Katy Perry) pursuant to California Rules of
Court, Rule 3.110(b). “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of
service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the
complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on March 29, 2024, and no
proof of service has been filed. Plaintiff did not file a written response to the Order to Show Cause.
With no sufficient excuse for the delay, sanctions are imposed in the amount of $250.00 against
Plaintiff. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate Order of Sanctions. The Court will issue an
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal pursuant to Gov’t Code Section 68608(b) for Plaintiff’s failure
to timely serve the complaint. The hearing on the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal is set for
Monday, September 9, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 64. The clerk is instructed to prepare
a separate Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. This matter is also calendared on Monday,
September 9, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 64 for review regarding status of service.
Ruling
JACKSON VS JACKSON
Jul 22, 2024 |
FL-23-002067
FL-23-002067 – JACKSON VS JACKSON
Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Sell Family Residence,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED.
This is a continued hearing. It appears that the request regarding the 1972 Chevrolet Pickup Truck has been resolved or is moot. Likewise, this appears to be the case with the request regarding the marital residence because Respondent is not opposed to sale provided that sufficient time before listing and sale is extended in order to conduct repairs necessary to obtain full value and as short a time on market as possible. (Respondent’s Supplemental Declaration.) The Court will reserve jurisdiction over the question of attorney’s fees and costs until disposition of the marital residence. Counsel are to meet and confer prior to the hearing as to a reasonable time for repairs to be completed and any other disputes that are within the scope of the pending order request. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.98.)
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge David I. Hood in Department #25:
Ruling
In Re: Tabag
Jul 25, 2024 |
24CV-0204603
IN RE: TABAG
Case Number: 24CV-0204603
Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Ramsey Anthony Viloria Tabag
also known as Ramsey C. Viloria seeks to change his name to Ramsey Viloria. All procedural
requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied. The Petition is GRANTED. All future
dates will be vacated, and the file closed upon the processing of the Decree Changing Name.
Ruling
Metzger, Sr. vs. Metzger, Jr., et al.
Jul 23, 2024 |
22CV-0201077
METZGER, SR. VS. METZGER, JR., ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0201077
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on May 28, 2024 by Judge Boeckman, pursuant to Gov’t Code §
68608(b) to Plaintiff and Counsel for failure to cure the defects noted by the Court on February
20, 2024. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the OSC. However, proof of service has been filed
indicating that the Second Amended Complaint has been served on all parties. The OSC is
DISCHARGED. No appearance is necessary on the 8:30 a.m. calendar. The Court confirms
today’s 9:00 a.m. review hearing.
Ruling
AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA
Jul 24, 2024 |
FL-24-000399
FL-24-000399 – AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA Respondent’s Request for Order re Discovery—HEARING REQUIRED.
After review of the papers and pleadings, the Court finds that a discovery dispute has arisen that appears amenable to resolution without a contested hearing. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to set an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) under the auspices of a Family Centered Case Resolution Plan, and to stay determination of the present motion and any other pending discovery disputes until completion of the IDC. (Fam. Code, §§ 2450(a), 2451(a)(3); Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.83(c)(6)(D),(E).) The parties shall appear and may be heard on the IDC and, if ordered, to schedule the IDC at the earliest mutual availability of counsel and the IDC officer.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
Ruling
AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA
Jul 23, 2024 |
FL-24-000399
FL-24-000399 – AGUAYO-MARTINEZ VS ZARAGOZA Respondent’s Request for Order re Discovery—HEARING REQUIRED.
After review of the papers and pleadings, the Court finds that a discovery dispute has arisen that appears amenable to resolution without a contested hearing. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to set an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) under the auspices of a Family Centered Case Resolution Plan, and to stay determination of the present motion and any other pending discovery disputes until completion of the IDC. (Fam. Code, §§ 2450(a), 2451(a)(3); Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.83(c)(6)(D),(E).) The parties shall appear and may be heard on the IDC and, if ordered, to schedule the IDC at the earliest mutual availability of counsel and the IDC officer.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13:
THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sweena Pannu in Department #14:
Preview
NO. 23DCV309666 IN THE MATTER OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT THE MARRIAGE OF ALTHEA PHILLIPS EDWARDS 328TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DARREN LAMAR EDWARDS FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS DECLARATION TO PROVE UP AGREED FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE My name is ALTHEA PHILLIPS EDWARDS. I am above the age of eighteen years, and I am fully competent to make this declaration. The facts stated in this declaration are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct. I am the Petitioner in this case. DARRE LAMAR EDWARDS is my spouse. At the time I filed this suit for divorce, I had been a domiciliary of Texas for the preceding six months and a resident of this county for the preceding ninety days. My spouse and I were married on or about June 6, 1987 and ased to live together as spouses on or about August 2023. The marriage has become insupportable because of discord or conflict of personalities between my spouse and me that destroys the legitimate ends of the marriage relationship and prevents any reas able expectation of reconciliation. No children were born or adopted during this marriage and none is expected. My spouse and I have reached an agreement regarding the division of the community estate, both assets and liabilities of the marriage, which s set forth in an agreement signed by my spouse and me that is filed with the Court. The proposed division of the community estate is a just and right division of that Estate. An agreement signed by my spouse and me that is filed with the Court contain ITMOTMO Althea Philli Edwards and Darren Lamar Edwards Declaration to Prove up Agreed Decree Page of description of property that my spouse and I agree is my separate property. My spouse and I ask the Court to change my name from ALTHEA PHILLIPS- EDWARDS to ALTHEA PHILLIPS, a former name of mine. My spouse and I, as well my attorney, have signed the proposed Final Decree of Divorce and the agreement incident to divorce that is filed with the Court. I recognize my spouse's signature where it appears on these documents. I respectfully ask the Court to grant this divorce and approve all the agreements my spouse and I have made in them. Rance PLaps Lp des Ib Maswauxq3sIDgbVLNGaHZaMs ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, Declarant My name is ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, my date of birth is and my address is United States. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in FORT BEND County, Texas, on (Cesc ID Mé9Mauxq3JI0qbVLNGaHZaMs ALTHEA PHILLIPS-EDWARDS, Declarant ITMOTMO Althea Phillips-Edwards and Darren Lamar Edwards Declaration to Prove up Agreed Decree Page 2 of 2