Preview
-
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
SSBARNSTAGLE, SS. TRIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
CIVILDOCKETNO. 2472CV00235
Jacqueline Ramixe2-FRanipy, SUPERIOR COURT
BARNSTABLE, SS
v.
Demoulas Super Maxke tS end Arts) JUN 12 2024
FILED
SUMMONS
Andrea S. Batchelder, W, fickerson, Clerk
Re
THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO 22 Shattuck Street . (Defendant’s name)
Lowell, MA 07852
You are being sued. The Plaintiff(s) named above has started a lawsuit against you. A copy of the
Plaintiff's Complaint filed against you is attached to this summons and the original complaint has been
filed in the Barnstable Superior Court. YOU MUST ACT PROMPTLY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.
You must respond to this lawsuit in writing within 20 days. If you do not respond, the court may decide
y the case against you and award the Plaintiff everything asked for in the complaint. You will also lose the
opportunity to tell your side of the story. You must respond to this lawsuit in writing even if you expect
to resolve this matter with the Plaintiff. If you need more time to respond, you may request an
extension of time in writing from the Court.
How to Respond. To respond to this lawsuit, you must file a written response with the court and mail a
copy to the Plaintiff's Attorney (or the Plaintiff, if unrepresented). You can do this by:
Filing your signed original response with the Clerk's Office for Civil Business, Superior Court,
by, mail or in-person ta: 3195. Main Street, Barnstable, MA 02630
Delivering or mailing a copy of your response to the Plaintiff's Attorney/Plaintiff at the following
address:PO_ Box 2938, Hyannis, MA 02604
What to include in your response. An “Answer” is ane type of response to a Complaint. Your Answer
must state whether you agree or disagree with the fact(s) alleged in each paragraph of the Complaint.
Some defenses, called affirmative defenses, must be stated in your Answer or you may lose your right to
use them in court. ff you have any claims against the Plaintiff (referred to as counterclaims) that are
based on the same facts or transaction described in the Complaint, then you must iriclude those claims
in your Answer. Otherwise, you may lose your right to sue the Plaintiff about anything related to this
lawsuit. If you want to have your case heard by a jury, you must specifically request a jury trial in your
Answer or in a written demand for a jury trial that you must send to the other side and file with the
court no more than 10 days after sending your Answer. You can also respond to a Complaint by filing a
“Motion to Dismiss,” if you believe that the complaint is legally invalid or legally insufficient. A Motion
to Dismiss must be based on one of the legal deficiencies or reasons listed under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12. If
you are filing a Motion to Dismiss, you must also comply with the filing procedures for “Civil Motions”
described in the rules of the Court in which the complaint was filed, available at
www.mass.gov.courts/case-legal-res/rules of court.
nae
Lega] Assistance. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you cannot get legal help, some ba:
information for people who represent themselves is available at www.mass.gov/courts/selfhelp.
Required information on all filings: The “civil docket number” appearing at the top of this notice is+
case number assigned to this case and must appear on the front of your Answer or Motion to Dismiss.
You should refer to yourselfas the “Defendant.”
Witness Hon. Judith Fabricant, Chief Justice on June 2024 __ (SEAL)
Scott W. Nickerson
Clerk-Magistrate
Note: The number assigned to the Complaint by the Clerk-Magistrate at the beginning ofthe lawsult should be indicated on the
summons before it is served on the Defendant.
PROOF OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
I hereby certify that on 20. I served’a copy of this summons,
together with a copy of the complaint in this action, on the defendant named in this summons, in the
following manner (See Mass. R. Civ. P. 4 (d)(1-5)}:
Dated: 20. J Signature:
NLB. TO PROCESS SERVER:
PLEASE ENTER THE DATE THAT YOU MADE SERVICE ON THE DEFENDANT IN THIS BOX— BOTH
ON THE ORIGINAL SUMMONS AND ON THE COPY OF THE SUMMONS SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT.
RETURN OF SERVICE
Summons, Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, Civil Action Cover Sheet
Case Number: 2472CV00235
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ramirez-Frazier
VS.
Defendant:
Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., d/b/a Market Basket
Received these papers to be served on Andrea S. Batchelder, Registered Agent, 22 Shattuck Street,
Lowell, MA.
|, AAA Constables, do hereby affirm that on the 10th day of June, 2024 at 2:35 pm, I:
Served Summons, Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, Civil Action Cover Sheet IN HAND to
Susan Warnock as Agent for Andrea S. Batchelder, Registered Agent at the address of 22 Shattuck
Street, Loweil, MA,
| certify that | am over the age of 18, and have no interest in the above action.
nstables
Consfable/Process Server
Our Job Serial Number: CNB-2024001021
Copyright © 1992-2024 DreamBulll Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V
Related Content
in Barnstable County
Ruling
CHINA LIVE VENTURES LIMITED, L.P. VS. 644 BROADWAY LLC ET AL
Jul 24, 2024 |
CGC21590574
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 24, 2024 line 1. OTHER GREGG WILLIAMS NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE is GRANTED. Receiver to file a complaint/cross-complaint in intervention forthwith. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.
Ruling
JONATHAN HARMS VS. A16 ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC20584047
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 2. PETITIONER JONATHAN HARMS' Motion For Attorneys Fees And Costs. Granted as unopposed. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)
Ruling
Gjetley vs. Sandoval
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-0203634
GJETLEY VS. SANDOVAL
Case Number: 23CV-0203634
Tentative Ruling on Discovery Motions: Defendant Gary Sandoval moves for an order deeming Defendant’s
Requests for Admissions, Set One admitted based on a lack of response from Plaintiff. In a separate motion,
Defendant moves for an order compelling responses to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special
Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Production, Set One. The motions were originally noticed for a hearing
on June 10, 2024. On June 10, 2024, the Court continued the hearing to today’s date because Plaintiff Lester
Gjetley had filed a document titled “Plaintiff Lester Gjetley Response to Motion and Discovery” that included a
copy of what appear to be verified responses to Requests for Admissions, Set One and Special Interrogatories,
Set One. Plaintiff was ordered to serve Defendant with these responses. It is unclear if that has occurred. On July
15, 2024, as directed by the Court, Defendant filed a Brief Statement Regarding Outstanding Discovery Issues.
This Statement is not supported by evidence. There are procedural and evidentiary defects on both sides of these
motions. The Court exercises its discretion to consider the merits of the motions despite these defects.
A party has thirty days after service to respond to a Request for Production, Request for Admissions, Form
Interrogatories, or Special Interrogatories. See CCP §§ 2031.260(a), 2033.250(a), and 2030.260(a). Not
providing a timely response to propounded discovery results in a waiver of objections. CCP §§ 2031.300(a).
2033.280(a), and 2030.290(a). If a party to whom a discovery request is directed fails to serve a timely response,
the party propounding discovery may move for an order compelling a response. CCP §§ 2031.300(b) and
2030.290(c). For Request for Admissions specifically, the party can move for an Order that the Request for
Admissions be deemed admitted. CCP § 2033.280(b). “The court shall make this order, unless it finds that the
party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a
proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220.” CCP
§ 2033.280(c).
Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Truth of Facts.
Requests for Admissions. Plaintiff filed verified response to Requests for Admissions, Set One on May 28, 2024.
Plaintiff was ordered to serve these on Defendant. It is unclear whether Plaintiff did so as there is no proof of
service. However, the Court made it clear in its June 10, 2024, tentative ruling that a response to Requests for
Admissions, Set One had been filed. Even if these responses may have not been served prior to the June 10, 2024,
hearing, they were filed and available in the court file. Defendant presented no argument regarding whether the
Requests for Admissions responses were in substantial compliance. As Plaintiff filed verified responses prior to
the hearing, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for the Defendant’s Requests for Admissions, Set One to be
admitted. It is mandatory that the Court impose a monetary sanction on the party whose failure to serve a timely
response to requests for admission necessitated this motion. CCP § 2033.280(c). The Court imposes monetary
sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $585 which is comprised of a $60 filing fee and three hours of attorney
time at $175 per hour.
Motion for Order Compelling Plaintiff to Answer Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Respond to
Request for Production.
Form Interrogatories. It appears from Defendant’s Statement filed on July 15, 2024 that verified responses were
provided as Defendant wrote, “but his verified response to Form Interrogatory 11.0 omits any mention of this
suit.” A lack of service of verified responses is what the original motion alleged. If Plaintiff has served verified
responses and Defendant deems them to be insufficient, Defendant may file a motion compelling further responses
after sufficient meet and confer efforts. In order for the Court to rule on such a motion, the Form Interrogatories
and responses would need to be provided to the Court. As it appears that Plaintiff responded to Form
Interrogatories, Set One, the Court DENIES this request as moot. If the Court is incorrect and Plaintiff did not
serve responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, Defendant may raise the issue at the hearing.
Special Interrogatories. Verified responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One were filed by Plaintiff on May 28,
2024. As discussed above regarding the Requests for Admissions, these were in the court file. If Defendant
deems the response to be insufficient, Defendant may file a motion compelling further responses after sufficient
meet and confer efforts. As Plaintiff responded to Special Interrogatories, Set One, the Court DENIES this request
as moot.
Request for Production. It appears from Defendant’s Statement that Plaintiff has not formally responded to
Request for Production, Set One but did provide some documents. Despite a partial production, Defendant
maintains that many records in possession or available to Plaintiff have not been provided. The Court finds good
cause for each of the categories listed in Request for Production, Set One. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED as
to the Request for Production. Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide a verified response to Request for Production,
Set One and produce all responsive records within twenty days of the filing of the Notice of Entry of Order.
Sanctions. CCP §§ 2031.300(c) and 2030.290(c) only provide for sanctions when an unsuccessful opposition is
made, however, the Court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to
compel discovery even when no opposition was filed. CRC 3.1348. As it appears that Plaintiff has still not served
a verified response to Request for Production, Set One, the Court finds that sanctions are appropriate. The Court
imposes monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $410 which is comprised of a $60 filing fee and
two hours of attorney time. The third hour requested is not awarded as time to attend the hearing has already been
accounted for in Defendant’s Motion for Order Deeming Truth of Facts.
In the Statement filed by Defendant on July 15, 2024, Defendant requested that Plaintiff be ordered to sit for
another deposition at Plaintiff’s expense. This request is not properly before the Court and will not be addressed.
Defendant did not provide proposed Orders as required by Local Rule of Court 5.17(D). Defendant is to provide
a proposed Order for each motion that is consistent with the Court’s ruling.
Ruling
Dent vs. Dent
Jul 25, 2024 |
22EA-0200030
DENT VS. DENT
Case Number: 22EA-0200030
This matter is trailing the Dent Trust matter. (Case No. CVPV21-0031299). That matter is being
continued to September 30, 2024. Based on the foregoing, this matter is likewise continued to Monday,
September 30, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 to trail the trust matter. No appearance is
necessary on today’s calendar.
Ruling
MILLER vs KPC GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTERS, INC
Jul 25, 2024 |
CVSW2301539
MILLER VS KPC GLOBAL
CVSW2301539 MOTIONS TO COMPEL
MEDICAL CENTERS, INC
Tentative Ruling: GRANT all discovery motions—Verified responses, without objections, shall
be served within 30 days. GRANT $2,475.00 sanctions, payable within 30 days,
Ruling
ELESHA WELCH vs. 49ER VILLIAGE RV RESORT et al
Mar 11, 2024 |
24CV13526
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the tentative ruling requirements of Local Rule 4.03(D). On the court’s own motion, Plaintiff’s Motion to Correct the Complaint Filing Date for December 1, 2023 is continued to March 25, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 1. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended notice of motion complying with Local Rule 4.03(D). If a party intends to appear and contest the tentative ruling, they must notify the court by leaving a message at (209) 257-2692, and notify opposing counsel, no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day preceding the hearing. Unless a hearing is requested, this ruling is effective immediately. Neither further notice of the ruling nor a formal order per CRC 3.1312 is required. Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Correct the Complaint Filing Date for December 1, 2023 is GRANTED. The court will sign the proposed Amended Order lodged in the court file on March 13, 2024. If a party intends to appear and contest the tentative ruling, they must notify the court by leaving a message at (209) 257-2692, and notify opposing counsel, no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day preceding the hearing. Unless a hearing is requested, this ruling is effective immediately. Neither further notice of the ruling nor a formal order per CRC 3.1312 is required.
Ruling
Stephen Siefke vs Jimmy Dutra, Jr
Jul 23, 2024 |
22CV02174
22CV02174
SIEFKE v. DUTRA
DEFENDANT DUTRA’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER
RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET
THREE; FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; AND SPECIAL
INTERROGATORIES, SET FOUR
This case involves allegations of child sexual abuse by defendant. According to the
complaint, in the summer of 2005, plaintiff, then 12 years old, vacationed with defendant, then
30 years old, and his parents, in Southern California. It was during this trip that plaintiff alleges
he was molested by defendant.
Trial is set to begin on September 3, 2024. These motions were set on shortened time.
The motion is granted in part and denied in part, as discussed in detail below.
Defendant seeks to compel further responses to request for production of documents, set
three; special interrogatories, set four; and form interrogatories, set one.
Request for production, set three