Preview
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE 18TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
SEMINOLECOUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 2024SC005095
SPINE SPECIALISTS OF SOUTH
FLORIDA D/B/A SPINE AND
ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALISTS OF SOUTH
FLORIDA
(a/a/o Eric Jacquin)
L
Plaintiff,
IA
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
I C
Defendant.
____________________________________/
FF
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
The Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P.
NO
1.370, hereby requests that Defendant GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
admit in writing the truth of the matters set forth below on the forty fifth 45th) day after
1.
U
service of this Request with the Complaint/Petition:
Defendant maintains agents in SEMINOLE County, Florida to transact its
customary business in SEMINOLE County, Florida.
2. Eric Jacquin was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 04/27/2021.
3. Defendant issued an automobile insurance policy which provides Personal Injury
Protection benefits for Eric Jacquin for the accident referenced in Plaintiff’s complaint.
4. The policy describe din Plaintiff’s Request for Admission #3 was in full force and
effect for the subject accident.
5. Defendant received timely notice of a covered loss for the claim at issue in this case
and the notice was proper under the subject policy.
6. Defendant does not possess any documentation which waives Plaintiff’s right to
pursue the instant lawsuit.
7. Defendant has no meritorious defenses the Plaintiff’s lawsuit.
8. Defendant owes the Plaintiff more than $5.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
L
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was attached
IA
to the copy of the Summons and Complaint to be served by process on the Defendant.
F I C STEINGER, GREENE& FEINER
F
/s/ Thomas J. Wenzel
THOMAS J. WENZEL, ESQUIRE
Fla. Bar No.: 104117
O
133 NW 100th Avenue
Plantation, FL 33324
N
Telephone: 954 491 7701
Fax Number: 954 634 8312
U
Service: pleadings@injurylawyers.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Related Content
in Seminole County
Ruling
FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 23, 2024 |
FCS057573
FCS057573
Motions for Contempt
TENTATIVE RULING:
Petitioner’s “motions” for contempt are denied.
No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to the
court. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a
contempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court
(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Int’l Union v. Superior Court
(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)
Page 1 of 1
Ruling
Sara Norris vs Alonzo Marshall, et al.
Jul 29, 2024 |
20CV-01507
20CV-01507 Sara Norris v. Alonzo Marshall, et al.
Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal-Notice of Settlement
Appearance required. Remote appearances are permitted. Parties who wish to appear
remotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to arrange for a remote
appearance. Dismissal of Cross-Complaint only was filed on June 3, 2024. Appear to
address finalizing the settlement and filing a Dismissal of the complaint. Failure to
appear will result in a dismissal without prejudice of the complaint.
Ruling
HAMMERSTROM, BRUCE vs VASQUEZ, GEORGE
Jul 22, 2024 |
CV-23-007007
CV-23-007007 – HAMMERSTROM, BRUCE vs VASQUEZ, GEORGE – Defendant Charles Duke’s Motion to Quash Service of Summons – DENIED.
In view of Plaintiff’s filing of a supplementary proof of service by Virgina Lucas, a registered process server on 5/8/24 addressing errors on the original proof of service of the summons and complaint on Defendant herein, the Court finds that service of said summons and complaint on Defendant is proper. (Civ. Proc. Code § 418.10).
Furthermore, failure to serve a summons and complaint within sixty days does not render said service improper.
The Court notes that that a motion to quash brought past the stipulated 30 days does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to consider the merits of the motion and does not require denial of the motion. (Preciado v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation (2023) 87 Cal. App. 5th 964 review denied (May 3, 2023).)
The Court also notes that Plaintiff herein obtained the required order to file the instant action.
Defendant shall file his responsive pleading within fifteen (15) days of the Court’s order herein. (Civ. Proc. Code § 418.10 (b)).
Ruling
KIMBLE vs ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC
Jul 27, 2024 |
RIC1906176
Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint on
KIMBLE vs ALPHA PHI 4th Amended Complaint MYEASHA
RIC1906176
ALPHA FRATERNITY INC KIMBLE by MYEASHA KIMBLE,
WILLIAM HILLIARD
Tentative Ruling: These matters are off calendar as a Notice of Settlement was filed on
7/23/2024.
Ruling
Holley, et al. vs. Mercy Medical Center, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
22CV-0199965
HOLLEY, ET AL. VS. MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.
Case Number: 22CV-0199965
This matter is on calendar to confirm funding for a Special Needs Trust established for Kymani Holley. On July
25, 2024, Counsel filed proof of the creation of a special needs trust and the deposit of settlement funds into the
trust. Based on that proof, the case will be dropped from calendar. No appearance is necessary on today’s
calendar.
Ruling
COSSUTO VS. ESTATE OF MICHAELGARRETT, ET
Jul 25, 2024 |
CVPO21-0196776
COSSUTO VS. ESTATE OF MICHAEL GARRETT, ET AL
Case Number: CVPO21-0196776
This consolidated matter is on calendar for review regarding status of the case. The Court notes that a Request
for Dismissal was filed as to Katie Garrett’s Cross-Complaint on May 7, 2024, however, the Cross-Complaint
was not dismissed because a condition was listed in Item 1.b.(6) that cannot be imposed by the clerk. If the Cross-
Complaint is being dismissed, a new Request for Dismissal will need to be filed. If the Cross-Complaint is going
to proceed, the Nominal Wrongful Death Cross-Defendants will have to be defaulted or file responsive pleadings.
There is not valid service on Trevor Garrett. Katie Garrett is ORDERED to either dismiss or get her Cross-
Complaint at issue within 30 days today. Other than the issues above, the matter is at issue and the Court intends
to set the matter for trial before April 30, 2025. The Court notes that the matter was filed over three years ago
and finds it to be exempt from plan designation. Plaintiff and Defendant/Cross-Complainant Katie Garrett have
posted jury fees. The balance of the parties have not. The parties are granted ten days leave to post jury fees.
Failure to post jury fees within that time of today will be deemed a waiver of the right to a jury. The parties are
ordered to meet and confer prior to the hearing regarding proposed dates for trial. An appearance by all parties
is necessary on today’s calendar.
Ruling
RACHEL MERI DENOBLE VS. W HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC. ET AL
Jul 26, 2024 |
CGC24613280
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Friday, July 26, 2024, Line 16. DEFENDANT BATH AUTHORITY LLC DBA DREAMLINE's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Defendant Bath Authority LLC dba Dreamline's unopposed Motion to Strike Punitive Damages from the Complaint is granted. Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person should report to Dept. 301. However, anyone intending to appear remotely should use the regular Zoom information for Dept. 302's Law & Motion Calendar for 9:30 a.m. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the defendant is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RCE)
Preview
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE 18TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLECOUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2024SC005095 SPINE SPECIALISTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA D/B/A SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALISTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA (a/a/o Eric Jacquin) L Plaintiff, IA GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY I C Defendant. ____________________________________/ FF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT The Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. NO 1.370, hereby requests that Defendant GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, admit in writing the truth of the matters set forth below on the forty fifth 45th) day after 1. U service of this Request with the Complaint/Petition: Defendant maintains agents in SEMINOLE County, Florida to transact its customary business in SEMINOLE County, Florida. 2. Eric Jacquin was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 04/27/2021. 3. Defendant issued an automobile insurance policy which provides Personal Injury Protection benefits for Eric Jacquin for the accident referenced in Plaintiff’s complaint. 4. The policy describe din Plaintiff’s Request for Admission #3 was in full force and effect for the subject accident. 5. Defendant received timely notice of a covered loss for the claim at issue in this case and the notice was proper under the subject policy. 6. Defendant does not possess any documentation which waives Plaintiff’s right to pursue the instant lawsuit. 7. Defendant has no meritorious defenses the Plaintiff’s lawsuit. 8. Defendant owes the Plaintiff more than $5. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE L I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was attached IA to the copy of the Summons and Complaint to be served by process on the Defendant. F I C STEINGER, GREENE& FEINER F /s/ Thomas J. Wenzel THOMAS J. WENZEL, ESQUIRE Fla. Bar No.: 104117 O 133 NW 100th Avenue Plantation, FL 33324 N Telephone: 954 491 7701 Fax Number: 954 634 8312 U Service: pleadings@injurylawyers.com Attorney for Plaintiff