On July 01, 2024 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wentao Huang, Individually And Derivatively On Behalf Of Baba & The Legacy Kitchen, Inc.,
and
Baba & The Legacy Kitchen Inc.,
Bolton Baba Llc,
Boston Holdings Llc,
Cheng, Tai,
Wilson Wang, Weidong,
Xie, Laurel,
for Contract / Business Cases
in the District Court of Worcester County.
Preview
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Worcester, s. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
Wentao Huang, individually and
derivatively on behalf of Baba & the Civil Action No. 24 ®Q(N1 BU-Pe
Legacy Kitchen Inc.
Plaintiff,
Vv.
FILED
Weidong Wilson Wang, Tai Cheng,
Laurel Xie, Baba & the Legacy Kitchen
JUL 01 2024 Aes
Inc., Bolton Baba LLC, Boston Holdings
LLC D0 Arcrer
MW
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF
Pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 65(a) and (b), The Plaintiff Wentao Huang (“Mr. Huang”)
seek a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and, after a hearing, a preliminary injunction
against the Defendants requesting the court to:
(1) order the Defendants to desist and refrain from selling the restaurant, Baba and The
Legacy Kitchen (“restaurant”) or any share of any entity that exercises control over the
restaurant in any way; and
(2) compel the individual defendants, Weidong Wilson Wang (“Wilson”), Tai Cheng and
Laurel Xie (“Laurel”) to disclose to Mr. Huang all relevant information and documents
about the proposed sale, including but not limited to identity of the potential buyer,
purchase price and payment terms.
Plaintiff relies on the Verified Complaint, the Affidavit of Wentao Huang, and the
Memorandum in Support of TRO and Preliminary Relief in this action.
Plaintiff further state as follows:
Mr. Huang owns stock and membership interest in the corporate defendants, two closely-
held companies, which operate a restaurant. Mr. Huang has been frozen out by the controlling
shareholder and officers. He suffers as a minority shareholder by receiving no return for his
investment in the entire relevant time. Significantly, the defendants currently are trying to sell the
restaurant to an unknown third party by the individual defendants. The transaction is said to be
closed any time now. Mr. Huang has sent a demand through his counsel to put defendants on
notice that he objects to the sale of the restaurant. Defendants ignored the objection, and hence
the current motion for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction is made by Mr. Huang.
The wrongful acts of the defendants include, without limitation, the freezing out of Mr.
Huang, the fraudulent attempted sale of the corporation's substantial assets, and their breach of
fiduciary duty as controlling stockholders, officers, and directors of the defendant corporations.
Mr. Huang also bring a derivative claim on behalf of Baba & the Legacy Kitchen Inc. against the
individual defendants for the damages they caused to the corporation.
There is a reasonable likelihood that Mr. Huang will succeed on the merits of all of his
claims given the undisputed fact that Mr. Huang is a shareholder and member of the companies
in question, Mr. Huang has made substantial capital contribution in the sum of around $420,000,
and that the Defendants steadfastly refused to declare dividends, denied Mr. Huang any
participation in the management or access to the information of the business status, and
essentially froze Mr. Huang out.
Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if the restaurant is sold to an unknown buyer,
Defendants will not pay Mr. Huang back his capital contribution. Mr. Huang will completely
lose his equity interest in the restaurant. Indeed, the very existence of the business will be gone.
Not to mention that without any information of the transaction disclosed by the defendants, Mr.
Huang will be completely deprived of any recourse to retrieve his investment and the dividend
he is entitled to. It is a serious harm that the Plaintiff seeks the honorable court’s help to prevent.
Moreover, once the restaurant is sold, Mr. Huang will no longer be a shareholder, losing his
standing to sue the Derivative Defendants on behalf of Baba Corp derivatively. Therefore, from
many perspectives, the court should allow this injunctive relief.
The balance of harms clearly weighs in Mr. Huang’s favor, because to stop the
Defendants from selling the restaurant does not impose a great risk on them. The restaurant can
always be sold judging by how quickly the defendants were able to secure a buyer to potentially
close the transaction soon. However, the Plaintiff will suffer larger harm because if the restaurant
is sold, all the evidence, financial information and accounting records, will be lost. Gone together
is the Plaintiffs standing to sue derivatively. Therefore, the harm to Plaintiff would outweigh the
burden to the Defendants to comply with the injunction.
For these reasons, Plaintiffs request that the Court rule in favor of Mr. Huang and grant
this motion.
Date: July 1, 2024 Wentao Huang, Plaintiff
By his attorneys,
/s/ Connie Dai
Connie C. Dai (BBO#683330)
Yun Cheng (BBO#707028)
Shuyao Wang (Pro Hac Vice pending, New
York Bar Registration Number 5906227)
Lion’s Law, P.C.
154 Wells Ave
Newton
Massachusetts 02459
(617) 682-7111 Telephone