arrow left
arrow right
  • The Isaac Hersko Revocable Trust With  Morris Hersko As Trustee, Denissi Hersko, We All Care, Inc. A/K/A We Care v. Abraham Weisel Torts - Other Professional Malpractice (Attorney Malpractice) document preview
  • The Isaac Hersko Revocable Trust With  Morris Hersko As Trustee, Denissi Hersko, We All Care, Inc. A/K/A We Care v. Abraham Weisel Torts - Other Professional Malpractice (Attorney Malpractice) document preview
  • The Isaac Hersko Revocable Trust With  Morris Hersko As Trustee, Denissi Hersko, We All Care, Inc. A/K/A We Care v. Abraham Weisel Torts - Other Professional Malpractice (Attorney Malpractice) document preview
  • The Isaac Hersko Revocable Trust With  Morris Hersko As Trustee, Denissi Hersko, We All Care, Inc. A/K/A We Care v. Abraham Weisel Torts - Other Professional Malpractice (Attorney Malpractice) document preview
						
                                

Preview

At IAS Term, Part _____, of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Supreme Courthouse, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York, on the _____ day of June, 2024. P R E S E N T: Hon. Justice. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X THE ISAAC HERSKO REVOCABLE TRUST WITH Index No. 510953/2022 MORRIS HERSKO AS TRUSTEE, DENISSI HERSKO, And WE ALL CARE INC. a/k/a WE CARE, ORDER TO SHOW Plaintiffs, CAUSE WITH TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER -against- ABRAHAM WEISEL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------X Upon reading and filing the affirmation of Daniel Feldman, Esq., dated June 5, 2024, the Notice Pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 202.7, dated June 5, 2024, and the exhibits annexed thereto, and upon all of the pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein, Let plaintiffs, The Isaac Hersko Revocable Trust with Morris Hersko as Trustee, and We All Care Inc., a/k/a We Care, show cause before this Court, at Part 29, Room 724, before the Hon. Wayne P. Saitta, at the courthouse located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York, on the ___ day of _____________, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an order should not be made and entered as follows: A. Pursuant to CPLR 2221(d) and (e), granting defendant, Abraham Weisel (“Defendant”), leave to renew and reargue defendant’s prior motion to quash and for a protective order (motion sequence #7) (the “Prior Motion”); B. Upon such reargument and/or renewal, modifying the Decision and Order dated May 16, 2024, and entered on May 16, 2024 (the “Order”) to the extent of denying Defendant’s Prior Motion; and C. Granting Defendant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper, including costs and disbursements; and it is ORDERED, that pending the hearing and determination of this motion, all acts, actions, discovery, and proceedings by or on behalf of plaintiffs and their attorneys or other representatives or agents to enforce the eighteen (18) non-party subpoenas that were the subject of the Prior Motion and Order, be and hereby are STAYED; and it is further ORDERED, that plaintiffs’ answering papers shall be electronically filed on or before June __, 2024, and Defendants’ reply papers shall be electronically filed at least one day before the return date of this motion; and it is further ORDERED, that service of a copy of this Order, together with all the papers upon which it is granted, upon the attorneys for Plaintiffs, Melanie I. Wiener, Esq., at 1 MetroTech Center, Suite 1701, Brooklyn, NY 11201, by electronic filing via NYSCEF, on or before the _____ day of June __, 2024 be deemed good and sufficient service. E N T E R: ____________________________ J. S. C. 2