arrow left
arrow right
  • GREGORY SCOGGINGS VS GEORGE HUNT General Civil Action document preview
  • GREGORY SCOGGINGS VS GEORGE HUNT General Civil Action document preview
  • GREGORY SCOGGINGS VS GEORGE HUNT General Civil Action document preview
  • GREGORY SCOGGINGS VS GEORGE HUNT General Civil Action document preview
						
                                

Preview

NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE FRANKLIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. 23-CVS-1169 GREGORY SCOGGINS ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) GEORGE HUNT ) Defendant, ) ) Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, moves the Court that summary judgment on his Complaint for Alienation of Affection, Criminal Conversation, and Punitive Damages be entered in his favor. The reason for this Motion is that based on the verified pleadings, discovery, and affidavits, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This the 22nd day of May 2024. TICKLE LAW OFFICE, PLLC By: /s/ Lawrence Edward Tickle, Jr. Lawrence Edward Tickle, Jr. Bar # 46451 Attorney for Defendant 105 S. Main Street Louisburg, NC 27549 Office (919) 496-1201 Fax (919) 800-3002 Lawrence@ticklelawoffice.com Electronically Filed Date: 5/22/2024 9:38 AM Franklin Superior Court County Clerk of Superior Court CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Motion for Summary Judgment was served on the Defendant below by Email, addressed to: JEFFREY SCOTT THOMPSON ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT JSTLAWOFFICE@GMAIL.COM This the 22nd day of May 2024. TICKLE LAW OFFICE, PLLC By:/s/ Lawrence Edward Tickle, Jr. Lawrence Edward Tickle, Jr. Bar # 46451 Attorney for Plaintiff 105 S. Main Street Louisburg, NC 27549 Office (919) 496-1201 Fax (919) 800-3002 Lawrence@ticklelawoffice.com