arrow left
arrow right
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • ALMA E. MARTINEZ VS. CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC, JONATHAN I. ESPINOSA REYESInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Submitted 1/29/2024 8:45 AM Hidalgo County Clerk Accepted by: Alejandra Lara C-2302-24-E 17195 CAUSE NO. CL-23-4789-B ALMA E. MARTINEZ § IN THE COUNTY COURT Plaintiff, § § v. § ATLAWNO.2 § JONATHAN I. ESPINOZA REYES, § AND CTR LOGISTICS TX, LLC § Defendants. § HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTS'ORIGINAL ANSWER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COME NOW CTR LOGISTICS TX, LLC and JONATHAN I. ESPINOZA REYES, Defendants named in the above entitled and numbered cause, and file this their Original Answer, and for same would respectfully show unto the Court as follows: I. GENERAL DENIAL Defendants deny each and every, all and singular, the material allegations contained within Plaintiffs pleadings and demands strict proof thereof. u. OBJECTION TO RULE 193.7 NOTICE Defendants object to these attempts to authenticate "all documents produced" by given a general notice, rather than notice of what particular documents they intend to use, on the grounds that it is not sufficient actual notice as required by Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Without knowledge of what specific documents these parties intend to use at the trial, Defendants are handicapped in their defense and their ability to legally object. DEFENDANTS' ORIGINAL ANSWER Page 1 Electronically Submitted 1/29/2024 8:45 AM Hidalgo County Clerk Accepted by: Alejandra Lara III. JURY DEMAND In accordance with Rule 216 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants demand a trial by jury. Simultaneously with the filing of this demand, a jury fee is being paid on behalf of Defendants. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants CTR LOGISTICS TX, LLC and JONATHAN I. ESPINOZA REYES pray that the Plaintiff takes nothing by this suit, that Defendants go hence with their costs without delay, and for such other and further relief, both general and special, at law and in equity, to which Defendants may show himself justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, State Bar No. 5301 Southwest Parkway, Suite 460 Austin, Texas 78735 512-4 79-8400 512-479-8402 [Fax] bsanders@.feesmith.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT CTR LOGISTICS TX, LLC AND JONATHAN I. ESPINOZA REYES DEFENDANTS' ORIGINAL ANSWER Page2 Electronically Electronically Filed Submitted 1/29/2024 8:45 AM Hidalgo County Clerk Accepted by: Alejandra Lara CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THIS WILL CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been served on all attorneys of record in this cause of action on the 29th day of January 2024. Via E-File Manuel Guerra, III Guerra Law Firm 320 Pecan Blvd McAllen, Texas 78501 Manuel@guerralwfirm.net ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS' ORIGINAL ANSWER Page3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Rocio Lozano on behalf of Bret Sanders Bar No. 24033152 rlozano@feesmith.com Envelope ID: 83875219 Filing Code Description: Answer/Response Filing Description: 2024-01-29 Defendants' Original Answer Status as of 1/29/2024 9:35 AM CST Associated Case Party: ALMAE.MARTINEZ Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status MANUEL GUERRA III manuel@guerralawfirm.net 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Andrew Coward andrew@guerralawfirm.net 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Cindy Leal cindy@glf-pc.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Associated Case Party: CRT LOGISTICS TX, LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Bret A.Sanders bsanders@feesmith.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Rocio Lozano rlozano@feesmith.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Eva Castaneda ecastaneda@feesmith.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT John Plumlee jplumlee@feesmith.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT Diana Price dprice@feesmith.com 1/29/2024 8:45:37 AM SENT