arrow left
arrow right
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
  • PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA vs. ANTHONY RIOS, et al.Auto Unlimited (22) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ANS to COM P by A driana Sanchez and Anthon y Javier Rios 1 Deborah T. Bjonerud, State Bar No. 141960 JEANETTE N. LITTLE & ASSOCIATES 2 Employees of the Law Department State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 3 4450 Rosewood Drive, Suite 450 Pleasanton, California 94588 4 Telephone: (925) 225-6838 / Fax: (855) 732-9437 Service Email: deborah.bjonerud@statefarm.com 5 Attorneys for defendant(s) Adriana Sanchez and 6 Anthony Javier Rios 7 8 CIVIL COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY 10 11 PATRICIA ZARAGOZA ORTA, AN Case No.: 24CV000320 INDIVIDUAL; 12 "ADDITIONAL PARTIES ATTACHMENT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON FORM IS ATTACHED", BEHALF OF DEFENDANT(S) 13 ADRIANA SANCHEZ AND ANTHONY Plaintiff(s), JAVIER RIOS; DEMAND FOR JURY 14 TRIAL vs. 15 Complaint Filed: February 21, 2024 ANTHONY JAVIER RIOS, AN Judge: Hon. Thomas W. Wills 16 INDIVIDUAL; Dept.: 13A ADRIANA SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; Trial Date: None Assigned 17 AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, 18 Defendant(s). 19 20 Adriana Sanchez and Anthony Javier Rios answer(s) the unverified original complaint of 21 Jesus Adan Tapia Zaragoza, Maria Tapia Zaragoza, and Patricia Zaragoza Orta on file herein as 22 follows: 23 By virtue of Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, these answering defendant(s) 24 deny(ies) every allegation contained in the original complaint insofar as said allegations refer to 25 these answering defendant(s) and further deny(ies) that plaintiff(s) has/have been damaged in the 26 sum or sums alleged, or in any other sum or sums, or at all. 27 28 FIRST SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE -1- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 TO THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT 2 (COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE) 3 If plaintiff(s) suffered or sustained any loss, damage or injury as alleged in the complaint, 4 such loss, damage or injury was proximately caused and contributed to by plaintiff(s) failing to 5 conduct themselves in a manner expected of a reasonably prudent person in the conduct of their 6 affairs and person. Plaintiff(s)’ recovery herein is barred, diminished or reduced to the extent 7 that plaintiff(s)’ loss, damage or injury is attributed to plaintiff(s)’ negligence. 8 9 SECOND SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 10 TO THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT 11 (FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION) 12 Plaintiff(s) has/have failed to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against 13 answering defendant(s). 14 15 THIRD SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 16 TO THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT 17 (APPORTIONMENT) 18 If plaintiff(s) suffered or sustained any damages as alleged in the complaint, those 19 damages were proximately caused and contributed to by persons other than answering 20 defendant(s), including but not limited to Doe defendant(s). The liability of all defendants, 21 named or unnamed, should be apportioned according to their relative degrees of fault, and the 22 liability, if any, of answering defendant(s) should be reduced accordingly. 23 24 FOURTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 25 TO THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT 26 (FAILURE TO MITIGATE DAMAGES) 27 Plaintiff(s)’ recovery is reduced or diminished by plaintiff(s)’ failure to mitigate their 28 damages. -2- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 2 WHEREFORE, this/these answering defendant(s) pray(s): 3 1. That the plaintiff(s) take nothing by their complaint; 4 2. For costs of the suit incurred herein; and 5 3. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 6 7 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 8 Defendant(s) hereby demand(s) a trial by jury in the above-referenced matter. 9 DATED: May 3, 2024 JEANETTE N. LITTLE & 10 ASSOCIATES 11 By: Akhila Ganapathy for Deborah T. 12 Bjonerud Attorneys for defendant(s) Adriana 13 Sanchez and Anthony Javier Rios 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 PROOF OF SERVICE Orta, et al. v. Rios, et al. | Monterey County Civil Court - Case No. 24CV000320 2 3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My electronic service address is clc.pleasanton.eservice@statefarm.com and my business address 4 is 4450 Rosewood Drive, Suite 450, Pleasanton, California 94588. On May 3, 2024, I served the following document(s) on the following person(s): 5 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT(S) ADRIANA SANCHEZ AND 6 ANTHONY JAVIER RIOS; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 7 Gonzalo Villalobos 8 Makkabi Law Group, APC 9454 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 900 9 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 L2@makkabilaw.com 10 Attorney(s) for Plaintiff Jesus Adan Tapia 11 Zaragoza, Plaintiff Maria Tapia Zaragoza, Plaintiff Patricia Zaragoza Orta 12 13 ☒ [Electronic Submission] – Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 14 §1010.6(e)(1), I served a true copy of the aforementioned document(s) via electronic mail on the parties in said action by transmitting by email to the email address(es) as set forth above on this 15 date. No electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful was received within a reasonable time after submission. I declare under penalty of perjury under the 16 laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on May 3, 2024. 17 18 By: 19 Selene Inguanzo 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL