Motion-Secondary: MOORE SWEEPING, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS GUY F. ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION, LLC, A MARYLAND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1 DAN ROWAN CORTRIGHT, SBN 206856
   THE ROWAN FIRM
 2 PO Box 2061
   Sebastopol, California 95473
 3 707-360-1009
   dan@therowanfirm.com
 4
   Attorney for Plaintiff
 5 MOORE SWEEPING
 6
 7
 8
                       SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
 9
                                     COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11
     MOORE SWEEPING, a California corporation, )          Case No.: 22 PSCV01040
12                                              )
                 Plaintiff,                     )         Unlimited Jurisdiction
13                                              )
          vs.                                   )
                                                )         OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE IN
14                                                        OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
     GUY F. ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION, LLC, )
                                                )         MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
15                                                        OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
                 Defendant.                     )
                                                )         ADJUDICATION
16
                                                )
17                                            )

18          Plaintiff Moore Sweeping hereby objects to defendant Guy F. Atkinson Construction, LLC’s
19 evidence in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary
20 Adjudication. Plaintiff requests that the objectionable evidence be stricken from the record and that
21 such inadmissible evidence not be considered by the Court.
22      MATTER/OBJECTION                         GROUNDS                           RULING
23    Grievance, Exhibit Y to Ryan Lacks foundation                     Sustained: _______
      Crosner Declaration.         as statements attributed to
24                                 him are not authenticated by         Overruled: _______
25                                 Mr. Martinez; hearsay (Evid.
                                   Code
26                                 §§ 403(a)(3), 405, 1200(b).)

27

28
                                                     1
         OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
        SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
 1                                   Respectfully submitted,

 2                                   THE ROWAN FIRM

 3
     DATED: April 24, 2024     By: _______________________________
 4                               Dan Rowan Cortright, Esq.
                                 Attorney for plaintiff Moore Sweeping
 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28
                                         2
         OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
        SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY JUDGMENT