Preview
1 JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ. (SBN: 295967)
Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli
Complex Litigation Bureau
3 4751 Whittier Blvd.
Los Angeles, California. 90022
4 Phone:310-801-1919
Fax: 323-647-2387
E-service Email: complex@iacobfights.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
10
11 NILKA COOKS, et al., Case No.: BCV-23- 100G72.
12
Plaintiff,
13 NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND
vs. OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
14
FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY;
15 KRYSTAL WALLER, etc., et al., DECLARATION OF JACOB O.
PARTIYELI
16 Defendants.
DATE: April 29, 2024
17
TIME: 8:30 A.M.
18 DEPT: T2
ACTION COMMENCED: March 17, 2023
19
20
21
I.
22 FACTUAL STATEMENT:
The Defendants have purported to have filed some motions to further compel discovery
responses. First, they issued the motions via a link that was NOT accessible. Then, they sent
an email confirming that the documents were too large to send via email and were subsequently
not delivered. Then, they mailed such documents via a flash drive that had NO content within.
Finally, they sent the documents but did NOT include the moving papers, ONLY the
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 1
1 declarations. Despite begging pleas for due process rights in order to properly oppose such
2
motions, the Defendants slapped us in the face and ignored such basic principles, in grave
3
violation of law.
4
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES:
5
6 II.
THE MOTION SHOULD BE DENIED AS A VIOLATION
7 OF DUE PROCESS:
8
People in the Marines, Army, Air Force, Space Force, Navy, and Coast Guard, go :
9
overseas to fight for the freedoms most take for granted in this country. One of the most vital
10
freedoms and rights in this country is that of due process. Notice and an opportunity to be heard
11
12 is the most fundamental right that a citizen has in America, full stop! The Defendants herein
13 only served a “declaration” and NOT the moving papers to anyone, so one may ask, how can
14
the undersigned oppose the motion? They cannot!
15
A landmark Court of Appeals decision recently held, “Was the notice of motion alone
16
sufficient? On this question, the trial court responded with an emphatic “no,” citing the
17
18 requirements of section 1010. We agree. Section 1010 states in pertinent part as follows:
19 ‘Notices must be in writing, and the notice of a motion, other than for a new trial, must state
20
when, and the grounds upon which it will be made, and the papers, if any, upon which it is to be
21
based. If any such paper has not previously been served upon the party to be notified and
22
was not filed by him, a copy of such paper must accompany the notice.’” (Emphasis
23
24 Added). See Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127, 137-
25 138. The Court goes on to say: “Section 101 O’s requirement “is for the benefit of the party
26
upon whom the notice is served,” to make him or her aware of the issues to be raised in the
27
motion. (Hecq v. Conner (1928) 203 Cal. 504, 506 [265 P. 180]; see also Kinda v. Carpenter
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 2
1 (2016) 247 CalApp. 4th 1268, 1277 [203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 183] (Kinda). As stated in Kinda: “The
2
purpose of the notice requirements ‘is to cause the moving party to “sufficiently define the
3
issues for the information and attention of the adverse party and the court.’” (Luri v. Greenwald
4
(2003) 107 Cal.App. 4th 1119, 1125 [132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680] quoting Hernandez v. National
5
6 Dairy Products (1954) 126 Cal.App. 2d 490, 493 [272 P. 2d 799].” See Golf& Tennis Pro
7 Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127, 137-138.
8
Here, the Defendants provided the mere “declaration” but NOT the moving papers, and
9
as Courts have universally ruled, this is not sufficient. Failure to identify the papers upon which
10
the notice of motion was based is not sufficient. “We note in Wesinstein v. Blumberg (2018) 25
11
12 —
Cal.App. 5th 316 [235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 658] a case on which the trial court and real parties in
13 —
interest relied a notice of motion unaccompanied by supporting papers was deemed
14
insufficient even though it had specified the papers upon which it would be based. (Id. at p.
15
318).” See also, Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127,
16
139, footnote 10.
17
18 III.
CONCLUSION:
19 Not many people get second chances in life, and here, the Defendants not only failed to
20
meet the requirements of the basic California Code of Civil Procedure, but also FAILED to
21
comply with the fundamental requirements of the due process rights!
22
What has happened here is a tragedy, the tragedy that the big insurance company is
23
24 using to try to sideline the fight of equality and justice. The reality is that the Defendants did
25 NOT comply with the requirements of the California Code of Civil Procedure nor the
26
Constitution’s due process mandates, by requiring that service of the moving papers to be
27
served on the opposing parties. Given the evidence forthwith, and the arguments within this
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 3
1 notice of objection, this motion must be denied. Thank you for your consideration, and thank
2
you for allowing the Plaintiffs the opportunity to fight for justice and for equality under the law.
3
///
4
III
5
6 DATED: April 16, 2024
7 LAW OFFICE OF JACOB O. PARTIYELI
8
/s/ Jo£c|j 0.
9
10 BY:
JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ.
11 Attorney for Plaintiff
12
13 Electronic Signature pursuant to Civil Code § 1633.7(d)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 4
1 DECLARATION OF JACOB O, PARTIYELI:
2
I, JACOB O. PARTIYELI, declare:
3
1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California, and am the
4
attorney of record for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action.
5
6 2. The matters contained in this declaration are known to me personally, and if
7 called upon to testify as to such matters under oath in a Court of law, I could and would do so
8
competently.
9
3. I have NOT obtained the moving papers for this motion, so I do not know the
10
legal arguments within. The Defendants tried to send the documents via a link that was not
11
12 accessible to my office. Then, they sent a mailed flash drive with NO content within. Finally,
13 they provided some documents, but we obtained ONLY the moving declarations (in various
14
lengthy volumes) but NOT the moving papers, nor the notice of motion for such pending
15
matters. The Defendants’ attorney even provided a response that provided:
16
“Our office has attempted several times to send you the documents via email but were unable
17
18 to. See attached notification.
19 As such, we will send your office a copy of the motion via flash drive.
20
Please let me know if you have any questions and/or comments.
21
Elvin Vu | Associate Attorney | Tressler LLP
22
evu@tresslerllp.com
23
24 O: (949)-336-3920
25 C: (415)-939-5631
26
F: (949)-752-0645
27
2 Park Plaza, Suite 1050, Irvine, CA 92614
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 5
1 www.tresslerllp.com”
2
A true copy of such email attachment is enclosed for identification as Plaintiffs
3
Exhibit 1.0.
4
4. On April 9, 2024, 1 sent an email to the Defendants’ attorney which provided:
6 “Hello:
7 Again, I cannot open the link provided within. Will you be mailing me the documents?
8 •
Otherwise, how can I oppose? This is a serious violation of due process. Thank you!
9
Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq.
10
Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli
11
12 Complex Litigation Bureau
13 4751 Whittier Blvd.
14
Los Angeles, California. 90022
15
Phone: (310) 801-1919
16
E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com”
I?
18 5. On April 5, 2024, 1 also emailed the Defendants’ attorney and said: “What is
19 this? I cannot open the link. Please overnight mail the documents, or alternatively, send as
20
PDFs, thank you!
21
Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq.
22
Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli
23
24 Complex Litigation Bureau
25 4751 Whittier Blvd.
26
Los Angeles, California. 90022
27
Phone: (310) 801-1919
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 6
1 E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com”
2
6. Then, I emailed them again: “Hello:
3
Again, I cannot open the documents and I did not get any proper link, so I hope these motions
4
get overnighted to me, otherwise, how am I supposed to oppose them? I am so concerned.
5
6 Thank you!
7 Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq.
8
Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli
9
Complex Litigation Bureau
10
4751 Whittier Blvd.
11
12 Los Angeles, California. 90022
13 Phone: (310) 801-1919
14
E-service Email: complex@iacobfights.com”
15
7. Finally, on April 12, 2024, 1 emailed the Defendants’ attorneys and said: “Thank
16
you. Can you please send me the moving papers, including the notice of motion and the
17
18 memorandum of points and authorities? Someone dropped off a bunch of declarations, via
19 separate volumes, but I do not have the moving papers within the 2 banker boxes. Thank you!
20
Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq.
21
Law Office of Jacob 0. Partiyeli
22
Complex Litigation Bureau
23
24 4751 Whittier Blvd.
25 Los Angeles, California. 90022
26
Phone: (310) 801-1919
27
E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com”
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 7
1 8. As I write, I have NO idea what the moving papers or the notice of motion
2
provide within, as I was deprived of basic due process rights. The Defendants’ attorneys
3
ignored such emails and they failed to send such moving papers, in grave violation of law.
4
Given that such due process rights were violated, it is respectfully asked that this Court DENY
5
6 the Defendants’ motion. Thank you for your consideration.
7 ///
8
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
9
declaration was executed on April 16, 2024, at City of Los Angeles, California.
10
11
/s/ Jaccb 0. Pahfi^eft, E^.
12
13
JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
14
15 Electronic Signature pursuant to Civil Code § 1633.7(d)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 8
1
2
3
4
5 Plaintiffs Exhibit 1.0
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 9
From: postmaster@NETORGFT9224667.onmicrosoft.com
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:55 AM
To: Mildred Dardis
Subject: Undeliverable: RE: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal Waller, et al.; KCSC #BCV-23-100822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4
Emails
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Complex Litigation Bureau (complex@jacobfiqhts.com)
Your message is too large to send. To send it, make the message smaller, for example, by removing
attachments.
The maximum message size that’s allowed is 36 MB. This message is 57 MB.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: PH7PR10MB5831.namprdl0.prod.outlook.com
cornplex@jacobfights.com
Remote server returned '550 5,2.3 RESOLVER.RST.RecipSizeLimit; message too large for this recipient'
Original message headers:
1
Received: from BYAPR03CA0009.namprd03.prod .outlook.com (2603:1 Ob6:a02:a8::22)
by PH7PR10MB5831.namprdl0.prod.outlook.com (260 3:10b6:510: 132::19 ) with
Microsoft SMTP Server ( version=TLSl 2,
cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id -15.2'0.,7409.46; Fri, 5 Apr
—
C U2‘i 1 I : 4:4 r 0u V u
(mail -bnSnaml1lp2169.outbound . protection , outlook . com [ 104.47.58,169]) by
relay.mimeoast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS ( version=TLSvl .2,
cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id
।
—S 3 "“Hu ’! (ICCZGMgKXN t” Co IS 6vT A™ , F’ri z O1-^ Apt 2Q/4 1 ^'53'31 "-0^00
X-MC-Unique: hu7UCCZGMgKXNtCojS6vTA-3
Received: from DM5PR1501MB2071 , namprdl5.prod .outlook.com (2603: 10b6:4:a5::27}
by IAlPR15MB6126.namprdl5.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:447 ;:20) with
Microsoft SMTP Server ( version=TLSl 2,
cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id 15,20.7409.46; Fri, 5 Apr
2024 17:52:56 +0000
Received: from DM5PR1501MB2071.namprdl5.prod.outlook.com
( [fe80::3b69:7a0d:ae9a:7805)) by DM5PR1501MB2071.nanprdl5.prod.outlook.com
{(fe80::3b69:7a0d:ae9a:7805%3]) with mapi id 15.20.7409.042; Fri, 5 Apr 2024
17:52:56 +0000
From: Mildred Dardis
To: Complex Litigation Bureau , armando
jacobfiqhts.com
CC: Elvin Vu , Karl Schlecht ,
Jihoon Kim , Binh Nguyen ,
"Barkinskaya, E. Jennie" , "afornwalt@cgdrlaw.com"
Subject: RE: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal Waller, et al.; KCSC
#BCV-23~100822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4 Emails
Thread-Topic: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal. Waller, et al.; KCSC
#BCV-23-l00822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4 Emails
Thread-Index: AQHah4IWjcm+0BsF5UKqStDZqAJ7zQ==
Return-Receipt-To:
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:52:55 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
In-Reply-To:
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip labels:
x -ms-1raffic typediagnost ic:
2
DM5PR1501MB2071 :EE I IA1PR15MB6126 : EE | CY4PEPF0000EDD5 :EE | PH7PR1 0MB5831 : EE
-
x -ms e x ch a n ge -se nd e rad che ck : 1
z-ms -exchange-antispam-relay: 0
X-Microsof t-Antispam-Untrusted: BCL : 0
-
X Mi c r os g f t -A nt i spam-Mes s age -1nf o-Or i g i na1 :
oGKz8y5YU/3AgXiaonkaPboPXuqBHzc9sW+xaSkx9yJJdMo 1f r qT c 0 9 v 0 0 6 0 c J i 8 p t
n F a k q Y / a 3EX r / yi j S 0 / TTGu K 5 WD 8 i 9 9 3 B I PT 0 y 7 h E 5bQg c e pwqXy 5yd 9 d FqG +mxWS + FD2 D w 4 JwVJO U / /
zavlwaXi PmaNNTc+hfR3f kpYT5UxW+d2cYbM9z2gW3dPXPw C 3 L 4 F v 5 V Fa 4 g kS govpI OMQ z y YG P f i 0 e 2 J
KFJhRw5VSGU93cvtYixgWmrw5N98kYGqonXv0qS0HPR6gWi’J v U101M r 1 / B15 9E 8Wh D U 8 y q 0 m 3MX Vn QQU e
,
Iexg0bk8zol72fkGo/513R2UDw4Q7d5EFahjn6aGBlK07ki p j z G LraR FE S 3h f vs 0 u11 Vw V k g s g c B Rb R E W
+MPq8AV9RDMicHS jQwiTY+CZkb6WNB7hrpcgqs6oYFyV7 3H 1 r N c r QK.K.D1uw k.D5Qa q j m j p 6 g w y k r a + Q 4 N
zC /bco j i aFf EX 6iGnSI SKAUKL I r zhQhqWh 3 wd 9p r 3
-
X Fo r e f r on t An t is pam- R epo r t n t r u s t e d :
GIF : 2 55 . 2 5 5 . 2 55 . 2 55; CTRY : ; LANG : en; SCL : 1 ; SRV : ; IP 7 : NSPM; H : DM 5PR1501MB2 07 1 . namprdl5 .
prod. outlook. com; PTR: ;CAT : NONE; SF3 : (13230031) (1 5) (366007) ( 376005) ; DIR : OUT; SFP : 11 0
2
- - -
x -ms e x c h a n g& a n t i spam-me s s g e da, t a chunkccun t :
- - -
z ms e z c h a n g e an t ispam-me ss gedata-0: -='?utf-
8 ? B? W kR 3 Z D B w UU1yS1JXM z F2 TH V 3 FB Kb G 5 KK2 1X bW1E d H p 'iTFdKTTNU? =
= ?ut f - 8 ? B ?bW 9vSEJUNC tKTS t B a B a Wmxa dn Z ne Hp Y S G d o N21jc36 YWJB?=
-
= ? u t f 8 ? B ? b GNOME t L Umh YVH pa iW Z T c 0 FN U 3B s bS t H 0T E W1BGU01 ’"oik- ' / s-V2JV?=
c.
-
= ? u t f 3 ? B ? WN w UE h 2 a k o v U W d X ^VFLUraQrR z FNVkxGWF Itpln,T?=
/-:■ t V > /\i
?u t f -8 ? B '? e n Ji V1V I b1JY W DNh 41A r e1V wTXo y THR Ob H J biMr LIT il ' 1 in i
\ m C?=
’
-
= ? u t f 8 ? B ? VE1SQnBEb01vT Gp L’ Ai JiSEZCTkVINj TOQnl d / I u 9 DP 2^3?=
c p a x -m '
-
= ?utf 8?B?ZHpoaGNuTmJIVDVq! ImVN k I SG J 4 cX
? u t f - 8 ? B ? T 01 3 aGRpMV F6 N 2 4 3 <1 FwUWZRMnhhdEpFUG 5'
'
VN W dEZjUGI
' ' I I i.
=?utf-8 ?B?b3ZudlNjdEV5WXdr 5 Uz 4 THNWc D Z FT i1 4 OE 4 akJGSUF nn l n m ib /;Nla?=
=?utf-8?B?cHlkaONJQ3UxQkE4. 2 z g2 WmJ z U DBI e Vd U WUp dmlvaOI
'
' A/O?=
9GWXFQMUVW?=
0 AU vq? =
-?utf -8?B?cS9XbTQwahr osu uznubuvux JDjAuwnistaK'JVcnBhWisn KnwNnlDL3YzaXp6?=
=?utf-3?B?dVgxOU91MHlyMHdEdXpqbOVqSnlXcnZSbldjL3pPUERNSTZUbzhTT2x2RGlx?=
=?utf-8?B?WmtWNlBGSnlyVHQyKzg2SkUyclZIcllaYkhkaWVCbjVOcHVzSGlZRGJSMU4z?=
= ?utf-8?B?Y2g2eEhO&jdhOS8wN2 J2NVR4cVJ3imiUG8yM2xkJRlZibEw2ZCtwRUp5WlpF?=
=?utf-8?B?R3gwblVUMlNHNjAleHhnZW54NjZVVFdjMWNsUHBVeldGVlMzR2V0S2NSMlVv?=
=?utf-8?B?WUJBS313bklnSXpVbTVkTXBMczAyeGRRdkRRZDNqZHBXTWtRTkNtbUtvMzds?=
=?utf-8?B?dlhHK0VrWk8xakJwalpmdjcwQlVYREpwaElBTmZuNzZqRkkwUTdQMzc5MlVI?=
=?utf-8?B?d2EvazNlQzFSaHUrRUOOR2JCM3BTeUOOQXU5YW5vOHBTOUFZcWLSU5ubFVw?=
-?utf 8?B?MVI2cEhGUOd4MU5oWUDUEllb2JneldlMUFocDhjMTIzeEMOODlqbUlpWGx6?=
=?utf-8?B?VG13L21YM0tLQndJV3MzQzl0WkNmL01CSzRMdkhyaTFKcHQyRXp4rj0FpQi9Y?=
=?utf-8?B?K0I2cllKaUVadmRQdmRMWTJMRks2bi9GNUtWdEt0c0YwR.G15TzdpWDRiMmZF?=
=?utf-8?B?TjNROVZuVmdvVlVGMkJJUlZQeHk2SEYyYmF2WkpMaklCdlVDcTBFWUpXekVN?=
=?utf-8?B?eUxpZU9Dd0UrWHolSjRwTFk3LytpL0FNMjNiZUtLSGZWaklJcThWaHIzRUM?=
-
= ?u t f 8 ?B? ZS 9 FNOdkTlQ3b3Ml dm Fn QX U1WEN1S G Y 4 Z1N z c j Q 0 WE FBQmc1Wk dWTWQ 3b z Jq?=
=?utf-8?B?UmxyczFyNjNad2VjK3NycGttblNBcXczRFF6ckcySVFGYTNHL242Q110dlAw?=
=?utf-8?B?WmlqQlBWTGVkNWx3Yk.NhM0o4RXVlSElWVGI3MVpjbDF2NDM2eko3dGtIdlVh?=
=?utf-8?B?c3h3RWNsSjdZdVJhSWdEMEI3Y2Nvd3ZhSUZrY2JZLlFuTlVldEpGTGlvcTMv?=
=?utf-8?B?T0tLcGpWcTNzMGVmUFRGYkljNXhmL0tlRDNXUTFaaU96NjExaU90S2xvZTZ0?=
=?utf-8?B?dTZlMCtUU3czT2Z4dlpDYklBOHHRnhreGhrcHBzZGZrNWRWMmdzRitlSWRm?=
~?utf-8?B?ZFkxMFlqcOFYayt3a05KZnpJcOE3V2cOREtOOHdlcTVmSXgwMElIMGg3MGNU?=
=?utf-8?B?Qm9UQzdkMFJYdm5NZndKSXAvSUtQTOxOdERCNOhmQm5KUStyaTBvczJDbGo2?=
=?utf-8?B?VEc5L05zVzZ4TUHVOtOb2ZOaU15ROdOMkpvQXcOYOhudGdWMmpyRVZOdDdh?=
=?utf-8?B?dThhVEwOSFZlbklsQlQzaDFNMlNvdmpZcytmbDhkYkVYYWJFSEhZSVFxRVZ5?=
=?utf-8?B?OFR4YnltMUcxTW40djViVlREUEY2YjMzLytnbmNzMHozQktjN3IxcWlaOUZS?=
=?utf-8?B?NjNZeFlvQmpiYTg3UU12UHVlQ0g50XdlN25PN31CU31RbHN2RjJmYys3cGRm?»
= ? u t f - 8 ? Q ? wo 6 f rT iGFnOlYx 6PHg g Y18 nEN ?=
MIME-Version : 1.0
- -
X MS - E x cha n ge T r ansport- C r os s T e n an t Hea d e r s S t amped : I.T\1PR15 MB 612 6
-
X Mi me ca s t - S pa m-Score : 0
X-Mimecast-Originator : tresslerllp. com
Content Language : en-US
Content-Type : multipart/iaixed ;
boundary" 008 _DM5PR1501MB2071DBFC68A833EAE9A2724AB9032DM5PR1501MB2071_"
Return-Path : mdardisgtressler lip . com
3
--
X EOPAttributedMessa g e: 0
- -
X EOPTenantA11ribu t edMessage: 03e2a77e-576d 41 49 9e89-3e56df eded 41:0
X-MS-Ezchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped:
CV4PEPE0000EDD5,namprd03.prod .outlook .com
X ~MS-Pub1 icTrafficType: Emai1
X MS Of fice365~Fi1taring Correlation. Id : 3904e72f 4877 4051 47If 08dc55997bel
1
STATE OF FLORIDA
2 PROOF OF SERVICE VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL
(CCP § 1010.6, et seq., CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5)
3
4
—
(Broward County Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court)
(Fla. R. Jud. Admin. § 2.516)
5 Kern County Case Name: Nilka Cooks v, Krystal Waller, et al.
Kern County Case Number: BCV-23-100£>~l'L
6
7 I , the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am a citizen of the
United States, and the European Union, Country of Portugal, and resident of the State of
8 Florida. I am over the age of eighteen years old, and I am not a party to the above-entitled
action.
9
On April 16, 2024, I have caused service of the following:
10
NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER
11 COMPEL DISCOVERY; DECLARATION OF JACOB O, PARTIYELI:
On the following named person by causing an envelope to be addressed thereto as
12 follows, via Overnight Express mail, a copy of the foregoing documents enclosed and sealed
therein, and said envelope deposited in the United States mail at City of Fort Lauderdale,
13 State of Florida, with postage thereon fully prepaid addressed as follows:
14
Attention:
15 Karl Schiecht, Esq.
Jihoon Kim, Esq.
16 TRESSLER, LLP.
2 Park Plaza, Suite: 1050
17 Irvine, California. 92614
18
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California/ State of
19 Florida that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 16, 2024; City of Fort
Lauderdale, Broward County; State of Florida.
20
/s/ Rubeiv Estrada, Pkt*. (Pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 668,S0(7)(b))
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 10
Preview
1 JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ. (SBN: 295967) Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli Complex Litigation Bureau 3 4751 Whittier Blvd. Los Angeles, California. 90022 4 Phone:310-801-1919 Fax: 323-647-2387 E-service Email: complex@iacobfights.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN 10 11 NILKA COOKS, et al., Case No.: BCV-23- 100G72. 12 Plaintiff, 13 NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND vs. OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO 14 FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY; 15 KRYSTAL WALLER, etc., et al., DECLARATION OF JACOB O. PARTIYELI 16 Defendants. DATE: April 29, 2024 17 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 18 DEPT: T2 ACTION COMMENCED: March 17, 2023 19 20 21 I. 22 FACTUAL STATEMENT: The Defendants have purported to have filed some motions to further compel discovery responses. First, they issued the motions via a link that was NOT accessible. Then, they sent an email confirming that the documents were too large to send via email and were subsequently not delivered. Then, they mailed such documents via a flash drive that had NO content within. Finally, they sent the documents but did NOT include the moving papers, ONLY the OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 1 1 declarations. Despite begging pleas for due process rights in order to properly oppose such 2 motions, the Defendants slapped us in the face and ignored such basic principles, in grave 3 violation of law. 4 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES: 5 6 II. THE MOTION SHOULD BE DENIED AS A VIOLATION 7 OF DUE PROCESS: 8 People in the Marines, Army, Air Force, Space Force, Navy, and Coast Guard, go : 9 overseas to fight for the freedoms most take for granted in this country. One of the most vital 10 freedoms and rights in this country is that of due process. Notice and an opportunity to be heard 11 12 is the most fundamental right that a citizen has in America, full stop! The Defendants herein 13 only served a “declaration” and NOT the moving papers to anyone, so one may ask, how can 14 the undersigned oppose the motion? They cannot! 15 A landmark Court of Appeals decision recently held, “Was the notice of motion alone 16 sufficient? On this question, the trial court responded with an emphatic “no,” citing the 17 18 requirements of section 1010. We agree. Section 1010 states in pertinent part as follows: 19 ‘Notices must be in writing, and the notice of a motion, other than for a new trial, must state 20 when, and the grounds upon which it will be made, and the papers, if any, upon which it is to be 21 based. If any such paper has not previously been served upon the party to be notified and 22 was not filed by him, a copy of such paper must accompany the notice.’” (Emphasis 23 24 Added). See Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127, 137- 25 138. The Court goes on to say: “Section 101 O’s requirement “is for the benefit of the party 26 upon whom the notice is served,” to make him or her aware of the issues to be raised in the 27 motion. (Hecq v. Conner (1928) 203 Cal. 504, 506 [265 P. 180]; see also Kinda v. Carpenter 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 2 1 (2016) 247 CalApp. 4th 1268, 1277 [203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 183] (Kinda). As stated in Kinda: “The 2 purpose of the notice requirements ‘is to cause the moving party to “sufficiently define the 3 issues for the information and attention of the adverse party and the court.’” (Luri v. Greenwald 4 (2003) 107 Cal.App. 4th 1119, 1125 [132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680] quoting Hernandez v. National 5 6 Dairy Products (1954) 126 Cal.App. 2d 490, 493 [272 P. 2d 799].” See Golf& Tennis Pro 7 Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127, 137-138. 8 Here, the Defendants provided the mere “declaration” but NOT the moving papers, and 9 as Courts have universally ruled, this is not sufficient. Failure to identify the papers upon which 10 the notice of motion was based is not sufficient. “We note in Wesinstein v. Blumberg (2018) 25 11 12 — Cal.App. 5th 316 [235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 658] a case on which the trial court and real parties in 13 — interest relied a notice of motion unaccompanied by supporting papers was deemed 14 insufficient even though it had specified the papers upon which it would be based. (Id. at p. 15 318).” See also, Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App. 5th 127, 16 139, footnote 10. 17 18 III. CONCLUSION: 19 Not many people get second chances in life, and here, the Defendants not only failed to 20 meet the requirements of the basic California Code of Civil Procedure, but also FAILED to 21 comply with the fundamental requirements of the due process rights! 22 What has happened here is a tragedy, the tragedy that the big insurance company is 23 24 using to try to sideline the fight of equality and justice. The reality is that the Defendants did 25 NOT comply with the requirements of the California Code of Civil Procedure nor the 26 Constitution’s due process mandates, by requiring that service of the moving papers to be 27 served on the opposing parties. Given the evidence forthwith, and the arguments within this 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 3 1 notice of objection, this motion must be denied. Thank you for your consideration, and thank 2 you for allowing the Plaintiffs the opportunity to fight for justice and for equality under the law. 3 /// 4 III 5 6 DATED: April 16, 2024 7 LAW OFFICE OF JACOB O. PARTIYELI 8 /s/ Jo£c|j 0. 9 10 BY: JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ. 11 Attorney for Plaintiff 12 13 Electronic Signature pursuant to Civil Code § 1633.7(d) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 4 1 DECLARATION OF JACOB O, PARTIYELI: 2 I, JACOB O. PARTIYELI, declare: 3 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California, and am the 4 attorney of record for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action. 5 6 2. The matters contained in this declaration are known to me personally, and if 7 called upon to testify as to such matters under oath in a Court of law, I could and would do so 8 competently. 9 3. I have NOT obtained the moving papers for this motion, so I do not know the 10 legal arguments within. The Defendants tried to send the documents via a link that was not 11 12 accessible to my office. Then, they sent a mailed flash drive with NO content within. Finally, 13 they provided some documents, but we obtained ONLY the moving declarations (in various 14 lengthy volumes) but NOT the moving papers, nor the notice of motion for such pending 15 matters. The Defendants’ attorney even provided a response that provided: 16 “Our office has attempted several times to send you the documents via email but were unable 17 18 to. See attached notification. 19 As such, we will send your office a copy of the motion via flash drive. 20 Please let me know if you have any questions and/or comments. 21 Elvin Vu | Associate Attorney | Tressler LLP 22 evu@tresslerllp.com 23 24 O: (949)-336-3920 25 C: (415)-939-5631 26 F: (949)-752-0645 27 2 Park Plaza, Suite 1050, Irvine, CA 92614 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 5 1 www.tresslerllp.com” 2 A true copy of such email attachment is enclosed for identification as Plaintiffs 3 Exhibit 1.0. 4 4. On April 9, 2024, 1 sent an email to the Defendants’ attorney which provided: 6 “Hello: 7 Again, I cannot open the link provided within. Will you be mailing me the documents? 8 • Otherwise, how can I oppose? This is a serious violation of due process. Thank you! 9 Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq. 10 Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli 11 12 Complex Litigation Bureau 13 4751 Whittier Blvd. 14 Los Angeles, California. 90022 15 Phone: (310) 801-1919 16 E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com” I? 18 5. On April 5, 2024, 1 also emailed the Defendants’ attorney and said: “What is 19 this? I cannot open the link. Please overnight mail the documents, or alternatively, send as 20 PDFs, thank you! 21 Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq. 22 Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli 23 24 Complex Litigation Bureau 25 4751 Whittier Blvd. 26 Los Angeles, California. 90022 27 Phone: (310) 801-1919 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 6 1 E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com” 2 6. Then, I emailed them again: “Hello: 3 Again, I cannot open the documents and I did not get any proper link, so I hope these motions 4 get overnighted to me, otherwise, how am I supposed to oppose them? I am so concerned. 5 6 Thank you! 7 Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq. 8 Law Office of Jacob O. Partiyeli 9 Complex Litigation Bureau 10 4751 Whittier Blvd. 11 12 Los Angeles, California. 90022 13 Phone: (310) 801-1919 14 E-service Email: complex@iacobfights.com” 15 7. Finally, on April 12, 2024, 1 emailed the Defendants’ attorneys and said: “Thank 16 you. Can you please send me the moving papers, including the notice of motion and the 17 18 memorandum of points and authorities? Someone dropped off a bunch of declarations, via 19 separate volumes, but I do not have the moving papers within the 2 banker boxes. Thank you! 20 Jacob O. Partiyeli, Esq. 21 Law Office of Jacob 0. Partiyeli 22 Complex Litigation Bureau 23 24 4751 Whittier Blvd. 25 Los Angeles, California. 90022 26 Phone: (310) 801-1919 27 E-service Email: complex@jacobfights.com” 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 7 1 8. As I write, I have NO idea what the moving papers or the notice of motion 2 provide within, as I was deprived of basic due process rights. The Defendants’ attorneys 3 ignored such emails and they failed to send such moving papers, in grave violation of law. 4 Given that such due process rights were violated, it is respectfully asked that this Court DENY 5 6 the Defendants’ motion. Thank you for your consideration. 7 /// 8 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this 9 declaration was executed on April 16, 2024, at City of Los Angeles, California. 10 11 /s/ Jaccb 0. Pahfi^eft, E^. 12 13 JACOB O. PARTIYELI, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff 14 15 Electronic Signature pursuant to Civil Code § 1633.7(d) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 8 1 2 3 4 5 Plaintiffs Exhibit 1.0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 9 From: postmaster@NETORGFT9224667.onmicrosoft.com Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:55 AM To: Mildred Dardis Subject: Undeliverable: RE: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal Waller, et al.; KCSC #BCV-23-100822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4 Emails Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: Complex Litigation Bureau (complex@jacobfiqhts.com) Your message is too large to send. To send it, make the message smaller, for example, by removing attachments. The maximum message size that’s allowed is 36 MB. This message is 57 MB. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: PH7PR10MB5831.namprdl0.prod.outlook.com cornplex@jacobfights.com Remote server returned '550 5,2.3 RESOLVER.RST.RecipSizeLimit; message too large for this recipient' Original message headers: 1 Received: from BYAPR03CA0009.namprd03.prod .outlook.com (2603:1 Ob6:a02:a8::22) by PH7PR10MB5831.namprdl0.prod.outlook.com (260 3:10b6:510: 132::19 ) with Microsoft SMTP Server ( version=TLSl 2, cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id -15.2'0.,7409.46; Fri, 5 Apr — C U2‘i 1 I : 4:4 r 0u V u (mail -bnSnaml1lp2169.outbound . protection , outlook . com [ 104.47.58,169]) by relay.mimeoast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS ( version=TLSvl .2, cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id । —S 3 "“Hu ’! (ICCZGMgKXN t” Co IS 6vT A™ , F’ri z O1-^ Apt 2Q/4 1 ^'53'31 "-0^00 X-MC-Unique: hu7UCCZGMgKXNtCojS6vTA-3 Received: from DM5PR1501MB2071 , namprdl5.prod .outlook.com (2603: 10b6:4:a5::27} by IAlPR15MB6126.namprdl5.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:447 ;:20) with Microsoft SMTP Server ( version=TLSl 2, cipher=TLS ECDHE RSA WITH AES 256 GCM SHA384) id 15,20.7409.46; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:52:56 +0000 Received: from DM5PR1501MB2071.namprdl5.prod.outlook.com ( [fe80::3b69:7a0d:ae9a:7805)) by DM5PR1501MB2071.nanprdl5.prod.outlook.com {(fe80::3b69:7a0d:ae9a:7805%3]) with mapi id 15.20.7409.042; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:52:56 +0000 From: Mildred Dardis To: Complex Litigation Bureau , armando jacobfiqhts.com CC: Elvin Vu , Karl Schlecht , Jihoon Kim , Binh Nguyen , "Barkinskaya, E. Jennie" , "afornwalt@cgdrlaw.com" Subject: RE: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal Waller, et al.; KCSC #BCV-23~100822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4 Emails Thread-Topic: #11783-25 Nilka Cooks v. Krystal. Waller, et al.; KCSC #BCV-23-l00822 -Declaration Vol 3 of 4 Emails Thread-Index: AQHah4IWjcm+0BsF5UKqStDZqAJ7zQ== Return-Receipt-To: Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:52:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: msip labels: x -ms-1raffic typediagnost ic: 2 DM5PR1501MB2071 :EE I IA1PR15MB6126 : EE | CY4PEPF0000EDD5 :EE | PH7PR1 0MB5831 : EE - x -ms e x ch a n ge -se nd e rad che ck : 1 z-ms -exchange-antispam-relay: 0 X-Microsof t-Antispam-Untrusted: BCL : 0 - X Mi c r os g f t -A nt i spam-Mes s age -1nf o-Or i g i na1 : oGKz8y5YU/3AgXiaonkaPboPXuqBHzc9sW+xaSkx9yJJdMo 1f r qT c 0 9 v 0 0 6 0 c J i 8 p t n F a k q Y / a 3EX r / yi j S 0 / TTGu K 5 WD 8 i 9 9 3 B I PT 0 y 7 h E 5bQg c e pwqXy 5yd 9 d FqG +mxWS + FD2 D w 4 JwVJO U / / zavlwaXi PmaNNTc+hfR3f kpYT5UxW+d2cYbM9z2gW3dPXPw C 3 L 4 F v 5 V Fa 4 g kS govpI OMQ z y YG P f i 0 e 2 J KFJhRw5VSGU93cvtYixgWmrw5N98kYGqonXv0qS0HPR6gWi’J v U101M r 1 / B15 9E 8Wh D U 8 y q 0 m 3MX Vn QQU e , Iexg0bk8zol72fkGo/513R2UDw4Q7d5EFahjn6aGBlK07ki p j z G LraR FE S 3h f vs 0 u11 Vw V k g s g c B Rb R E W +MPq8AV9RDMicHS jQwiTY+CZkb6WNB7hrpcgqs6oYFyV7 3H 1 r N c r QK.K.D1uw k.D5Qa q j m j p 6 g w y k r a + Q 4 N zC /bco j i aFf EX 6iGnSI SKAUKL I r zhQhqWh 3 wd 9p r 3 - X Fo r e f r on t An t is pam- R epo r t n t r u s t e d : GIF : 2 55 . 2 5 5 . 2 55 . 2 55; CTRY : ; LANG : en; SCL : 1 ; SRV : ; IP 7 : NSPM; H : DM 5PR1501MB2 07 1 . namprdl5 . prod. outlook. com; PTR: ;CAT : NONE; SF3 : (13230031) (1 5) (366007) ( 376005) ; DIR : OUT; SFP : 11 0 2 - - - x -ms e x c h a n g& a n t i spam-me s s g e da, t a chunkccun t : - - - z ms e z c h a n g e an t ispam-me ss gedata-0: -='?utf- 8 ? B? W kR 3 Z D B w UU1yS1JXM z F2 TH V 3 FB Kb G 5 KK2 1X bW1E d H p 'iTFdKTTNU? = = ?ut f - 8 ? B ?bW 9vSEJUNC tKTS t B a B a Wmxa dn Z ne Hp Y S G d o N21jc36 YWJB?= - = ? u t f 8 ? B ? b GNOME t L Umh YVH pa iW Z T c 0 FN U 3B s bS t H 0T E W1BGU01 ’"oik- ' / s-V2JV?= c. - = ? u t f 3 ? B ? WN w UE h 2 a k o v U W d X ^VFLUraQrR z FNVkxGWF Itpln,T?= /-:■ t V > /\i ?u t f -8 ? B '? e n Ji V1V I b1JY W DNh 41A r e1V wTXo y THR Ob H J biMr LIT il ' 1 in i \ m C?= ’ - = ? u t f 8 ? B ? VE1SQnBEb01vT Gp L’ Ai JiSEZCTkVINj TOQnl d / I u 9 DP 2^3?= c p a x -m ' - = ?utf 8?B?ZHpoaGNuTmJIVDVq! ImVN k I SG J 4 cX ? u t f - 8 ? B ? T 01 3 aGRpMV F6 N 2 4 3 <1 FwUWZRMnhhdEpFUG 5' ' VN W dEZjUGI ' ' I I i. =?utf-8 ?B?b3ZudlNjdEV5WXdr 5 Uz 4 THNWc D Z FT i1 4 OE 4 akJGSUF nn l n m ib /;Nla?= =?utf-8?B?cHlkaONJQ3UxQkE4. 2 z g2 WmJ z U DBI e Vd U WUp dmlvaOI ' ' A/O?= 9GWXFQMUVW?= 0 AU vq? = -?utf -8?B?cS9XbTQwahr osu uznubuvux JDjAuwnistaK'JVcnBhWisn KnwNnlDL3YzaXp6?= =?utf-3?B?dVgxOU91MHlyMHdEdXpqbOVqSnlXcnZSbldjL3pPUERNSTZUbzhTT2x2RGlx?= =?utf-8?B?WmtWNlBGSnlyVHQyKzg2SkUyclZIcllaYkhkaWVCbjVOcHVzSGlZRGJSMU4z?= = ?utf-8?B?Y2g2eEhO&jdhOS8wN2 J2NVR4cVJ3imiUG8yM2xkJRlZibEw2ZCtwRUp5WlpF?= =?utf-8?B?R3gwblVUMlNHNjAleHhnZW54NjZVVFdjMWNsUHBVeldGVlMzR2V0S2NSMlVv?= =?utf-8?B?WUJBS313bklnSXpVbTVkTXBMczAyeGRRdkRRZDNqZHBXTWtRTkNtbUtvMzds?= =?utf-8?B?dlhHK0VrWk8xakJwalpmdjcwQlVYREpwaElBTmZuNzZqRkkwUTdQMzc5MlVI?= =?utf-8?B?d2EvazNlQzFSaHUrRUOOR2JCM3BTeUOOQXU5YW5vOHBTOUFZcWLSU5ubFVw?= -?utf 8?B?MVI2cEhGUOd4MU5oWUDUEllb2JneldlMUFocDhjMTIzeEMOODlqbUlpWGx6?= =?utf-8?B?VG13L21YM0tLQndJV3MzQzl0WkNmL01CSzRMdkhyaTFKcHQyRXp4rj0FpQi9Y?= =?utf-8?B?K0I2cllKaUVadmRQdmRMWTJMRks2bi9GNUtWdEt0c0YwR.G15TzdpWDRiMmZF?= =?utf-8?B?TjNROVZuVmdvVlVGMkJJUlZQeHk2SEYyYmF2WkpMaklCdlVDcTBFWUpXekVN?= =?utf-8?B?eUxpZU9Dd0UrWHolSjRwTFk3LytpL0FNMjNiZUtLSGZWaklJcThWaHIzRUM?= - = ?u t f 8 ?B? ZS 9 FNOdkTlQ3b3Ml dm Fn QX U1WEN1S G Y 4 Z1N z c j Q 0 WE FBQmc1Wk dWTWQ 3b z Jq?= =?utf-8?B?UmxyczFyNjNad2VjK3NycGttblNBcXczRFF6ckcySVFGYTNHL242Q110dlAw?= =?utf-8?B?WmlqQlBWTGVkNWx3Yk.NhM0o4RXVlSElWVGI3MVpjbDF2NDM2eko3dGtIdlVh?= =?utf-8?B?c3h3RWNsSjdZdVJhSWdEMEI3Y2Nvd3ZhSUZrY2JZLlFuTlVldEpGTGlvcTMv?= =?utf-8?B?T0tLcGpWcTNzMGVmUFRGYkljNXhmL0tlRDNXUTFaaU96NjExaU90S2xvZTZ0?= =?utf-8?B?dTZlMCtUU3czT2Z4dlpDYklBOHHRnhreGhrcHBzZGZrNWRWMmdzRitlSWRm?= ~?utf-8?B?ZFkxMFlqcOFYayt3a05KZnpJcOE3V2cOREtOOHdlcTVmSXgwMElIMGg3MGNU?= =?utf-8?B?Qm9UQzdkMFJYdm5NZndKSXAvSUtQTOxOdERCNOhmQm5KUStyaTBvczJDbGo2?= =?utf-8?B?VEc5L05zVzZ4TUHVOtOb2ZOaU15ROdOMkpvQXcOYOhudGdWMmpyRVZOdDdh?= =?utf-8?B?dThhVEwOSFZlbklsQlQzaDFNMlNvdmpZcytmbDhkYkVYYWJFSEhZSVFxRVZ5?= =?utf-8?B?OFR4YnltMUcxTW40djViVlREUEY2YjMzLytnbmNzMHozQktjN3IxcWlaOUZS?= =?utf-8?B?NjNZeFlvQmpiYTg3UU12UHVlQ0g50XdlN25PN31CU31RbHN2RjJmYys3cGRm?» = ? u t f - 8 ? Q ? wo 6 f rT iGFnOlYx 6PHg g Y18 nEN ?= MIME-Version : 1.0 - - X MS - E x cha n ge T r ansport- C r os s T e n an t Hea d e r s S t amped : I.T\1PR15 MB 612 6 - X Mi me ca s t - S pa m-Score : 0 X-Mimecast-Originator : tresslerllp. com Content Language : en-US Content-Type : multipart/iaixed ; boundary" 008 _DM5PR1501MB2071DBFC68A833EAE9A2724AB9032DM5PR1501MB2071_" Return-Path : mdardisgtressler lip . com 3 -- X EOPAttributedMessa g e: 0 - - X EOPTenantA11ribu t edMessage: 03e2a77e-576d 41 49 9e89-3e56df eded 41:0 X-MS-Ezchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: CV4PEPE0000EDD5,namprd03.prod .outlook .com X ~MS-Pub1 icTrafficType: Emai1 X MS Of fice365~Fi1taring Correlation. Id : 3904e72f 4877 4051 47If 08dc55997bel 1 STATE OF FLORIDA 2 PROOF OF SERVICE VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL (CCP § 1010.6, et seq., CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5) 3 4 — (Broward County Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court) (Fla. R. Jud. Admin. § 2.516) 5 Kern County Case Name: Nilka Cooks v, Krystal Waller, et al. Kern County Case Number: BCV-23-100£>~l'L 6 7 I , the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am a citizen of the United States, and the European Union, Country of Portugal, and resident of the State of 8 Florida. I am over the age of eighteen years old, and I am not a party to the above-entitled action. 9 On April 16, 2024, I have caused service of the following: 10 NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER 11 COMPEL DISCOVERY; DECLARATION OF JACOB O, PARTIYELI: On the following named person by causing an envelope to be addressed thereto as 12 follows, via Overnight Express mail, a copy of the foregoing documents enclosed and sealed therein, and said envelope deposited in the United States mail at City of Fort Lauderdale, 13 State of Florida, with postage thereon fully prepaid addressed as follows: 14 Attention: 15 Karl Schiecht, Esq. Jihoon Kim, Esq. 16 TRESSLER, LLP. 2 Park Plaza, Suite: 1050 17 Irvine, California. 92614 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California/ State of 19 Florida that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 16, 2024; City of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County; State of Florida. 20 /s/ Rubeiv Estrada, Pkt*. (Pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 668,S0(7)(b)) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FURTHER COMPEL DISCOVERY - 10