arrow left
arrow right
  • Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC -v- Quezada et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited  document preview
  • Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC -v- Quezada et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited  document preview
  • Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC -v- Quezada et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited  document preview
  • Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC -v- Quezada et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Vanessa Thomas, State Bar #323167 ELECTRONICALLY FILED RAUSCH STURM LLP SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 250 N. Sunnyslope Road, Suite 300 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Brookfield WI 53005 SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT Telephone: (877) 215—2552 . 3/25/2024 9'03 AM Facsimile: (877) 396-4464 E-mail Address: LawfirmCA@rauschsturm.com By; Joshua Gonzalez, DEPUTY ©OOQO\Ul-I>UJN>—t Attorneysfor Plaintlfi California License N0. 10685—99 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER CIVSBZ409798 GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING, LLC, ) Case N0.: ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR: ) 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT vs. ) (Rule 3.740 Collections) ) ADRIAN QUEZADA; ) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) PRAYER AMOUNT: $5,727.22 ) Defendants. ) LIMITED CIVIL CASE ) ) Plaintiff GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleges the following facts as t0 all causes 0f action as follows: NNNNNNNNNHHHHHHHHr—tt—t 1. Plaintiff is qualified t0 d0 business in California. 2. This Court is proper for this action because Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant ADRIAN OOQQUl-PUJNHOOOOQONUI-PWNHO QUEZADA is a resident Within the jurisdictional boundaries 0f this Court. 3. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant ADRIAN QUEZADA and Defendants sued by the fictitious names DOES 1 through 10 (“Defendants”) are responsible for the alleged debt; however, Plaintiff is unaware 0f the true names and capacities 0f DOES 1 through 10 and Will seek leave 0f this Court t0 amend this Complaint When the true names and capacities have been ascertained. 4. Plaintiff believes that at all times mentioned herein, Defendants, and each 0f them, were the agent, servant, employee, 0r employer, and acted in the capacity and as agent, 0f each and 0f the other Defendants. Plaintiff also believes that each 0f the Defendants is jointly and severally liable in the actions were taken for the benefit 0f the 1 4845681 COMPLAINT Defendants’ separate and/or community property. Plaintiff also believes that each 0f the Defendants is jointly and severally liable in that the actions were taken for the benefit 0f the Defendants' separate and/or community property. 5. Pursuant to California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(l), Plaintiff is a debt buyer as defined by California Civil Code, section 1788.50, subsection (a). ©OOQO\Ul-I>UJN>—t 6. Pursuant to California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(2), Plaintiff is seeking to recover the amount 0f $5,727.22 from Defendants. This is the past-due balance 0n a loan 0r borrower agreement, Which was obtained and used by Defendants in exchange for value received from the original creditor, LendingClub Bank, National Association, With the original account number ending in *****4826 (the "Account"). The amount due is the result 0f loan proceeds and/or goods accepted by Defendants that have not been repaid as agreed and, upon information and belief, were for personal, family, 0r household purposes. 7. Pursuant t0 California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(3), Plaintiff is the sole owner 0f the obligation sued upon. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy 0f the Bill 0f Sale(s). The account was purchased by the Plaintiff 0n 0r around November 30, 2022. 8. Pursuant t0 California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(4), the Account balance at the time of charge-Off was $5,727.22. NNNNNNNNNHHHHHHHHr—tt—t 9. Pursuant to California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(S), Plaintiff alleges that the date of the last payment was May 2, 2022. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2 is a true and OOQQUl-PUJNHOOOOQONUI-PWNHO correct copy 0f a transaction history for Defendants' Account. 10. Pursuant t0 California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(6), Plaintiff alleges that the name 0f the creditor at the time 0f charge-Off was LOAN ASSET ISSUER II LLC (serviced by Lending Club). On information and belief, Plaintiff further alleges that an address used by LOAN ASSET ISSUER II LLC (serviced by Lending Club) at the time 0f charge-Off was 71 STEVENSON STREET SUITE 300, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105. At the time 0f charge—off, the redacted account number associated With this debt was *****4826. 11. Pursuant t0 California Civil Code, section 1788.58, subsection (a)(7), Plaintiff alleges that the name 0f the debt0r(s) as it appears in the records 0f LOAN ASSET ISSUER H LLC (serviced by Lending Club) is ADRIAN 2 4845681 COMPLAINT