Preview
58-CV-24-200
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
4/17/2024 4:06 PM
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF PINE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Case Type: Other Civil
Blaze Credit Union, Court File No.: ______________
Plaintiff,
vs. CIVIL COVER SHEET
(Non-Family Case Type)
Black Forest Estates, a partnership consisting of Minn. R. Gen. Prac. 104
Dolores Skrien, Eleanor Hoefler, Jeanne
Roegge, and Deanna Erhart; Casey’s Retail
Company; and also all other persons unknown
claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in
the real estate described in the complaint herein,
Defendants.
Date Case Filed: April 17, 2024
This civil cover sheet must be filed by the initial filing lawyer or party, if unrepresented by legal
counsel, unless the court orders all parties or their legal counsel to complete this form. Once the
initial civil cover sheet is filed, opposing lawyers or unrepresented parties who have not already
been ordered to complete this form may submit their own cover sheet within ten days after being
served with the initial cover sheet. See Rule 104 of the General Rules of Practice for the District
Courts.
If information is not known to the filing party at the time of filing, it shall be provided to the
Court Administrator in writing by the filing party within seven (7) days of learning the
information. Any party impleading additional parties shall provide the same information to the
Court Administrator. The Court Administrator shall, upon receipt of the completed certificate,
notify all parties or their lawyers, if represented by counsel, of the date of filing the action and the
file number assigned.
1
58-CV-24-200
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
4/17/2024 4:06 PM
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
David J. Krco (#0389382) Unknown/Pro Se
Best & Flanagan LLP
60 South Sixth Street, Suite 2700 DEFENDANTS, Self-represented
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Ph: (612) 349-5676 Black Forest Estates
dkrco@bestlaw.com Present address unknown
Casey’s Retail Company
c/o C T Corporation System Inc.
1010 Dale Street North
St. Paul, MN 55117
1. Provide a concise statement of the case including facts and legal basis:
Plaintiff is seeking an order declaring the parties’ respective rights in a gap between
properties owned by Plaintiff and Defendant Casey’s Retail Company, determining that none of
the Defendants, except for Casey’s, have any right, title, or interest in the gap, and determining
that Defendant Casey’s is now the fee title owner of the gap and all land in the Revised Casey’s
Legal Description set forth in the Complaint such that the south boundary of the Blaze Property
and the north boundary of the Revised Casey’s Legal Description align without any gap.
2. Date Complaint was served: Affidavits of service will be filed upon completion of service.
3. For Expedited Litigation Track (ELT) Pilot Courts only:
a. □ the parties jointly and voluntarily agree that this case shall be governed by the Special
Rules for ELT Pilot. Date of agreement:
b. □ The court is requested to consider excluding this case from ELT for the following
reasons:
Note: ELT is mandatory in certain cases, and where mandatory, exclusion may also be
sought by timely motion under the Special Rules for ELT Pilot.
c. Anticipated number of trial witnesses: N/A
d. Amount of medical expenses to date: N/A
e. Amount of lost wages to date: N/A
f. Identify any known subrogation interests: N/A
4. Estimated discovery completion within 6 months from the date of this form.
2
58-CV-24-200
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
4/17/2024 4:06 PM
5. Disclosure / discovery of electronically stored information discussed with other party?
No □ Yes, date of discussion:
If Yes, list agreements, plans, and disputes:
6. Proposed trial start date: April 21, 2025
7. Estimated trial time: 1 days hours (estimates less than a day must be
stated in hours).
8. Jury trial is:
waived by consent of Plaintiff pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 38.02.
(specify party)
□ requested by (NOTE: Applicable fee must be enclosed)
(specify party)
9. Physical/mental/blood examination pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 35 is requested:
□ Yes No
10. Identify any party or witness who will require interpreter services, and describe the services
needed (specifying language, and if known, particular dialect): None known at this
time.
11. Issues in dispute: Plaintiff is seeking an order declaring the parties’ respective rights
in a gap between properties owned by Plaintiff and Defendant Casey’s Retail Company,
determining that none of the Defendants, except for Casey’s, have any right, title, or interest in the
gap, and determining that Defendant Casey’s is now the fee title owner of the gap and all land in
the Revised Casey’s Legal Description set forth in the Complaint such that the south boundary of
the Blaze Property and the north boundary of the Revised Casey’s Legal Description align without
any gap.
12. Case Type / Category: Contract (NOTE: select case type from Form 23,
Subject Matter Index for Civil Cases, appended to the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure).
13. Recommended Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism: Mediation
(See list of ADR processes set forth in Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 114.02(a))
Recommended ADR provider (known as a “neutral”): To be agreed upon by parties
Recommended ADR completion date: November 25, 2024
3
58-CV-24-200
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
4/17/2024 4:06 PM
If applicable, reasons why ADR not appropriate for this case:
By signing below, the attorney or party submitting this form certifies that the above information
is true and correct.
BEST & FLANAGAN LLP
Dated: April 17, 2024 /s/ David J. Krco
David J. Krco (#0389382)
60 South Sixth Street, Suite 2700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Ph: (612) 349-5676
dkrco@bestlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Blaze Credit Union
4
Preview
58-CV-24-200 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/17/2024 4:06 PM STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF PINE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Other Civil Blaze Credit Union, Court File No.: ______________ Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL COVER SHEET (Non-Family Case Type) Black Forest Estates, a partnership consisting of Minn. R. Gen. Prac. 104 Dolores Skrien, Eleanor Hoefler, Jeanne Roegge, and Deanna Erhart; Casey’s Retail Company; and also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. Date Case Filed: April 17, 2024 This civil cover sheet must be filed by the initial filing lawyer or party, if unrepresented by legal counsel, unless the court orders all parties or their legal counsel to complete this form. Once the initial civil cover sheet is filed, opposing lawyers or unrepresented parties who have not already been ordered to complete this form may submit their own cover sheet within ten days after being served with the initial cover sheet. See Rule 104 of the General Rules of Practice for the District Courts. If information is not known to the filing party at the time of filing, it shall be provided to the Court Administrator in writing by the filing party within seven (7) days of learning the information. Any party impleading additional parties shall provide the same information to the Court Administrator. The Court Administrator shall, upon receipt of the completed certificate, notify all parties or their lawyers, if represented by counsel, of the date of filing the action and the file number assigned. 1 58-CV-24-200 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/17/2024 4:06 PM ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS David J. Krco (#0389382) Unknown/Pro Se Best & Flanagan LLP 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 2700 DEFENDANTS, Self-represented Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: (612) 349-5676 Black Forest Estates dkrco@bestlaw.com Present address unknown Casey’s Retail Company c/o C T Corporation System Inc. 1010 Dale Street North St. Paul, MN 55117 1. Provide a concise statement of the case including facts and legal basis: Plaintiff is seeking an order declaring the parties’ respective rights in a gap between properties owned by Plaintiff and Defendant Casey’s Retail Company, determining that none of the Defendants, except for Casey’s, have any right, title, or interest in the gap, and determining that Defendant Casey’s is now the fee title owner of the gap and all land in the Revised Casey’s Legal Description set forth in the Complaint such that the south boundary of the Blaze Property and the north boundary of the Revised Casey’s Legal Description align without any gap. 2. Date Complaint was served: Affidavits of service will be filed upon completion of service. 3. For Expedited Litigation Track (ELT) Pilot Courts only: a. □ the parties jointly and voluntarily agree that this case shall be governed by the Special Rules for ELT Pilot. Date of agreement: b. □ The court is requested to consider excluding this case from ELT for the following reasons: Note: ELT is mandatory in certain cases, and where mandatory, exclusion may also be sought by timely motion under the Special Rules for ELT Pilot. c. Anticipated number of trial witnesses: N/A d. Amount of medical expenses to date: N/A e. Amount of lost wages to date: N/A f. Identify any known subrogation interests: N/A 4. Estimated discovery completion within 6 months from the date of this form. 2 58-CV-24-200 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/17/2024 4:06 PM 5. Disclosure / discovery of electronically stored information discussed with other party? No □ Yes, date of discussion: If Yes, list agreements, plans, and disputes: 6. Proposed trial start date: April 21, 2025 7. Estimated trial time: 1 days hours (estimates less than a day must be stated in hours). 8. Jury trial is: waived by consent of Plaintiff pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 38.02. (specify party) □ requested by (NOTE: Applicable fee must be enclosed) (specify party) 9. Physical/mental/blood examination pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 35 is requested: □ Yes No 10. Identify any party or witness who will require interpreter services, and describe the services needed (specifying language, and if known, particular dialect): None known at this time. 11. Issues in dispute: Plaintiff is seeking an order declaring the parties’ respective rights in a gap between properties owned by Plaintiff and Defendant Casey’s Retail Company, determining that none of the Defendants, except for Casey’s, have any right, title, or interest in the gap, and determining that Defendant Casey’s is now the fee title owner of the gap and all land in the Revised Casey’s Legal Description set forth in the Complaint such that the south boundary of the Blaze Property and the north boundary of the Revised Casey’s Legal Description align without any gap. 12. Case Type / Category: Contract (NOTE: select case type from Form 23, Subject Matter Index for Civil Cases, appended to the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure). 13. Recommended Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism: Mediation (See list of ADR processes set forth in Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 114.02(a)) Recommended ADR provider (known as a “neutral”): To be agreed upon by parties Recommended ADR completion date: November 25, 2024 3 58-CV-24-200 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 4/17/2024 4:06 PM If applicable, reasons why ADR not appropriate for this case: By signing below, the attorney or party submitting this form certifies that the above information is true and correct. BEST & FLANAGAN LLP Dated: April 17, 2024 /s/ David J. Krco David J. Krco (#0389382) 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 2700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: (612) 349-5676 dkrco@bestlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Blaze Credit Union 4