arrow left
arrow right
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC  vs.  PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 4/15/2024 2:10 PM 1 CIT/ ES FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK JURY DEMAND DALLAS CO., TEXAS DC-24-05517 Dominique Gadberry DEPUTY CAUSE NO. ______________ ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff, § vs. § 68th § _______ JUDICIAL DISTRICT PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION § § Defendant. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes Elite Turbine Maintenance, LLC (“Plaintiff”), complaining of PNC Bank, National Association (“Defendant”) and for cause of action would respectfully show unto the Court the following: I. CLAIM FOR RELIEF AND DISCOVERY PLAN 1. Plaintiff is seeking monetary relief of less than $250,000.00. 2. This case is a Suit involving less than $250,000.00 and is therefore governed under a Level Two (1) Discovery Control Plan pursuant to Rule 190.3 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. II. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff is a limited liability company doing business in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. 4. Defendant is a National Association and may be serviced with process by serving its registered agent, Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company, 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Texas 78701-3218. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 1 1640449.1 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. Plaintiff is a customer of Defendant. This suit arises from Defendant’s failure to reimburse Plaintiff regarding a check it paid whereby the Payee of the check had been clearly altered without Plaintiff’s permission. 6. Defendant conducts business throughout the State of Texas including Dallas County, which is where Plaintiff conducts its business. IV. SUMMARY 7. This suit is based on Defendant’s failure to reimburse Plaintiff for having paid a check in the amount of $66,239.20 whereby the Payee of the check had been altered. And though Defendant refunded $57,486.99 but fails to refund $8,752.21. 8. Plaintiff seeks damages for negligence, breach of contract, violations under Section 4.401 and 4.406 of the Texas Business Commerce Code (“BDD”) and Declaratory Relief under Section 37.001 et. seq. of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code. V. FACTS 9. A counterfeit Check Number 12279 dated October 4, 2023, in the amount of $66,239.20, (“Check”) was drawn from the Elite account number ending 4859 on Friday, October 20, 2023. A copy of the Check is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” for all purposes. 10. The Check was shown as pending on Friday, October 20, 2023, with no image of the check. The Check was shown as posted on Monday, October 23, 2023, and upon review of the image, Glenn Thompson, Controller of Elite, notified Defendant that the Check had been forged. The image of the check clearly showed that Payee was changed from being made payable to a PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 2 1640449.1 company to an individual. This alteration was very apparent to the naked eye and yet, Defendant failed to not only notice this alteration but failed to timely act on such notification and instead, allowed the check to be drawn on Elite’s account. 11. Defendant had ten (10) business days to investigate this alteration and wholly failed to do so. Ultimately, after contacting the payee bank, the payee bank returned $57,486.99. Defendant in turn remitted said funds back to Elite leaving an amount of $8,752.21 due and owing. 12. Defendant then sent a letter back to Mr. Thompson, dated February 15, 2024, a copy of which is attached hereto for all purposes, stating “[w]hile we sympathize with you in this situation, PNC has determined that it is not responsible for the amount that was not recovered, (“Loss”), and has completed its review of this Fraud Claim.” 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit “B” for all purposes is a letter to Defendant dated February 20, 2024, demanding a refund of $8,752.21. Attached hereto as Exhibit “C” for all purposes is Defendant’s response dated March 20, 2020. At no time did Defendant give a reason why it could not refund the $8,752.21 due and owing Plaintiff and instead took the position that it took appropriate steps, without stating the appropriate steps it took, and declined to remit $8,752.21. Attached hereto as Exhibit “D” for all purposes is letter dated April 11, 2024, from the undersigned again making demand to pay back the $8,752.21. 14. The facts clearly show that Check No. 12279 should have never been honored, especially since Defendant was notified of the forgery immediately upon being posted. Simply recovering funds from the depository bank was not sufficient. The entire amount should have been refunded. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 3 1640449.1 VI. A. FIRST CAUSE OF: NEGLIGENCE 15. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 16. Defendant was negligent for a number of reasons. First, Plaintiff notified Defendant of the forged check immediately upon being posted with the image showing the forged payee. Defendant failed to take immediate action to stop payment on the Check. Second, a simple review of the Check would have shown it had been altered. Third, at no time did or has Defendant provided Plaintiff with a reason why it is refusing to refund the $8,752.71 and instead generally stated after investing the matter, it was not negligent. 17. By virtue of its relationship with Plaintiff, Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty of care to not only stop payment on the forged check, but it also owed a duty of care to refund the $8,752.71 back to Plaintiff after it failed to stop payment on a check that had been clearly altered. 18. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s actions and failure to provide ordinary care and diligence for the benefit of Plaintiff as described above, Plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of no less than $8,752.71. 19. Consequently, Plaintiff seeks damages in a sum in excess of $8,752.71. B. SECOND CAUSE OF: SECTIONS 4.101 AND 4.06 OF THE TEXAS BUSINESS & COMMERCE CODE 20. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 21. Section 4-401 of the UCC provides that a bank can only charge those items which are “properly payable,” which means that the charge was fully authorized by the person who wrote the check. Accordingly, when the bank pays on a charge against a customer’s account based on a fraudulently altered and/or forged check, the charge cannot be properly payable. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 4 1640449.1 22. UCC Section 4-406 places a duty on the account holder to discover and notify of a forgery or alteration. The UCC mandates that pursuant to this duty, an account holder must exercise reasonable promptness in discovering and reporting the unauthorized charge but does not define what is reasonable promptness. 23. Here, the facts are clear, that the Check was dated October 4, 2023, it was shown as pending on October 20, 2023, and on or about Monday, October 23, 2023, it was shown as posted with the image available for Defendant’s review. It was then that Defendant was notified by Glenn Thompson, Controller of Elite of the forgery. So, to be clear, Plaintiff notified Defendant of the forged check before even receiving a bank statement. 24. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s actions and failure to exercise the care prescribed by Sections 4.401 and 4.406 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code as described above, Plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of no less than $8,752.71. 25. Consequently, Plaintiff seeks damages in a sum in excess of $8,752.71. C. THIRD CAUSE OF: BREACH OF CONTRACT 26. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 25 above. 27. Attached hereto for all purposes are Exhibits “E” and “F” are BBVA Compass Resolution dated October 16, 2007, and November 21, 2017, contractual relationship existed between Plaintiff and Defendant. Sometime after November 21, 2017, Defendant became the successor of Compass Bank through an acquisition. In summary, Exhibit E authorized Compass Bank to pay checks as authorized by Dale Griffin, III or John T. Jury. In this regard, neither Dale Griffin, III nor John T. Jury authorized the payment of the Check to Aureliano Velasquez. Exhibit F gives Compass Bank, and now Defendant the authority to honor checks made in payment of its PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 5 1640449.1 obligations as Dale Griffin, as the owner, deems appropriate. Again, Dale Griffin did not authorize a payment to Aureliano Velasquez. 28. Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiff by paying the forged check. 29. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s actions as described above, Plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of no less than $8,752.71. 30. Consequently, Plaintiff seeks damages in a sum in excess of $8,752.71. D. FOURTH CAUSE OF: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 31. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 30 above. 32. Actual controversies exist between Plaintiff and Defendant regarding the above allegations. Accordingly, pursuant to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 37.001 et seq., and additionally and especially under § 37.004, Plaintiff seeks a declaration of the rights, status, and other legal relations between and among Plaintiff and Defendant under the above-actions, duties, and applicable law. 33. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks, additionally and alternatively, the following declarations and orders: a. The Check clearly showed that it had been forged as the identity of the real payee had been removed. b. Plaintiff exercised reasonable care and promptness in notifying Defendant of the Check being forged while it showed as being pending on October 20, 2023. c. Defendant should have stopped payment of the forged Check when it was notified of the forgery, on Monday, October 23, 2023. d. Defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in stopping payment on the Check. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 6 1640449.1 e. Defendant was not within its rights and duties in refusing to pay Plaintiff $8,752.71. E. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: EXEMPLARY DAMAGES 34. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 33 above. 35. Plaintiff is entitled to exemplary damages from Defendant because it acted with the malice required to support an award of exemplary damages. Defendant acted with a specific intent to cause injury to Plaintiff or conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare of Plaintiff with actual, subjective awareness that Defendant’s conduct involved an extreme degree of risk of harm to Plaintiff. In particular, at no time did Defendant ever provide a basis for refusing to reimburse Plaintiff $8,752.71 after Plaintiff provided notice that such check had been forged. Defendant knew full well that it had been negligent, in honoring the Check at the time, it refused to reimburse Plaintiff the $8,752.71 after receiving demand for such reimburse. Instead of taking the right course of action, Defendant chose to “stonewall” Plaintiff forcing Plaintiff to file this lawsuit. The alternative would have been for Plaintiff to walk away and take a loss of $8,752.71. Bottom line, Defendant’s actions show it simply did not care and in doing so, showed a conscious indifference to the rights of Plaintiff. F. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND PRE AND POST JUDGMENT INTEREST 36. Plaintiff reasserts and incorporates herein by reference for all purposes the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 35 above. 37. Plaintiff would show that by virtue of Defendant’s conduct as referenced above, and by virtue of Sections 37.001 et. seq. and 38.001 et. seq. of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 7 1640449.1 38. In this regard, Plaintiff has found it necessary to employ the law firm of Cowles & Thompson, P.C. to prosecute this suit. As part of this agreement with said attorneys, Plaintiff has agreed to pay said attorneys reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees for prosecuting this suit, for which Plaintiff hereby sues and seeks recovery against Defendant in the following amounts: approximately $50,000.00 for preparation and trial, $35,000.00 for an appeal to the Court of Appeals, $35,000.00 for making or responding to an application for writ of error to the Supreme Court of Texas, $35,000.00 if an application for a writ of error is granted by the Supreme Court of Texas. 39. Plaintiff will further show that it is entitled pursuant to applicable Texas law, to pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest rates allowed by law for which Plaintiff hereby sues and requests judgment of this Court against Defendant. Plaintiff will show that it is entitled to the recovery of all costs of Court and expenses herein and sues herein for same. G. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: ALTERNATIVE PLEADINGS 40. Pleading further, paragraphs 1 – 39 are incorporated herein by reference. 41. Plaintiff would show that to the extent that any relief sought, or cause of actions asserted herein is inconsistent with any other relief or cause of action asserted or sought herein, Plaintiff hereby reasserts same in the alternative. VII JURY DEMAND 42. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all of the claims asserted herein. VIII PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully prays that it obtains judgment against Defendant as requested above, including the following: PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 8 1640449.1 (1) Plaintiff be awarded the actual, consequential, special damages and general requested above against Defendant; (2) Plaintiff obtain the declaratory and equitable and orders requested above, including the declarations and specific performance, as set out above; (3) Plaintiff recover the exemplary and punitive damages against Defendant requested above, without limitations in an amount to be determined including costs; (4) Plaintiff recover reasonable attorneys’ fees; (5) Plaintiff recover prejudgment and post judgment interest at the highest legal rate at law or in equity; and (5) Plaintiff be awarded such other and further relief, general or special, at law or in equity to which it may be justly entitled Respectfully submitted, By: __________________________________ WILLIAM L. SIEGEL Texas Bar No. 18342480 COWLES & THOMPSON, P.C. 901 Main Street, Suite 3900 Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 672-2000 (Tel) (214) 672-2326 (Fax) E-mail: bsiegel@cowlesthompson.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION – Page 9 1640449.1 2/20/24, 3:11 PM imageWindow View Image: ITEM DETAILS IMAGE FRONT ACCOUNT NUMBER Elite Turbine Maintenance LLC 4S54 Caire Chennault PNCllANK 1227� Addison, 1X 7.5001 X4859 972-735-8347 70-2189/7,.19 10/4/2023 ACCOUNT PAYTOTI-IE Aur_e_a II _no_e_a V I _sq ETM Checking x485 ORDER OF __ __________________ $"66,239.20 u_ez -=-- 9 Aurel!ano Velasquez AMOUNT 800 Lakeside Circle Apt 1134 Lewisville, TX 75057 $66,239.20 TRANSACTION DATE 10/20/2023 TRANSACTION TYPE Checks Paid IMAGE BACK REFERENCE NUMBER 00000012279 REFERENCE DETAIL CHECK 12279 0111 54629 .- . A https://www.treasury.pncbank.com/TSCIODWeb/readonlylOD.ht 1/1 William L. Siegel Tel: 214-672-2126 Fax: 214-672-2326 bsiegel@cowlesthompson.com February 20, 2024 VIA EMAIL michael.oliva@pnc.com AND CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6255 Michael Oliva Vice President Commercial Banking PNC Bank, National Association 200 Crescent Ct. 8th floor Dallas, TX 75201 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6262 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company, Registered Agent 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 Austin, Texas 78701-3218 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6279 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Carol A. Sarnowski, Registered Agent One PNC Plaza, 21st Floor, 249 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2707 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1030 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Kieran J. Fallon, Chief Risk Officer 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2401 1638533.1 B February 21, 2024 Page 2 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1054 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: William s. Demchak, Director 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2401 Re: Fraud Claim - Check # 12279 Dear Gentleman and Ms. Sarnowski: Please be advised that the undersigned represents Elite Turbine Maintenance, LLC (“Elite”) in reference to the above matter and is in response to your letter to Glenn Thompson, of Elite dated February 15, 2024. As you are well aware, counterfeit check number 12279, dated October 4, 2023, in the amount of $66,239.20, (“Check”) was drawn from the Elite account number ending 4859 on Friday, October 20, 2023. PNC Bank (“PNC”) was notified by Glenn Thompson on or about Monday, October 23, 2023 as the check image became available for review. The image of the check clearly showed that payee was changed from being made payable to a company to an individual. To be clear, this alteration was very apparent to the naked eye and yet, PNC failed to not only notice this alteration but failed to timely act on such notification and instead, allowed the check to be drawn on the account. As you well know, PNC Bank had ten (10) business days to investigate the issues and wholly failed to do so. Ultimately after contacting the payee bank, eventually the payee bank returned $57,486.99. PNC in turn remitted said funds back to Elite leaving an amount of $8,752.21 due and owing. As you are further aware, unless PNC Bank can show that Elite was negligent, the remainder of said funds should be remitted back to Elite. The facts clearly show that under no circumstances was Elite negligent nor has PNC alleged any negligence. Instead, per your letter, PNC has simply taken that “we sympathize with you in this situation, PNC has determined that it is not responsible for the amount that was not recovered, (“Loss”), and has completed its review of this Fraud Claim.” The facts clearly show that the Check No. 12279 should have never been honored especially since it was notified of the forgery while the check was shown as being pending. Demand is hereby made on PNC to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite. Otherwise, if PNC refuses to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite within the next ten (10), days, Elite will have no alternative but to file a claim with the Texas Department of Banking as well as the Office of Texas Attorney General. To ensure you receive this letter, a copy is also being sent via certified mail. 1638533.1 February 21, 2024 Page 3 Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours William L. Siegel 1638533.1 C William L. Siegel Tel: 214-672-2126 Fax: 214-672-2326 bsiegel@cowlesthompson.com April 11, 2024 VIA EMAIL michael.oliva@pnc.com AND CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1061 Michael Oliva Vice President Commercial Banking PNC Bank, National Association 200 Crescent Ct. 8th floor Dallas, TX 75201 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1078 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company, Registered Agent 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 Austin, TX 78701-3218 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1085 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Carol A. Sarnowski, Registered Agent One PNC Plaza, 21st Floor, 249 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15222-2707 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1092 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Kieran J. Fallon, Chief Risk Officer 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15222-2401 D 1640442.1 April 11, 2024 Page 2 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1108 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: William s. Demchak, Director 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15222-2401 Re: Fraud Claim - Check # 12279 PNC Reference Number 224058456831 Dear Gentleman and Ms. Sarnowski: This letter is a follow up to the letter I sent to you on February 20, 2024 on behalf of Elite Turbine Maintenance, LLC (“Elite”), a copy of which is attached to this letter. Further, this letter is in response to the letter I received from “Kendra M” i.e., Kendra McDonald, dated March 20, 2024. As a condition precedent to seeking attorneys’ fees, demand is hereby made on PNC to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite. Otherwise, if PNC refuses to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite and since thirty (30) days has already transpired from February 20, 2024, in addition to notifying the Texas Department of Banking, and the Office of Texas Attorney General, Elite will be filing suit where in addition to seeking the $8,752.21, Elite intends to seek reimbursement of its costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to Section 38.001 et. seq. and 37.001 et. seq. of The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. To ensure you receive this letter, a copy is also being sent via certified mail. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours William L. Siegel 1640442.1 William L. Siegel Tel: 214-672-2126 Fax: 214-672-2326 bsiegel@cowlesthompson.com February 20, 2024 VIA EMAIL michael.oliva@pnc.com AND CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6255 Michael Oliva Vice President Commercial Banking PNC Bank, National Association 200 Crescent Ct. 8th floor Dallas, TX 75201 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6262 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company, Registered Agent 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 Austin, Texas 78701-3218 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7022 3330 0001 8920 6279 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Carol A. Sarnowski, Registered Agent One PNC Plaza, 21st Floor, 249 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2707 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1030 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: Kieran J. Fallon, Chief Risk Officer 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2401 1638533.1 February 21, 2024 Page 2 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7021 2720 0000 3781 1054 PNC Bank, National Association Attn: William s. Demchak, Director 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15222-2401 Re: Fraud Claim - Check # 12279 Dear Gentleman and Ms. Sarnowski: Please be advised that the undersigned represents Elite Turbine Maintenance, LLC (“Elite”) in reference to the above matter and is in response to your letter to Glenn Thompson, of Elite dated February 15, 2024. As you are well aware, counterfeit check number 12279, dated October 4, 2023, in the amount of $66,239.20, (“Check”) was drawn from the Elite account number ending 4859 on Friday, October 20, 2023. PNC Bank (“PNC”) was notified by Glenn Thompson on or about Monday, October 23, 2023 as the check image became available for review. The image of the check clearly showed that payee was changed from being made payable to a company to an individual. To be clear, this alteration was very apparent to the naked eye and yet, PNC failed to not only notice this alteration but failed to timely act on such notification and instead, allowed the check to be drawn on the account. As you well know, PNC Bank had ten (10) business days to investigate the issues and wholly failed to do so. Ultimately after contacting the payee bank, eventually the payee bank returned $57,486.99. PNC in turn remitted said funds back to Elite leaving an amount of $8,752.21 due and owing. As you are further aware, unless PNC Bank can show that Elite was negligent, the remainder of said funds should be remitted back to Elite. The facts clearly show that under no circumstances was Elite negligent nor has PNC alleged any negligence. Instead, per your letter, PNC has simply taken that “we sympathize with you in this situation, PNC has determined that it is not responsible for the amount that was not recovered, (“Loss”), and has completed its review of this Fraud Claim.” The facts clearly show that the Check No. 12279 should have never been honored especially since it was notified of the forgery while the check was shown as being pending. Demand is hereby made on PNC to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite. Otherwise, if PNC refuses to remit the $8,752.21 back to Elite within the next ten (10), days, Elite will have no alternative but to file a claim with the Texas Department of Banking as well as the Office of Texas Attorney General. To ensure you receive this letter, a copy is also being sent via certified mail. 1638533.1 February 21, 2024 Page 3 Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours William L. Siegel 1638533.1 Nov/21/201711:09:59AM BBVA Compass 2547518211 4/5 BBVA Compass Certified Copy of Business Resolutions Full L~gal Nflnl~ ol Buslnuss: Elite Turbin@ Maintenance LLC Forni or C/~lly (cl,..,i· IJ/1•) D CorpQrnlla11 O PottMr!hlp O Anoc!nllon 0 LLC O Soto Pr01irlato~1lp O 0111'11 - ~ ~ - - ... 4500 Claire Chonnault St11ot Addl,san 'i,001 "'r J ~ . 1 1 9 w'ihi lli;l,,m: d t~Stii. qi Deposit Accounts And Rel11ted Services llfSOlVCO. llmt Comp•'" Bnnk(t~o 'B11t1lc1 1,do11!Jno10,1 n,n 1!epo,llol}' of tho nbovusmmod blfslnolis llnllly ltho 'llutlm1.s; Md lll,1 ono or mort oopolil a,:,:0un1s bf aponod ~nd mnlnutlnod 011 ll~l1n11 or tho Bu1i11011 will\ II•~ BMk by :my uno 01 u,o foll0\\'ll1g llfllM~ J\u111on1,t1 Rtpre,1:111nlivo11. 1ha1 Mtl• do~osh ~e~a1m1 1ho11 PQ govum~,, ~y th~ W~•1 •nd conrlillon, comnl11od on or rolom1d 10 le\ tho lllgno11Jn1 conJ!s) which Is ou1horl1orl to bno•11C<1111d, tl1•1 hmd, d•polilod In "''.r 11<111~111 aceo!.1'1\ m•y b• viltllcJr11Y111 1,y chock. (lr,f( 11010 or ordl)f or 1110 B1i,1oesi wnon slgnoti ~y Nil)' 011110 ro11QW1119 ·-·~ A111horl,od Ropro,onlollvor,: oPa1eGrfllm.U12ndJ2ba.IJ~ wh•m1 ,1w1iluro1 ,11011 bt '°'~Mil to t~a P•11k 011 !llo !lgrnnuro cord(!~ 01111 a~n~ 11 ,1,11tM~cel 1u pny iur.n el•tck~ dr~Ttr, nntn~ nr,1 r~, 1110!\llll b<,trCi'llod (\'11\ll lnlCt B~llk m1ty rvq.,1;0, 4nd 10 oxoc11to nnd doll'lllr from ~mo 10 limo ronow~l1 ctr oxion,l0111 of ,uch noto, or othor o,1,kmr.n• of lmlon1ntlnm1,: ~I 11> ro11111iy, 9,..,~ 11,11911. trl!n,ror. 1t•d9~. mo1t9~Q~ Ql'Pm Q »u,urit,Y ln1ero1t li. 01 ol11~,w110 hypo1nocmo ~na dollvo; ~>' 1ut~ lr\!11\lmon\; In v11fl(ny or olhorwl,u "' may bo domamlo11 by tho Bonk, nny ln•lrum,ml~ ocoounl• r•c11lvnt,10, d•PQ•J1 Hct:cLntls,. 11wontary, Dqufpmonl1 gcnorril lntnnalbln~ war(ll1t1.1!.e r~t:C!:lpl\ tims or lftdlrig. 1tar.k, l)on(J,4 ,1111n~ Pf.!P~t, tt':111 p1op,m1 01 •,1yot1w ~1'$0~~1 l"'<'P~rty ~ow or floroiltvr ovmurt orocqulrod by !Ito a.,11,,~s~ ,11no1y 1,0 rnq..troil tr1dlvlU1131 Ii~ 1l~n11loty 011 any parll:ulor nccount. flJIHi-tf.Jl Rl:SOLVSD. llllll lM 8Ullo\a;; fi9Hlllot: IU Jo 1nalnlnln lhe"'nRd•nllr1llly ol lh" ll)curlty codas usod to occos, sc1l11Uc11 10 Onllno 9unkh1~; onrl ti)•• prOVldeo In \ho Onlllll! ~•nklng hgrn,imnnt, lo lle~QPI 101pon1lbifily rot IIU lr~M!lllll >Mio. OUf Of ~~d bolWt\lln o! ~/ ill~ OMJlrlb Account& mmlt, u,111g lhll sOcuril)' emit\!, PUIHHER RffSOLVEO, lh~I !ho IQ11ol'llng ln~IYIIIUn( WIIO IS 6l onoJneQr ~f tllo Bu,lnoos Is a corpamllnl\ as,o,:lnUon 01 othor o.ndl~~ (l,) nPl\!11101 (if the l!uilnm Ii ll gcn~rol p11,111crshir,: Iii~ gtnill81 p1111ner (II rna PUll1\0iS II a Ul!lltOd Or toglstatod pnnnoroh/p), ~v) • ""1mbor or, II so [lfO,tdnd In tho Ou~lnuss' govomnnoo documon\~ n mmmgnr (II ma B11,l11<1i, Is ~n LLC), er M tho ownor (If Um Bu,lno,1 fa o solo wopH,rnr) Is outltarizad on baholr of tho Du,l11aa11: {n) lo Qfllnr Into tho o,~l11e Pinklllg Agreoment Dnd my oth~r ngrceni~ni, vn111 tho ea11k n~m11ry 10 err~cMnn 11111 fM,nesu· ~t1b1crlpll0<1 10 01~1no Unnk1t111: l~l lo lncludo oddltlonol Bnnk oocol!illl for wl,lch this lndlvld11el I,• ,lgnalo,y •• Onlln, Acco11111, wl1hln tho Busln"as· sutJscrlpllan to Onl1no B:rnk1ng; nt1cl t4 to mn'ko i1,aws on t!l'ICh IC~I\ lino Qf .:::odit. nnd ~to,tlil e~r(! oo:ovn! d~•lg~olrHI IIOW or /ti ti\~ lll1~r~ '' -~ o~n,10 Aae011n~ Vilr~lltlr In 1h110 tvtu/u1l~•1~ by''"' Auth~rlzad nutml.Onlnll\lo. or olhmWJim, imd rog:ilrdlu1lli ~, Whijttun lh'1 AlllhOdlr.ttl Ruprn,M:!1Uollvu 11. a ,l;rmlbry on thnl Onllnu /\t:counl: Authorized Rcpre5C11t8llve: 1IPbO t Juryand Kr/s Folllck and A. Dale Griffin III M!scellaneous RESOlVF.O,th11l Iha fellowing llulhonzoc! ~opro,ontnllvtr. JohnT.Ju @ t1 nuthortzod lo GlfflCUla • 'Tafaphom T,nnt,;(f)t f\(j\hcul1atJon' lorm which will dnsfgnato p,arum!!i autlrnlttca to give 1r:rep1iorlil ir,i11ur.1J¢111 ti) the Bl~k 1~ rran1lur rw1ds bftlYIHtt ;~l)el!led do1)(1Jl1 ~,C•11i10, ole tr/ lh~ :iun~1•llH'('l1\ FURlt'ltl?HtSOl..VEP U1i,111~ c.,iµ. IT~ ftt/ r.n lhlr"1: 1'Kl1ffl(tl?) lU lal1lt1'.,U\I.~ lho a1ilff1'Ui ttt:1n~rvy 1\(.1;0\ll\t lllJI · ~ l~o\~f\S. ~,u, C.OftlOIJII "' IU ICNAt ·""'l inRe, \l»il u~ 6,.1{1'11 )JWI t~tmttl clf.CIIJ) 1)01JG.I,' 111 V.llWKI ftmh ,,,.., ff!Jo)lnlbS oc UJ\1 rn~1,1'1;:rukM t)l h'ri?Oel\)f,1ft Ol lh,.'11,'t 1cwut,;c:m1 ,md uh,-.1 "' l'lf)~ ,1(!cnttit.L-dql '~CfiP' IIW!Ml. ~1flfl U).)I mu ~01'Q2'C..,i:-11n aq1Sr.v ,'1'1 •1ti lhn ~n.,tum r,f lhri ~l>d,vo l\';lt..'lrt l\u1ft:)f1~0tf ~tPfC18nl~fl\lC~ affa•r 011 '1-t•cf:nti ctt trur {lt1:-.,11l?v. rtlrlcnte I 1t;.rvo U\O iU'illllm lu thu tnaat;,\, kf~nhf,td lMfoW, """' ca:1 tify ~IOl. Tha l11hl1JAll1n i:1 ~ lui\ tlU~ andll'I iNlly ""'' Hlfl\Mllly OtlOfl\1(1 ~ ,,, lh4 llo.,d o< 0,,or.10.. , M i\M Gm'inl;sl l'anitf)tt. (,1 tho 8utll*.:t.$ • n Uh~ f1.:\lt1111rfhl1~ ar r<11g1,1c,Q\J l1trll'\(i'Jh1pJ. ~ 1\11 l/~"''•P•,. '"'"'!Pl" If the RIK"""" R11tt.Cl w Iv) O..nv, om., !lu1JtQ11S ,1 R~ r,oprcui,il!l11l (Vt nnd lawil'I ;,,,ou,,.y 10 IMlo~t n.. r~1\Qlt> Mil~ t:~lt.tt 1l1u po,,i.cts, 1)1:v\lcd tti tho /1u1hot1.a:',,'d fltt110f\, 't\-tt0 tt.w. lutl po'o'A!l .-w:1d bwM .ttHIWJMT 10 i:,i.1..'f(i\.(\'tllC~1ni!. l'lk!tO li 110 (lr:Wl~ft In lhQ fl.'117,J\,(. t;1q1taf, Ry-l.IW.".. Dt MY {lllktf lV{lftf\lJAlt~t,7,1 (!Ot\Mr'l,:.-J'!i. ot ~wrronil'J\I~ ~f dltt 11;;tVti!:~':ri~rih~~~~!!~,':;::;~1~:·:1:~:i~= ~~;:~,::;I~ l1~~~~r:;"r:, ~~:~ 1 1 1 1 :~:~~~ t11!1llUIIOr.-i Oli O(l~,lt =~ JIX\lf.!.'¢ :ind Q,tol~ -\111~m AIU~~ HI ru11 f(lt~ ~~ 11u.xt. On'lll Jlf)I uatl'I \llttt.'111lf;(I Qf' n:JV'Pku,.J, t.r1tl 11:wu U~n ff'C(lfdUr.1 rn ii"~ ,11,rt::110 fNH\lili of llv.i. U,1':ltw:.>~ qnd th,ll t111.1 Jp1u:(num ,1g,1i,t\1hK bl.'klW 4,.., 11~ ~r!l"-liurai c'il lh1t At.lLMtitod ,,,::~•:::::;;=••l,011111d In.Cl I01ihoU11:~_.,,!21h-.---~i• m'$u~~-~ ~~ _Q ~cll.QT Jur.· l:.!1Un1vrY < !?tctl'1""~?>...l - -- ----~"rtJ'r,t'"=--~-·---,.L,o::;._ 1 11 ~dlft::H:tir: C~.,M,:.,••----, £()1Jinf~l.,~1llf_<}J!J)~,lr~Cf1Ul!IL!.'O.!ll!!~, i > ' r , ~ ~ I L . - - - - - - - - -- ---- r:1;;,rg ~ l~a::~G-- ffl,fj ,..,,1/(ic,,to1tlif~( ,,.. ,,t>tr1J1lqi1Jd (1ythaindn"Ht11."lll~1/rt1t111rt1v,,ri,,rmrt,tlU\v• 1bt•ltJ11t. • CIIM l!Jr.\ MrrntM"f'N, 1t1Ml LC ti lttlmA!JN•nlMlt!J')r., ~ ""' t.!.•ntgtlf' II flV lntJ,ftN:r /J ,,,r '1U«fttt1w,, iiy.'Ut Qn't(W' 1/'lh,> 0111in~sI/.., $Q,C,P/~(l•ltWJltl}V,y /ho 0,\11,·rlS~•~l'IO/U1f!Jt:f C(lfl?MJIJ•'/.l/J/J's.I/!j)"£i1!J;,1uet/JII/JJ!ftJ.llllPmJtllt.l'!'./!;!(!1!,$/,MUQC.(tC<1'll."'!W..~•QU!,if.J(IJo;•I/ Gt•ttr!J?IP&·uum rf UtiUUJ,\11•,,s no lf!Pllfl'lor RrQJtUtruJ!tKJ~ By $19""'!1 bCkM. c1cl1 t•>1111n1• •1111""' •••I 11n,n" • n nny ,nhd( ramm 1,m:QO'l(\J hlU1f1'l:\l"11 f+I thufl~•\11'11.'a n~ ll ('llftl\l'lr "' lht! vi1dcr0t91rm l':I I! cmi IQ'J;\:lor)I.IIJp ff. jL1tl/ll'f\ i< IIIIOJ'IHI In ,ny W'l!J ,,... ""'"'",le, ~ U,. l)wr,,.1, •h•l »•mmo m..~,,.,»to;) 11..• ,,g.,.,~••v Ml ""~'r Um llw P,Otnpt!J, ' l>l>l\'1!11>1"~1~ °"'i IJIOCW~lloa\ 0< IOf -'":1 P,rini:4itit) o~Cb..."mQrU,, t,;y~tWl QI' ,~11,r.,n:nl or i:jn~ potlfll'f, lhl: t«&i!'IPOII Q~(il'!.1 'iJf 1nc1.e l'IQW ~lll•JllfS. o, ~horwii"- ;u-,d ~h\-1tl1,l(l,1'1;r1p 11ny nofl(l"g al w~, u-re~ U1,;jl U11: H;anl,; •~y 111r.QLyg, U1q. .~i,;lf)Qhl)' ftl(.QiJt!l/,\111 ,n U\I\ f.ttrlsf~Ult 'au,u trmt,mi..' IQ IH': ,~rttllrl!l IIJH)rl (-:.,,(1'1 "' U'ki u1',,t!Oc!l,)l)nt:d 111111:nt11.:i·:r ll1r.:1 tRQ1.ll r,,,1r._1t,0Naltt;•M. ,i:trJ thl.t lsu\:IM!"' W\tt v.r,U~f1 flctl)(tl IOIIKI cont,(l!'y, "iPIOU ti.y l)f'IQCIIU1ill l~l(l(jl~1'1'PO o.~ 111 ®1'; ~~~:,:I ~::.;;:4~~~~~i::~=::=~!:J::::~,t4~1 ~ktt1Ul1M Cl 0~ I ~- I~ '::r'lo'--...:;...,"'""'4=~- ~•tv b111nhtns lml!t for you. i L\,l~tt-,tf l\U.t.lt,;,ut;1a ~ Compass Bank 13748799 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (L.L.C.) RESOLUTIONS By ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Limited Liability Company 4502 CLAIRE CHENNAULT ST (Address) ADDISON TX 75001-5321 (City, State and Zip Code) A. I, A, Dale Griff in certify that I am owner of the above-named limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of - - - - - - - - ~ Federal Tex I.D. Number_2"-0'-·-"-3-"-9•5""5-"-0-"-3...t _ _ _ _ _ _ _, engaged in business under the trade name of ELITE TURBINE MAINTENANCE, LLC ~ , and that the following is a correct copy of resolutions adopted at a duly and properly called meeting held on September 2 0 . ~ , of all members of this limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "Members") or the persons designated by the Members of this limited liability company to menage the limited liability company as provided in the organizational documents and agreements of this limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "Managers"!. These resolutions appear in the minutes of that meeting and have not been rescinded or modified. B. Be It Resolved That: ll) Compass Bank, a bank organized under the laws of the State of _ _T_e_x_a_s_________ ("Compass Bank"I, is designated as depository for the funds of this limited liability company. (2) This resolution shall continue to have effect until express written notice of its rescission or modification has been received and acknowledged in writing by Compass Bank. (31 All transactions, if any, with respect to any deposits, withdrawals, discounts, rediscounts, and borrowing by or on behalf of and/or in the name of this limited liability company with Compass Bank and/or its affiliates prior to the adoption of this resolution are hereby ratified, approved, and confirmed. 141 Any of the persons named below are authorized to make, execute and deliver any and all contracts, agreements, instruments, stipulations, deposits, orders and withdrawals for end as the act of this limited liability company which any of the persons named below may deem advisable for the effective exercise of the powers indicated below from time to time with Compass Bank and/or its affiliates concerning funds on deposit at Compass Bank, money borrowed from Compass Bank and/or its affiliates, any other products or services offered by Compass Bank and/or its affiliates or any other business transacted by and between this limited liability company and Compass Bank and/or its affiliates subject to any restrictions stated below, all on such terms end conditions es the persons named below shall deem appropriate. (5) Any and ell prior resolutions adopted by the Members or Managers of this limited liability company, as the case may be, and delivered to Compass Bank as governing the operation of this limited liability company's eccountls), are in full force and effect, as supplemented or modified by this authorization. (6) This limited liability company agrees to the terms end conditions of any agreements relating to any accounts opened by any of the authorized persons set forth below for this limited liability company and authorizes Compass Bank, at any time, to honor and charge this limited liability company for all checks, drafts, or other items or orders for the payment of money that are drawn by or in the name of this limited liability company on Compass Bank, regardless of by whom or by what means, including facsimile or other signature(s) that may have been affixed to any such checks, drafts or other orders, so long as they resemble the facsimile or other signature specimens set forth below (or the facsimile or other signature specimens that this limited liability company has provided Compass Bank from time to time). whether drawn to or in favor of any of the undersigned or otherwise or whether tendered or otherwise made in payment of individual obligations of any of the undersigned or otherwise. F Data Entry (Bagi Form #9 9/1 2-1983 Side A {9/981 (JetForm - C1 21983) ..... AL/AZ/CO/FL/NE/NM/TX (7) As indicated, any person listed (subject to any expressed restrictions set forth below) is authorized for and as the act of this limited liability company to: Facsimile Signature Names and Title (if used) (a) A DALE GRIFFIN Ill SIGNER (b) JEFF LOADMAN SIGNER INDICATE a, b, c, and/or d: _ _ _ _m ____.__.fl~.-w',Bt-(,=- Exercise all of the powers listed in (iii through (v). _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(ii) Open and maintain any deposit or checking account(s) with Compass Bank and/or obtain any