On November 01, 2022 a
Verdict
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mcinerney John Jack,
Mcinerney John "Jack",
and
Board Of Regents Of The University Of California,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILED
Superior Court of Califia
\e-
‘ounty of Los Angeles
Revie Act WITH SPECIAL FINDINGS OF FACT INC AR AS 2024
David W. Slayton, Executive Ofice'Clerk of Court
By: G. Vela, Deputy
1. Was UCLA’s decision not to. hire i. MVv cInerney based solely on Mr.
ob
MclInerney’s conduct during the process?
Yes
No 4
If your answer is “yes,” stop here, have the foreperson sign this form and return
with it to the courtroom.
2. Was UCLA's decision to find plaintiff disqualified for the position in issue a
decision made solely (only) based on the plaintiff’s prior criminal history?
Yes
Noy
If your answer is yes, stop here and return the signed form to the court. If your
answer is no, go on to the next question.
3. Was the fact that plaintiff had a prior criminal history a substantial factor in
4h UCLA’s finding that plaintiff was disqualified for the position?
Yes
No x
If your answer is yes, stop here and return the signed form. If it is no, go on to the
next question
f If the plaintiff had been afforded the full 5 business days to respond, assuming
the burden was on the defendant to prove that he would not have submitted
the information he now claims within the longer time period, has defendant
met that burden such that the Jury finds that plaintiff would not have
submitted it?
Yes
~~
No
Ee
¢
If your answer is “yes,” it would not have been submitted, stop here and submit the
signed form to the Court. If your answer is “no,” go on to the next question.
» i baie niacuntens meetin J nw omc mato
SEEN SEERA
5. Would UCLA have reached the same decision and not hired Mr. McInerney if
he had provided evidence of rehabilitaton or mitigating circumstances to UCLA
within the 5 business days and with having that information having reached Mr.
Solana bnba been additionally considered along with all other matters before him
before any final decision was then made?
Yes 4
No
The foreperson is requested to please sign and date the form and return with it to
the courtroom.
moomoo aE O ule geRe sta tote sed RRSP
Foreperson signature
Vairoy Ann
Foreperson print
movi
na eeestsacingnnrage spot CMREAN AEBI
Document Filed Date
April 12, 2024
Case Filing Date
November 01, 2022
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILED Superior Court of Califia \e- ‘ounty of Los Angeles Revie Act WITH SPECIAL FINDINGS OF FACT INC AR AS 2024 David W. Slayton, Executive Ofice'Clerk of Court By: G. Vela, Deputy 1. Was UCLA’s decision not to. hire i. MVv cInerney based solely on Mr. ob MclInerney’s conduct during the process? Yes No 4 If your answer is “yes,” stop here, have the foreperson sign this form and return with it to the courtroom. 2. Was UCLA's decision to find plaintiff disqualified for the position in issue a decision made solely (only) based on the plaintiff’s prior criminal history? Yes Noy If your answer is yes, stop here and return the signed form to the court. If your answer is no, go on to the next question. 3. Was the fact that plaintiff had a prior criminal history a substantial factor in 4h UCLA’s finding that plaintiff was disqualified for the position? Yes No x If your answer is yes, stop here and return the signed form. If it is no, go on to the next question f If the plaintiff had been afforded the full 5 business days to respond, assuming the burden was on the defendant to prove that he would not have submitted the information he now claims within the longer time period, has defendant met that burden such that the Jury finds that plaintiff would not have submitted it? Yes ~~ No Ee ¢ If your answer is “yes,” it would not have been submitted, stop here and submit the signed form to the Court. If your answer is “no,” go on to the next question. » i baie niacuntens meetin J nw omc mato SEEN SEERA 5. Would UCLA have reached the same decision and not hired Mr. McInerney if he had provided evidence of rehabilitaton or mitigating circumstances to UCLA within the 5 business days and with having that information having reached Mr. Solana bnba been additionally considered along with all other matters before him before any final decision was then made? Yes 4 No The foreperson is requested to please sign and date the form and return with it to the courtroom. moomoo aE O ule geRe sta tote sed RRSP Foreperson signature Vairoy Ann Foreperson print movi na eeestsacingnnrage spot CMREAN AEBI