arrow left
arrow right
  • Cavalry Spv I, LLC -v- Lizama Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Cavalry Spv I, LLC -v- Lizama Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Cavalry Spv I, LLC -v- Lizama Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Cavalry Spv I, LLC -v- Lizama Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

File No. 23—45660—0 Robert Scott Kennard State Bar No. 117017 Gloria zarco ELECTRONICALLY FILED State Bar No. 199702 SUPERKNQCOURTOFCAUFORNM NEHLSODJ & I§ENKUURD CCNJNTYKDFSSANIBERbUURDHQO 5011 Dudley Blvd., Bldg. 25o, Bay G SANBERNARDWKHmSTmCT McClellan, CA 95652—1020 3M5QOZ4¢29PM P.O. Box 13807 By: Sabrina Jamison, DEPUTY Sacramento, CA 95853 Telephone: (916) 920—2295 Facsimile: (916) 920—0682 Attorneys for Plaintiff CAVALRY SPV I, LLC as assignee of Synchrony Bank 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT — LIMITED CIVIL CASE 11 12 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC as assignee of CASE NO.CWVSBZ408703 Synchrony Bank 13 COMPLAINT FOR ACCOUNT STATED; Plaintiff, MONEY LENT 14 VS. 15 (DEMAND AMOUNT: $2,626.39) CINDY c LIZAMA 16 and DOES 1 to lO, Inclusive, 17 18 Defendants. 19 Plaintiff alleges and complains as follows: 20 PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS 21 22 Plaintiff, CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, as assignee of Synchrony Bank, 23 as issuer of the Ashley credit card account, complains of 24 Defendants, and each of them, singularly and collectively, that: 25 l. The true names and capacities of Defendants herein sued by 26 the fictitious names as DOES l to 10, Inclusive, are unknown to 27 Plaintiff, who therefore sues those Defendants under, pursuant to, 28 l Complaint and in accordance with the provisions of Section 474 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will ask leave of court to amend this complaint as and when the true names and capacities of Defendants named herein as DOES l to 10 have been ascertained. 2. At all times herein mentioned, Defendants, and each of them, were the agents, servants and employees of each other and every remaining Defendant, and in doing the things alleged, were acting in the course and scope of said authority of such agents, 10 servants, and employees. 11 3. Plaintiff is now and was at all times herein mentioned a 12 limited liability company, authorized to do business in the State of 13 California. 14 4. Plaintiff is a debt buyer as defined by Section 1788.50 of 15 16 the CA Civil Code. Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel’s application 17 for license pursuant to Financial Code Section lOOOOO et. seq. are 18 pending issuance with the Nationwide Multistate Licensing and 19 Registry and/or the California Department of Financial Protection 20 and Innovation. 21 5. Section 1788.50 of the CA Civil Code is applicable to this 22 action as the debt subject to this lawsuit was purchased by 23 24 Plaintiff after January 1, 2014. Plaintiff is the sole owner of the 25 debt at issue. 26 6. Plaintiff is in compliance with Section 1788.52 of the CA 27 Civil Code. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy 28 2 Complaint