arrow left
arrow right
  • Liquidibee 1 Llc v. Barbers Only Magazine Llc D/B/A Barbers Only Magazine Llc, Vindell McgillOther Matters - Contract - Other document preview
  • Liquidibee 1 Llc v. Barbers Only Magazine Llc D/B/A Barbers Only Magazine Llc, Vindell McgillOther Matters - Contract - Other document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2024 09:18 AM INDEX NO. 509876/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ----------------------------------------------------------------X LIQUIDIBEE 1 LLC, Index No.: 509876/2024 Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION OF -against- SERVICE BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC D/B/A BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC et al, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) YESHAYA GORKIN, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of the State of New York, hereby affirms, under the penalty of perjury, as follows: I am a partner of Ainsworth Gorkin PLLC, attorneys for Plaintiff, am over the age of 18, am not a party to this action, and am a resident of the State of New York. On, 4/8/2024, I caused to be served a true and accurate copy of the NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING and SUMMONS WITH NOTICE upon BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC D/B/A BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC, by certified mail, return receipt requested, by depositing the same in an official depository under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of New York designated for that purpose, addressed to: BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC D/B/A BARBERS ONLY MAGAZINE LLC 76 UPPER ALABAMA STREET, ATLANTA, GA 30303 The forgoing method of service was authorized by Defendants under the Merchant Agreement, which is the subject to the dispute herein (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A). The Appellate Division, Second Department has held that service of process by mail as per the terms of a written agreement is sufficient and reasonably calculated to apprise a defendant of the pendency of a lawsuit. See Matter of New York Merchants Protective Co., Inc., v. Mima’s Kitchen, Inc., 114 A.D.3d 796 (2d Dep’t 2014); see also, Matter of Fernandez (Universal Underwriters Ins.) Co., 130 A.D. 2d 657 (2d Dep’t 1987). Dated: New York, New York April 9, 2024 Yeshaya Gorkin, Esq. 1 1 of 1