On August 11, 2021 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Souter, Amy,
Souter, Scott,
and
City Of Hesperia,
Does 1-20,
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Sandra,
for Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
BORDIN SEMMER LLP
Joshua Bordin—Wosk, State Bar No. 241077
ibordinwosk(iDbordinsemmer.com
Corey X. Argumosa, State Bar No. 322583
AWN
cargumosadDbordinsemmencom F I L E D
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
Playa District COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
6100 Center Drive, Suite 1100 SAN BERNARDINO DlSTRICT
Los Angeles, CA 90045 SEP 2 7 ZUZZ
Telephone: (323) 457-21 10
\OOONQM
Facsimile: (323) 457-2 120
Attorneys for Defendant,
Bug#— PAO E AN" Z. DEPUTY
CITY OF HESPERIA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
11
12
SCOTT SOUTER, an individual; AMY Case No.: CIVSB2123072
13 SOUTER, an individual,
(Assignedfor allpurposes t0 the Hon. John
14
Plaintiffs, M. Pacheco; Dept. S31)
15
V. DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S
16
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
CITY OF HESPERIA, a public entity; SANDRA MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL
17 GONZALES-RODRIGUEZ, an individual; and
INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE;
DOES through 20, inclusive,
1
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
18
AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF
19
Defendants. COREY X. ARGUMOSA
[Exemptfrom filingfee pursuant to
20
Government Code section 61 03]
21
[Filed Concurrently with Separate
Statement]
22
Complaint Filed: August 11, 2021
23
Trial Date: None Set
24
Hearing:
25 Date: October 10, 2022
Time: 8:30 a.m.
26 Dept: S3 1
27
28
BORDIN SEMMER LLP
61 00CENTER DRIVE
SUITE 1100 DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S OPPOSITION TO PLANTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
LOS ANGELES, CA 90045
(323) 457—21 1o
RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
V ‘ ’
V
T0 THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 0F RECORD
HEREIN:
Defendant CITY OF HESPERIA (“Defendant”) hereby submits its Opposition to Plaintiff
.p SCOTT SOUTER’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Amended Special
Interrogatories, Set One. Further, pursuant t0 Code of Civil Procedure Section 2030.300, subdivision
(d), Defendant hereby moves that the Court impose a sanction against Plaintiff SCOTT SOUTER
\OOOQONUI
and Plaintiff‘s counsel Flesher Schaff & Schroeder, Inc. and Jacob D. Flesher, jointly and severally,
in the amount 0f $925.00 for unsuccessfully making a motion to compel without substantial
justification.
10 This opposition is based upon the attached memorandum 0f points and authorities, the
W
11 declaration of Corey X. Argumosa, the entire record in this case and all discovery questions and
12 responses to date, and upon any further materials or argument considered by the Court.
13 Dated: September 27, 2022 BORDIN SEMMER LLP
14
15
By:
16 Joshua Bordin-Wosk
Corey X. Argumosa
17 Attorneys for Defendant,
CITY OF HESPERIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BORDIN SEMMER LLP i
6100 CENTER DRIVE
SUITE 1100 DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S OPPOSITION TO PLANTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
L05 ANGELES, CA 90045
(323) 457-21 ‘IO
RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
Document Filed Date
September 27, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 11, 2021
Category
Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
BORDIN SEMMER LLP Joshua Bordin—Wosk, State Bar No. 241077 ibordinwosk(iDbordinsemmer.com Corey X. Argumosa, State Bar No. 322583 AWN cargumosadDbordinsemmencom F I L E D SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA Playa District COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO 6100 Center Drive, Suite 1100 SAN BERNARDINO DlSTRICT Los Angeles, CA 90045 SEP 2 7 ZUZZ Telephone: (323) 457-21 10 \OOONQM Facsimile: (323) 457-2 120 Attorneys for Defendant, Bug#— PAO E AN" Z. DEPUTY CITY OF HESPERIA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 11 12 SCOTT SOUTER, an individual; AMY Case No.: CIVSB2123072 13 SOUTER, an individual, (Assignedfor allpurposes t0 the Hon. John 14 Plaintiffs, M. Pacheco; Dept. S31) 15 V. DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S 16 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S CITY OF HESPERIA, a public entity; SANDRA MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL 17 GONZALES-RODRIGUEZ, an individual; and INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; DOES through 20, inclusive, 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 18 AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF 19 Defendants. COREY X. ARGUMOSA [Exemptfrom filingfee pursuant to 20 Government Code section 61 03] 21 [Filed Concurrently with Separate Statement] 22 Complaint Filed: August 11, 2021 23 Trial Date: None Set 24 Hearing: 25 Date: October 10, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. 26 Dept: S3 1 27 28 BORDIN SEMMER LLP 61 00CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1100 DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S OPPOSITION TO PLANTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 (323) 457—21 1o RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE V ‘ ’ V T0 THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 0F RECORD HEREIN: Defendant CITY OF HESPERIA (“Defendant”) hereby submits its Opposition to Plaintiff .p SCOTT SOUTER’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Amended Special Interrogatories, Set One. Further, pursuant t0 Code of Civil Procedure Section 2030.300, subdivision (d), Defendant hereby moves that the Court impose a sanction against Plaintiff SCOTT SOUTER \OOOQONUI and Plaintiff‘s counsel Flesher Schaff & Schroeder, Inc. and Jacob D. Flesher, jointly and severally, in the amount 0f $925.00 for unsuccessfully making a motion to compel without substantial justification. 10 This opposition is based upon the attached memorandum 0f points and authorities, the W 11 declaration of Corey X. Argumosa, the entire record in this case and all discovery questions and 12 responses to date, and upon any further materials or argument considered by the Court. 13 Dated: September 27, 2022 BORDIN SEMMER LLP 14 15 By: 16 Joshua Bordin-Wosk Corey X. Argumosa 17 Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF HESPERIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BORDIN SEMMER LLP i 6100 CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1100 DEFENDANT CITY OF HESPERIA’S OPPOSITION TO PLANTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER L05 ANGELES, CA 90045 (323) 457-21 ‘IO RESPONSES TO AMENDED SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE