Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER: FOR COURT USE ONLY
NAME: Vikranth Sunderraj Esp (SBN 225636) Michael Vroman (SBN 247763)
FIRM NAME: Tenant Law Group
STREET ADDRESS: 1000 Pine Street, Ste 1250
CITY: San Francisco STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 94111
TELEPHONE NO.: (888)510-7511 FAX NO.: (888)376-1662
EMAIL ADDRESS: info@tenantlawgroupsf.com
ATTORNEY FOR (name): Plaintiffs Jennifer Bogdis and Peter Bogdis
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Mateo
STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center
MAILING ADDRESS: 400 County Center
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Redwood City, CA 94063
BRANCH NAME: Hall of Justice and Records
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bodgis, et.al
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal et. al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22-CIV-04323
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $35,000
exceeds $35,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: April 8, 2024 Time: 9:00 Dept.: 23 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Vroman
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Jennifer Bogdis and Peter Bogdis
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 17, 2022
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Complaint for (1) Breach of Warranty of Habitability; (2) Breach of Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment; (3) Negligence; (4)
Constructive Eviction; (5) Violation of California Civil Code 789.3; (6) Violation of California Civil Code 1940.2
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] www.courts.ca.gov
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER:
22-CIV-04323
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal, et al.
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings; if equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief):
Plaintiffs were tenants at 804 S. Idaho St, San Mateo, CA 94402, a residential property owner or managed by defendants until
December 1, 2021. Trhoughout Plainitffs tenancy, Defendants faildd to remedy substantial habitability defets and dangerous
conditions at the property notwithstanding Plaintiffs complaints. Plaintiffs seek economic damages, non-economic damages
(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
5. Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial):
6. Trial date
a. The trial has been set for (date):
b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain):
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
Jun 3-July 8 2024 (trials); July 15-22 2024 (trial); August 12-26, 2024 (trial); September 9 - October 7, 2024 (trials)
7. Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one)
a. days (specify number): 10
b. hours (short causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e. Email address: g. Party represented:
Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
9. Preference
This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the
processes available through the court and community programs in this case.
(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified
in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
(1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
statutory limit.
(2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
(3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
California Rule of Court 3.811(b)(8)
Page 2 of 5
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal, et al. 22-CIV-04323
10. c. In the table below, indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to
participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR
processes (check all that apply): stipulation):
Mediation session not yet scheduled
Mediation session scheduled for (date):
(1) Mediation
Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
Mediation completed on (date): November 20, 2023
Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
Settlement conference completed on (date):
Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
(3) Neutral evaluation
Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
Private arbitration completed on (date):
ADR session not yet scheduled
ADR session scheduled for (date):
(6) Other (specify):
Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
Page 3 of 5
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 22-CIV-04323
Jean Audrey Beal, et al.
11. Insurance
a. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: Yes No
c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
12. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
Bankruptcy Other (specify):
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b. A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party):
14. Bifurcation
The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
16. Discovery
a. The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
Plaintiffs Written Discovery June 30, 2024
Plaintiffs Depositions July 31, 2024
Plaintiffs Expert Disovery Per Code
c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):
Page 4 of 5
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 22-CIV-04323
Jean Audrey Beal, et al.
17. Economic litigation
a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $35,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
18. Other issues
The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify):
19. Meet and confer
a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 1
I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: April 4, 2024
Michael J. Vroman
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
Additional signatures are attached.
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5
MC-025
CASE NUMBER:
SHORT TITLE:
Case Management Statement in Bogdis et al v. Beal Et al 22-CIV-04323
ATTACHMENT (Number): 1
(This Attachment may be used with any Judicial Council form.)
(If the item that this Attachment concerns is made under penalty of perjury, all statements in this Page of
Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.)
(Add pages as required)
Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California ATTACHMENT www.courtinfo.ca.gov
MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] to Judicial Council Form
Preview
CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER: FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: Vikranth Sunderraj Esp (SBN 225636) Michael Vroman (SBN 247763) FIRM NAME: Tenant Law Group STREET ADDRESS: 1000 Pine Street, Ste 1250 CITY: San Francisco STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 94111 TELEPHONE NO.: (888)510-7511 FAX NO.: (888)376-1662 EMAIL ADDRESS: info@tenantlawgroupsf.com ATTORNEY FOR (name): Plaintiffs Jennifer Bogdis and Peter Bogdis SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Mateo STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center MAILING ADDRESS: 400 County Center CITY AND ZIP CODE: Redwood City, CA 94063 BRANCH NAME: Hall of Justice and Records PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bodgis, et.al DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal et. al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 22-CIV-04323 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $35,000 exceeds $35,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: April 8, 2024 Time: 9:00 Dept.: 23 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Vroman INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Jennifer Bogdis and Peter Bogdis 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 17, 2022 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Complaint for (1) Breach of Warranty of Habitability; (2) Breach of Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment; (3) Negligence; (4) Constructive Eviction; (5) Violation of California Civil Code 789.3; (6) Violation of California Civil Code 1940.2 Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] www.courts.ca.gov CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER: 22-CIV-04323 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings; if equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief): Plaintiffs were tenants at 804 S. Idaho St, San Mateo, CA 94402, a residential property owner or managed by defendants until December 1, 2021. Trhoughout Plainitffs tenancy, Defendants faildd to remedy substantial habitability defets and dangerous conditions at the property notwithstanding Plaintiffs complaints. Plaintiffs seek economic damages, non-economic damages (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): Jun 3-July 8 2024 (trials); July 15-22 2024 (trial); August 12-26, 2024 (trial); September 9 - October 7, 2024 (trials) 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one) a. days (specify number): 10 b. hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. Email address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. (3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): California Rule of Court 3.811(b)(8) Page 2 of 5 CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jean Audrey Beal, et al. 22-CIV-04323 10. c. In the table below, indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): November 20, 2023 Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): Page 3 of 5 CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 22-CIV-04323 Jean Audrey Beal, et al. 11. Insurance a. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date Plaintiffs Written Discovery June 30, 2024 Plaintiffs Depositions July 31, 2024 Plaintiffs Expert Disovery Per Code c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): Page 4 of 5 CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jennifer Bogdis, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 22-CIV-04323 Jean Audrey Beal, et al. 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $35,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 1 I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: April 4, 2024 Michael J. Vroman (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 MC-025 CASE NUMBER: SHORT TITLE: Case Management Statement in Bogdis et al v. Beal Et al 22-CIV-04323 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 (This Attachment may be used with any Judicial Council form.) (If the item that this Attachment concerns is made under penalty of perjury, all statements in this Page of Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) (Add pages as required) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California ATTACHMENT www.courtinfo.ca.gov MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] to Judicial Council Form