arrow left
arrow right
  • Hannah Bocker, Sarah Bocker, Barbara Bocker as Administrator of the Estate of Gerard Bocker and Barbara Bocker Individually v. Hergin Aviation Inc., Knipping-Diaz And Associates Inc., Cessna Aircraft Corporation d/b/a n/k/a Textron Aviation Inc., Hartzell Engine Components Inc., Hartzell Engine Technologies, Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc. f/k/a Continental Motors, Inc., Southtecaviation Llc, Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Holdings, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Llc, Pine Mountain Aviation, Llc, John Does 1-10Torts - Product Liability (airplane) document preview
  • Hannah Bocker, Sarah Bocker, Barbara Bocker as Administrator of the Estate of Gerard Bocker and Barbara Bocker Individually v. Hergin Aviation Inc., Knipping-Diaz And Associates Inc., Cessna Aircraft Corporation d/b/a n/k/a Textron Aviation Inc., Hartzell Engine Components Inc., Hartzell Engine Technologies, Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc. f/k/a Continental Motors, Inc., Southtecaviation Llc, Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Holdings, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Llc, Pine Mountain Aviation, Llc, John Does 1-10Torts - Product Liability (airplane) document preview
  • Hannah Bocker, Sarah Bocker, Barbara Bocker as Administrator of the Estate of Gerard Bocker and Barbara Bocker Individually v. Hergin Aviation Inc., Knipping-Diaz And Associates Inc., Cessna Aircraft Corporation d/b/a n/k/a Textron Aviation Inc., Hartzell Engine Components Inc., Hartzell Engine Technologies, Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc. f/k/a Continental Motors, Inc., Southtecaviation Llc, Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Holdings, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Llc, Pine Mountain Aviation, Llc, John Does 1-10Torts - Product Liability (airplane) document preview
  • Hannah Bocker, Sarah Bocker, Barbara Bocker as Administrator of the Estate of Gerard Bocker and Barbara Bocker Individually v. Hergin Aviation Inc., Knipping-Diaz And Associates Inc., Cessna Aircraft Corporation d/b/a n/k/a Textron Aviation Inc., Hartzell Engine Components Inc., Hartzell Engine Technologies, Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc. f/k/a Continental Motors, Inc., Southtecaviation Llc, Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Holdings, Inc., Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Llc, Pine Mountain Aviation, Llc, John Does 1-10Torts - Product Liability (airplane) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 03/29/2024 01:02 PM INDEX NO. 2021-53475 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 357 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/29/2024 Connell Foley LLP Samantha M. Diorio 875 Third Avenue Associate 21st Floor SDIORIO@CONNELLFOLEY.COM New York, NY 10022 P 212.307.3700 F 212.542.3790 March 29, 2024 VIA ECF Honorable Thomas R. Davis, J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Re: Hannah Bocker, et al. v. Hergin Aviation, et al. Index No.: 2021-53475 CF File No.: 12160/135900 Dear Judge Davis: We represent Defendant Hartzell Engine Technologies LLC (“HET”) in the above referenced matter. In accordance with Your Honor’s March 11th Order, please accept this letter brief in renewed support of HET’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Complaint as to HET (Motion Sequence No. 3), pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(8), together with such other relief as this Court may deem just, proper, and equitable. We note that HET and Plaintiffs are diligently working towards reaching a resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims brought in Delaware and in this matter. HET renews and relies upon all of the arguments, affidavits, and exhibits set forth it in its original papers – including but not limited to the Memorandum of Law and Affirmation in Support. HET is not subject to either general or specific personal jurisdiction in New York. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ claims against HET must be dismissed. In accordance with Your Honor’s June 13, 2023 Order (NYSECF Doc. No. 220), HET provided additional paper discovery and produced Keith Bagley, President of HET, for a deposition. Both the paper discovery and Mr. Bagley’s deposition sought to address the specific points raised in the June 13, 2023 Order. It is HET’s position that the additional discovery and Mr. Bagley’s deposition established that: (1) SkyGeek is not an HET distributor and has no relationship – contractual, formal, or informal – with HET; (2) HET does not have an exclusive distributor agreement with any entity regarding its turbochargers; and (3) HET did not conduct any business in New York related to Plaintiffs’ claims brought against HET. For the reasons set forth it in its original motion papers, and incorporating the jurisdictional discovery conducted, HET is not subject to either general or specific personal jurisdiction in New York. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ claims against HET must be dismissed. 15123342-1 1 of 2 FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 03/29/2024 01:02 PM INDEX NO. 2021-53475 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 357 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/29/2024 Hannah Bocker, et al. v. Hergin Aviation, et al. March 29, 2024 Page 2 We thank the Court for its consideration of this matter. Respectfully Submitted, Samantha M. Diorio SMD/smd CC: All Counsel of Record via NYSECF 15123342-1 2 of 2