On August 12, 2021 a
Letter,Correspondence
was filed
involving a dispute between
Barbara Bocker
As Administrator Of The Estate Of Gerard Bocker And Barbara Bocker Individually,
Hannah Bocker,
Sarah Bocker,
and
Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc.,
Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Llc,
Berkshire Aviation Holdings, Inc.,
Cessna Aircraft Corporation
D B A N K A Textron Aviation Inc.,
Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc.
F K A Continental Motors, Inc.,
Hartzell Engine Components Inc.,
Hartzell Engine Technologies,
Hergin Aviation Inc.,
John Does
1-10,
Knipping-Diaz And Associates Inc.,
Pine Mountain Aviation, Llc,
Southtecaviation Llc,
for Torts - Product Liability (airplane)
in the District Court of Dutchess County.
Preview
FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 03/29/2024 01:02 PM INDEX NO. 2021-53475
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 357 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/29/2024
Connell Foley LLP Samantha M. Diorio
875 Third Avenue Associate
21st Floor SDIORIO@CONNELLFOLEY.COM
New York, NY 10022
P 212.307.3700 F 212.542.3790
March 29, 2024
VIA ECF
Honorable Thomas R. Davis, J.S.C.
New York State Supreme Court
Dutchess County Supreme Court
10 Market Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
Re: Hannah Bocker, et al. v. Hergin Aviation, et al.
Index No.: 2021-53475
CF File No.: 12160/135900
Dear Judge Davis:
We represent Defendant Hartzell Engine Technologies LLC (“HET”) in the above
referenced matter. In accordance with Your Honor’s March 11th Order, please accept this letter
brief in renewed support of HET’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Complaint as to HET (Motion
Sequence No. 3), pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(8), together with such other relief as this Court may
deem just, proper, and equitable. We note that HET and Plaintiffs are diligently working towards
reaching a resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims brought in Delaware and in this matter.
HET renews and relies upon all of the arguments, affidavits, and exhibits set forth it in its
original papers – including but not limited to the Memorandum of Law and Affirmation in Support.
HET is not subject to either general or specific personal jurisdiction in New York. Therefore,
Plaintiffs’ claims against HET must be dismissed.
In accordance with Your Honor’s June 13, 2023 Order (NYSECF Doc. No. 220), HET
provided additional paper discovery and produced Keith Bagley, President of HET, for a
deposition. Both the paper discovery and Mr. Bagley’s deposition sought to address the specific
points raised in the June 13, 2023 Order. It is HET’s position that the additional discovery and Mr.
Bagley’s deposition established that: (1) SkyGeek is not an HET distributor and has no
relationship – contractual, formal, or informal – with HET; (2) HET does not have an exclusive
distributor agreement with any entity regarding its turbochargers; and (3) HET did not conduct
any business in New York related to Plaintiffs’ claims brought against HET.
For the reasons set forth it in its original motion papers, and incorporating the jurisdictional
discovery conducted, HET is not subject to either general or specific personal jurisdiction in New
York. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ claims against HET must be dismissed.
15123342-1
1 of 2
FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 03/29/2024 01:02 PM INDEX NO. 2021-53475
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 357 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/29/2024
Hannah Bocker, et al. v. Hergin Aviation, et al.
March 29, 2024
Page 2
We thank the Court for its consideration of this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
Samantha M. Diorio
SMD/smd
CC: All Counsel of Record via NYSECF
15123342-1
2 of 2