arrow left
arrow right
  • Velocity Capital Group Llc v. Superior Drywall Builders Llc, Francisco Javier PicadoCommercial - Contract document preview
  • Velocity Capital Group Llc v. Superior Drywall Builders Llc, Francisco Javier PicadoCommercial - Contract document preview
  • Velocity Capital Group Llc v. Superior Drywall Builders Llc, Francisco Javier PicadoCommercial - Contract document preview
  • Velocity Capital Group Llc v. Superior Drywall Builders Llc, Francisco Javier PicadoCommercial - Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

INDEX NO. 508481/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X VELOCITY CAPITAL GROUP LLC, Index No. 508481/2024 Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE - against - SUPERIOR DRYWALL BUILDERS LLC and FRANCISCO JAVIER PICADO, Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X GENE W. ROSEN, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York, affirms the following under the penalties of perjury: I am a Member of Gene Rosen’s Law Firm – A Professional Corporation, attorneys for Plaintiff, and am not a party to this action. On MARCH 26, 2024, I served copies of the SUMMONS AND VERIFIED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING WITH INDEX NUMBER AND FILING DATE ENDORSED THEREON upon SUPERIOR DRYWALL BUILDERS LLC by certified mail, by depositing same in a sealed envelope with postage paid certified mail wrapper in an official depository under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of New York designated for that purpose, addressed to: Superior Drywall Builders LLC 770 West 56th Street Hialeah, FL 33012 Tracking # 7022 1670 0001 1647 1320 This method of service is authorized by the parties’ contract, a copy of which is annexed as Exhibit “A” to the complaint. The Appellate Division has ruled that service of process by mail in accordance with a written agreement is proper and reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the pendency of the lawsuit. Matter of New York Merchants Protective Co., Inc. v. Mima’s Kitchen, Inc., 114 A.D. 3d 796 (2nd Dept., 2014); Matter of Fernandez (Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.), 130 A.D. 2d 657 (2nd Dept., 1987). Dated: Garden City, New York March 26, 2024 GENE ROSEN’S LAW FIRM A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff By: _______________________________ Gene W. Rosen, Esq. 200 Garden City Plaza, Suite 405 Garden City, New York 11530 Tel (212) 529-3600 Ext. 101 Fax (347) 578-8793 Gene@GeneRosen.com 1 of 2 INDEX NO. 508481/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2024 2 of 2