arrow left
arrow right
  • TAPIA -v- AMAZON.COM, INC. et al Print Other Employment Unlimited  document preview
  • TAPIA -v- AMAZON.COM, INC. et al Print Other Employment Unlimited  document preview
  • TAPIA -v- AMAZON.COM, INC. et al Print Other Employment Unlimited  document preview
  • TAPIA -v- AMAZON.COM, INC. et al Print Other Employment Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ELECTRONICALLY FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT Peter Lazarus (SBN 128055) 2/14/2024 5:31 PM Brian Angelini (SBN 234072) Gaspar Ambriz Medina, DEPUTY By: PACIFIC ATTORNEY GROUP 856 South Robertson Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90035 Tel: (310) 659-6000 Fax: (310) 659-4000 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CRISTINA TAPIA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CIVSBZ405575 CRISTINA TAPIA, Case No. lO Plaintiff, UNLIMITED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: ll V. 1. SEXUAL HARASSMENT (HOSTILE 12 AMAZON.COM,INC., AKA AMAZON; WORK ENVIRONMENT) UNDER CAL. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC; and FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING l3 DOES 1 t0 20, inclusive, ACT (“FEHA”); . SEXUAL HARASSMENT (QUID PRO l4 QUO) UNDER FEHA; Defendants. . SEXUAL HARASSMENT DIRECTED 15 AT OTHERS (HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT) l6 . FAILURE TO PREVENT HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION; l7 VvvvvvvvVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV . UNFAIR, UNLAWFUL, FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICES (CAL. BUS. & 18 PROF. CODE § 17200 ET SEQ); AND . RETALIATION; l9 . WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF FEHA; and 20 . WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY. 21 DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, CRISTINA TAPIA, and for causes of action against the defendants and each of them, alleges as follows: JURISDICTION 1. This Court is the proper court, and this action is properly filed in San Bernardino County, because defendants’ obligations and liability arise therein, because Plaintiff and defendants reside in San Bernardino, because defendants maintain offices and transact business within San Bernardino County, and because the work that is the subj ect 0f this action was performed by Plaintiff in San Bernardino County. lO PARTIES ll 2. Plaintiff, CRISTINA TAPIA (hereinafter referred t0 as “Plaintiff” 0r “TAPIA”) is and 12 l3 was at all times relevant hereto a resident 0f San Bernardino County, State 0f California. l4 3. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times herein, Defendant 15 AMAZON.COM, INC. AKA AMAZON (hereinafter referred t0 as “AMAZON”), is an l6 unknown business entity doing and transacting business Within San Bemardino County, State of l7 California. 18 l9 4. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times herein, Defendant 20 AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC (hereinafter referred t0 as “LLC”), is a corporation doing 21 and transacting business within San Bernardino County, State 0f California. 22 5. A11 named defendants in paragraphs 3 through 4, inclusive, are collectively referred t0 23 herein as “Defendants.” 24 25 6. Defendants are Plaintiffs employer within the meaning 0f Cal. Government Code 26 Sections 12926, subdivision (d), 12940, and 12950, and California Labor Code Sects. 200 et 27 seq., and regularly employ five (5) or more persons and is therefore subj ect t0 the jurisdiction of 28 this Court. 2 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES