arrow left
arrow right
  • *MF* Frias -v- Himnel USA Incorporated et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • *MF* Frias -v- Himnel USA Incorporated et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • *MF* Frias -v- Himnel USA Incorporated et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • *MF* Frias -v- Himnel USA Incorporated et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

’\ F WTERDR C3... i .. V ur‘ D CALIFORLHA kWN COUNTY OF SAN dSRNARDINO SAN BERNARDm’: WMCT ‘ DEC 8 2023 OWNOUI Bv—GKW SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 11 NORMA FRIAS, CASE NO.: CIVSB2314042 12 Plaintiff, [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Michael A. Sachs Dpt. 828] 13 VS. 14 HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED, a California WOrder] DENYING DEFENDANT Corporation, HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED’S MOTION 15 DBA ST. MARY’S MONTESSORI SCHOOL, a TO CONSOLIDATE CASE NOS. California Corporation, and DOES 1-20, CIVSBZ314471(HERNANDEZ) AND 16 Inclusive, CIVSBZ314929 (ROBLES) WITH FRIAS AND DESIGNATING CASE NO. CIVSBZSI4042 AS 17 Defendants. “LEAD CASE” PURSUANT TO C.C.P §1048, AND CAL. RULE OF COURT 3.300 AND 3.350 18 19 Hearing Date: December 12, 2023 20 Time: 8:30 a.m. Location: Department Dpt. $28 21 22 Complaint filed: June 21, 2023 Discovery Cutoff: None Set 23 Trail Date: None Set 24 25 26 27 28 1 Wrder] DENYING DEFENDANT HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ORDER Defendant Himnel USA Incorporated’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Consolidate Case Nos. CIVSBZ314471(HERNANDEZ) and CIVSBZ314929 (ROBLES) with Frias and Designating Case NO. CIVSBZ3 14042 as “Lead Case” Pursuant t0 C.C.P §1048, and Cal. Rule of Court 3.300 and 3.350 \OOONGU‘I#UJN’—- (“Motion”), brought against Plaintiff Norma Frias (“Plaintifi”) came for regular hearing on December l2, 2023, in Department $28 of the above-captioned Court. Having considered Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Opposition, Defendant’s Reply, evidence filed in support thereof, and oral argument presented to this Court in support of the parties' positions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is denied in its entirety. Dated; nEc 03 2023 WML- Honorable §Mchael A. Sachs Superior C urt Judge NNNNNNNNNb—nb—‘u—‘u—aflr—n—‘r—np—nn—n WNQU’IAWNHOWWQOM#WNHC 2 [Proposed Order] DENYING DEFENDANT HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE