arrow left
arrow right
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
  • JULIAN TORRES, III VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCAll Other Civil Cases (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 11/28/2023 3:20 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Rachel Bueno CAUSE NO. C-4368-23-H JULIAN TORRES III, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff, § § v. § 398TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § GENERAL MOTORS LLC, § § Defendant. § HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS GENERAL MOTORS LLC’S SPECIAL EXCEPTION, ORIGINAL ANSWER AND GENERAL DENIAL COMES NOW General Motors LLC (“GM”) and files this, its Special Exception, Original Answer and General Denial, and for such would respectfully show the Court as follows: I. Special Exception GM objects and specially excepts to Plaintiff’s attempt to invoke a Level 2 Discovery Control Plan in this case pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 190.3 in paragraph 1 of Plaintiff’s Original Petition. This case should be governed by a Level 3 Discovery Control Plan under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 190.4 and GM prays the Court to so rule. II. General Denial GM invokes the provisions of Rule 92, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and hereby exercises its legal right to require Plaintiff to prove all of the allegations contained in their live pleadings, if Plaintiff can so prove them, which are denied. Accordingly, GM denies generally the allegations of Plaintiff’s pleadings and demands strict proof thereof by a preponderance of the evidence. Electronically Filed 11/28/2023 3:20 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Rachel Bueno III. Prayer WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, GM prays the Court that upon trial hereof Plaintiff recover nothing and that GM recovers costs and such other and further relief as it may show itself entitled to receive. Respectfully submitted, Beatty Navarre Strama PC 901 South Mopac Expressway Building 1, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78746 (512) 879-5050 (512) 879-5040 (FAX) By: ___/s/ Matthew R. Beatty ____ Matthew R. Beatty State Bar No. 24001169 mbeatty@bnsfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS LLC Electronically Filed 11/28/2023 3:20 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Rachel Bueno CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been served via the Court’s electronic filing system to all counsel listed below on November 28, 2023: John D. Barker Krohn & Moss, Ltd. 10 N. Dearborn St., 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 578-9428 (866) 289-0898 (FAX) SBN: 24072753 jbarker@consumerlawcenter.com /s/ Matthew R. Beatty Matthew R. Beatty Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Katelynn Looney on behalf of Matthew Beatty Bar No. 24001169 klooney@bnsfirm.com Envelope ID: 82018191 Filing Code Description: Answer/Response Filing Description: GM Original Answer Status as of 11/28/2023 3:38 PM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status John D.Barker jbarker@consumerlawcenter.com 11/28/2023 3:20:03 PM SENT Matthew R.Beatty mbeatty@bnsfirm.com 11/28/2023 3:20:03 PM SENT