arrow left
arrow right
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
  • Greg Pasalich v. Samuel Macintyre, Property-Owners Insurance CompanyCT - Civil Tort document preview
						
                                

Preview

CIRCUIT AND SUPERIOR COURTS 38TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA GREG PASALICH, CAUSE N0. 02D03-2111-CT-597 )))))))))) Plaintiff, VS. SAMUEL MACINTYRE and PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. DISCLOSURE Jennifer L. DeGroote, Judge of Allen Superior Court 3, is now the presiding judge in this case. It has come to the Court’s attention that this disclosure needs to be made on the record in this case regarding how Judge DeGroote may not be seen as impartial and the parties need to be advised of this issue. Judge DeGroote needs to advise the parties of the following: 1) Counsel for Property-Owners Insurance Company are attorneys with the law firm Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros, LLP (hereinafier “HSK”). i 2) Timothy W. DeGroote is, at present, the managing partner of HSK. 3) Timothy W. DeGroote is the spouse of Judge Jennifer L. DeGroote. 4) Timothy W. DeGroote is not presently acting, nor has he ever acted, as a lawyer in this proceeding. 5) Pr0perty-0wners Insurance Company is not a specific client of Timothy W. DeGroote. 6) The Court does not find Timothy W. DeGroote’s interest as a partner in HSK to be substantially affected by this proceeding. Judge DeGroote believes she can put aside the existence of a professional relationship between her spouse and attorneys of record in this case from HSK and still be fair and impartial. Judge DeGroote also understands that any of the patties may not see it that way and she will disqualify herself, unless she is asked to remain in the case. The Court understands that a disqualification will create delay and frustration that the parties may wish to avoid. Judge DeGroote is required to provide the parties the opportunity to discuss this with their counsel to determine if parties wish to waive this issue and move forward. With this Disclosure, the Court will provide a waiver form the parties will need to complete and file with the court within thirty (30) days of filing of this Disclosure. If any party does not agree to the waiver, parties may submit a stipulation for appointment of special judge within thirty (30) days. If, afier thirty (3 O) days, not all waivers have been filed and no stipulation for appointment of a special judge has been filed, selection of a special judge will be through appointment by the Clerk in accordance with LR02-TR79-23. DATED: December 6 2021 Jennifer Groote Judge Allen S erior Court 3 CIRCUIT AND SUPERIOR COURTS 38TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA GREG PASALICH, ) CAUSE No. 02D03-2111-CT-597 Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SAMUEL MACINTYRE and ) PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) Defendants. ) ) WAIVER 0F CONFLICT l understand that am entitled to an unbiased. impartial, and speedyjudgment | of my case. I understand that. by signing this form, I agree to waive any potential conflict of the judge in this case. | understand that by waiving a conflict. lgive up my right to file a motion for a change ofjudge based upon this conflict. lunderstand that lgive upthe right to challenge anyjudgment in this case on appeal on the basis that thejudge should have removed herself because of this conflict. lswear that lhave received a complete disclosure on the record pf thejudge's possible conflict of interest under Rule 2.11. l swear that l have had the opportunity to discuss this possible conflict and this waiver with my attorney. if represented, and the opposing attorney, or party. l swear that l have voluntarily agreed to sign this waiver. lswear no party or attorney has coerced me to sign this document. Isign this form freely and voluntarily and with full understanding, orI have permitted my attorney to sign this form as my agent. l understand. affirm, and intend that this waiver is voluntary, made with full knowledge, and is a binding decision on my part that is to become part of the record in this case. lswearthat, as a self-represented litigant, lhave voluntarily chosen not to review this matter with counsel. [have read, or have had read to me, this form as applicable to my case. If l have an attorney. I have discussed each item with my attorney. By signing, lam indicating that l understand and agree with each item stated. l understand the rights outlined above, and knowingly waive those rights. | Party Sig nature: Date: lam the attorney of record for the [Plaintiff/Defendant]. Ihave reviewed this form with my client, explained each item, and have answered all of my client‘é questions. |have fully explained the nature ofjudicial conflict and the consequences of this waiver. lagree andjoin in my client's waiver. Attorney Signature: Date: [have read, or have had read to me, this form as applicable. lf l have an attorney, l have discussed each item with my attorney. By signing. lam indicating that | understand and agree with each item stated. understand the rights outlined above, | and lknowingly waive those rights. Party Signature: Date: lam the attorney of record for the [Plaintiff/Defendant]. lhave reviewed this form with my client. explained each item, and have answered all of my client's questions. lhave fully explained the nature ofjudicial conflict and the consequences of this waiver. lagree andjoin in my client's waiver. Attorney Signature: Date: