arrow left
arrow right
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • CHRISTIE RUIZ VS. SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., VICTOR BAHKTA, GENX HOSPITALITY, LLC, VIKAS B. BHAKTA, MIGUEL JASSO, INTRINSIC HOSPITALITY, LLC, INTERIA HOSPITALITYInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 5/10/2018 3:29 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Patricia Molina CAUSE NO. C-0594-18-D Christie Ruiz § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § VS. § 206TH JUDICIAL COURT § Super 8 Worlwide, Inc, Victor § HIDALGO COUNTY, TX Bahkta, Genx Hospitality, LLC, § Vikas B. Bhakta § DOCKET CONTROL ORDER BE IT REMEMBERED that on 10th day of May, 2018 a Docket Control Conference was scheduled in the above entitled and numbered cause. Appearances were made by: Norma for Hon. Ed Chapa for Plaintiff Hon. Darren E. Ticer for Defendant The following was ordered by the Court: A. January 10, 2019 First Pre-Trial at 8:30 A.M. B. February 28, 2019 Final Pre-Trial at 8:30 A.M. C. March 4, 2019 Trial on the Merits at 9:00 A.M. D. February 4, 2019 Plaintiff's and Defendant's deadline for completion of all discovery including supplementation E. January 28, 2019 Plaintiff's deadline for supplemental and amended pleading February 4, 2019 Defendant's deadline for supplemental and amended pleadings. F. December 4, 2018 Plaintiff's and Defendant's deadline for joinder of additional parties G. December 19, 2018 Plaintiff's deadline for Designation of Experts and TRCP 194.2(f) information. January 18, 2019 Defendant's deadline for Designation of Experts and TRCP 194.c(f) information. H. October 31, 2018 Deadline to file Motions for Summary Judgment. Electronically Filed 5/10/2018 3:29 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Patricia Molina I. February 27, 2019 Deadline to file Joint Pre-Trial order approved as to form by all attorneys. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER) J. February 28, 2019 Deadline to file any Daubert/Robinson motion challenge or objection no later than 8:30 a.m. K. THIS IS MANDATORY Mediation is hereby ordered to be conducted no later than thirty days before the trial date and no later than the final pre-trial date if so extended by agreement of all parties before the trial date and certainly by the final pre-trial date. L. The case is estimated to last 3-4 days M. The case is set before a Jury trial N. Miscellaneous 1. All motions needing a hearing and/or submission date, shall include an Order Setting Hearing/ Submission. If no notice of setting is received by Movant, then Movant shall contact the District Clerk's Office to ensure the Order Setting Hearing/Submission was attached to the motion and taken to the court. 2. The Joint Pre-Trial Agreement shall include a proposed Jury Charge in Microsoft Word format (single spaced), if the case will be a jury trial. 3. All parties shall confer amongst themselves on Motions in Limine prior to the date of trial. On the morning of trial, the Court will make a ruling on the Motions in Limine that are agreed on and those not agreed will be addressed by the Court. 4. Any motions needing to be addressed by the Court at the time fo the First Pre-Trial and Final Pre-Trial hearings SHALL be filed no later than the MONDAY before said hearing. Said mtions shall include an Order Setting Hearing to be set by the Court on the First and/or Final Pre-Trial hearings. If the motion is not set by the court, then the Motion will not be set at the time fo the First and/or Final Pre-Trial Hearings. 5. Parties shall confer prior to the date of trial on depostions excerpts and shall provide to the court no later than the Final Pre-Trial date any deposition excerpts with objections that need rulings. Electronically Filed 5/10/2018 3:29 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Patricia Molina At this time fo this order and by written agreement of the parties in compliance with T.R.C.P. 11, we have no conflict in our schedules. 5/11/2018 SIGNED on this _______day of ____________________,2018 ___________________________ Judge Rose G. Reyna RGR/mf Hon. Ed Chapa edchapa@bonilla-chapalaw.com Hon. Darren E. Ticer dticer.atty@bushramirez.com Electronically Filed 5/10/2018 3:29 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Patricia Molina CAUSE NO. _____________________ ___________________ § IN THE DISTRICT COURT ___________________ § PLAINTIFF(S) § § vs. § 206TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § ___________________ § ___________________ § DEFENDANT(S) § § HIDALGO COUNTY,TEXAS JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Hidalgo County Local Rules of Court, the Parties shall prepare and file with the clerks of the Court a Joint Pretrial Order. The Joint Pretrial Order shall be signed by the Parties or their attorneys of record and filed with the clerks 1 day prior to the Final Pretrial Conference scheduled by the Court. The Joint Pretrial Orders shall contain the information set forth below. 1 A list of the name of all the Parties, whether represented or Pro Se, and the Names, Bar Numbers, Addresses and Telephone Numbers of all counsel. 2 A list of all pending motions by the Parties, including motions in limine. The Parties shall state which motions require a hearing by the court. If no motions are pending, the Parties are to so state. 3 A statement as to the status of discovery or that discovery is completed. 4 A list of all witnesses to be called at trial by the Parties and a brief statement as to the matter of their testimony. 5 A list of all exhibits expected to be offered at trial. Each party shall make Electronically Filed 5/10/2018 3:29 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Patricia Molina the exhibits available for examination by opposing counsel. If there is a disagreement as to the authenticity or admissibility of any of the exhibits, the Parties shall notify the court at or prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. 6 Each party shall attach a proposed jury charge including instructions, definitions and questions to the Joint Pretrial Order. 7 A statement by each party as to the approximate number of days for trial and any special scheduling difficulties of Counsel, Parties or Witnesses. 8 A short statement on the status of settlement negotiations and the outcome of mediation conference. All exhibits are to be pre-marked with inadmissible matters redacted prior to trial. Page and line designation for video taped deposition excerpts shall be exchanged by the parties prior to trial. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of exhibits, witnesses or denial of motions. Failure to review exhibits tendered by the opposing party and lodge objections may result in a waiver of those objections.