Motion,Ex Parte: Davis -v- Redlands Unified School District et al Print

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                AARVIG @3 ASSOCIATES, APC
              Attorneys at    Law
      650 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 250
         San Bemardino, CA 92408
             (909) 307-0026
       (909) 307-0255 (Facsimile)
     Maria K. Aarvig, Esq. - Bar No. 146671

     Attorneys for Defendant,      REDLANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
QQ



                            SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

               SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY — SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER

10
     PERRY DAVIS,                                                                       CASE NO. CIVSB2103756
11
                               Plaintifi‘,                                               Judge Jay   H   Robinson
12                                                                                      DEPT. 835
     v.
13
                                                                                        Complaint     Filed:   1/ 1   9/2021
14   REDLANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
     et al.                                                           vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
                                                                                        Trial Date:     March   11,    2024
15

                               Defendant.                                               DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN
16
                                                                                        LIMINE #5 TO PRECLUDE
17                                                                                      EVIDENCE OF NEWSPAPER
                                                                                        ARTICLES
18

19


20

21
              Defendant    REDLANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT moves this court for an order
     before voir dire examination to preclude the plaintiff and his counsel from making reference to
22
     newspaper      articles written   about the   plaintiff.   Such evidence does not                     constitute admissible
23

     evidence, has no probative value, and serves no purpose other than to prejudice the defense and
24
     confuse the jury.
25
              This motion seeks to prevent reference to this evidence in voir                              dire,      opening statement, or
26
     solicitation   of them during examination of the witnesses.
27
              This motion    is further   based upon the accompanying                          Memorandum of Points and
28



                                                                -1-

                                DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE #5
               TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF NEWS APER ARTICLES REGARDING THE PLAINTIFF
     Authorities, all of the papers   and records on file herein, and upon such other oral and

     documentaxy evidence as may be presented       at the hearing   of this motion.




     DATED:      [W          q   ,
                                     2024                     AARVIG 6“ ASSOCIATES, APC


                                                     By:
                                                              flimflv
                                                              MARIA K. AARVIG,         ESQ.
                                                              Anomey     for Defendant,
                                                              REDLANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL
                                                              DISTRICT


10

11


12


13


14


15


16

17


18

19


20

21


22

23

24

25

26

27

28



                                                        -2-

                                DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE #5
               TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF NEWS APER ARTICLES REGARDING THE PLAINTIFF