arrow left
arrow right
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
  • Denise Winns v. The City Of New York, New York City Health And Hospital Corporation, Helen Ortega, Michael Millinek, Juan Checo, Tanya Moore, Sixto ValentinTorts - Other - City (Hostile Work Environment) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2023 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 701440/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO.: DENISE WINNS, 701440/2023 PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF, SECOND AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT (Further to efiled, 9-5-23, 220PM, Order of Honorable Tracy Catapano-Fox, J.S.C., Document #52, mandating service of Plaintiff Second Amended Complaint, no later than 30 days from 9-1-23 order) THE CITY OF NEW YORK ; NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION ; HELEN ORTEGA; MICHAEL MILLINEK; JUAN CHECO; TANYA MOORE; SIXTO VALENTIN; DEFENDANTS. _____ _ _ _ __-_________________________________...-- _____________Ç The plaintiff, by and through her attorney Gary S. Fish, Esq., sets forth the following as her Second Amended Complaint herein, further to the above Court Order. AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: (HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT, VIOLATION OF SECTION 296 OF NEW YORK EXECUTIVE LAW, PLAINTIFF against DEFENDANTS) 1. From on or about 3-2022, , up to and including June 6, 2023, and up to and including the present, plaintiff was and is employed as a hospital police sergeant, Division 6, Elmhurst Hospital, Elmhurst, Queens, NY by defendant NYCHHC which exercised dominion, possession, and/or control over defendant Helen Ortega, on information -1- 1 of 13 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2023 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 701440/2023 b.II"" A 4 w 4 1W NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2023 and belief Chief Executive and/or Officer, over defendant Michael Millinek. on information and belief, a Chief Operating Officer (COO). and over defendant Sixto Valentin, Captain, , and over defendant Tanya Moore, Chiet each of the named defendants at all times herein, relevant herein, acted in a managerial eapacity and/or authorized and/or directed and/or ratified each ofthe below described acts of wrongdoing, which were all committed within the scope of and/or agency authority and/or employment on behalf of defendant NYCHHC, and/or defendant The City of New York, which also expressly and/or ratified each impliedly below described act of wrongdoing herein. 2 At all times relevant herein, on or about March and 2022, including June and 6, 2023, up to and including1he present. plaintiff belonged to a protected as an class, African-American Female, and each act of wrongdoing herein after described was substantially motivated by racially discriminatory and/or gender bias and animus against the plaintiff herein. 3- The defendants, and each of them, from on or about March and 2022, June 6, including 2023, and up to and the including present , and at all times relevant herein, up to and including the present, created and/or maintained and/or irnplemented and/or engaged in a hostile, and/or harassing and/or and/or degrading retaliatory work environment directed against the plaintift without any bona fide occupational qualification and/or purpose and/or whhout just cause und/or without business justification, in one or more of the following ways. in that: (a) defendant Chief Tanya Moore, and/or Detec6ve Yagual at the direction and/or instruction of defendant Chief Tanya Moore, installed cameras outside the women's locker room at Elmhurst Ilospital for the purpose of conducting surveillance of without just cause plaintiff, any and/or business justification for existing same, which conduct was and/or expressly impliedly ratified -2- 2 of 13 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2023 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 701440/2023 ...h.IL + d Fr '4un- NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2023 by the above mentioned managerial officers and/or agents affiliated with Elmhurst IIospital and which surveillartee cameras were not installed outside the men's locker room. and therefore constituted a hostile gender biased work environment against the female plaintiftl defendant (b) Chief Tanya Moore confiscated plaintiff's personal property, including her police memo book. without notice and an opportunity to be heard, and thereby substantially engaged in conduct detrimental to police functions and plaintifTro exposing foreseeable loss of evidence and/or witnesses, and further plaintiff exposing to foreseeably and/or criminal disciplinary sanctions. for being v ithout her police rnemo book; ( e ) defendant Chief Tanya Moore, ordered plaintiff, from on or about June July 2022, up to 6, 2023, and to and the up including present, to work, midnight night shifts, resulting in loss of benefits and overtime to and her, therefore engaged in disparate discriminatory treatment of plaintiff. as other insolitr male officers. who had less seniority than did not have plaintitL to work such shifts: and defendant Chief Tanya (d) Moore, while plaintiff was off duty, made disparaging comments about her attire and/or grey shirts, although there existed no just cause and/or business justification for same. 4. The aforesaid conduct was egregious, wanton, willful, and/or oppressive, was calculated to and did result in loss of property rights to the plaintiff,and the defendants are liable 16r punitive and damages as a result exegnplary thereof. defendants" 5. As a result of hostile work environment against plaintiff, which was substantial, and/or continuous and/or ratified by the defendants herein. plaintiff was caused to sustain and will sustain loss of earnings , and/or loss of which will earning capacity, long continue, loss of work promotional opportunities. and incurred and will incur reasonable attorney fees and costs, -3- 3 of 13 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2023 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 701440/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2023 6. As a ofdefendants' result hostile work environment against plaintiff, plaintiff was caused to sustain increased blood pressure, lost consciousness while sustained working, emotional pain and suffering, which w) long continue, sustained injuries to heads, neck, back, and body, and also incurred hospital, medical and medical-related expenses. 7. Plaintiff (then claimant) timely and served properly personally a notice of claim on Office of Corp. Counsel City of New York, on gNovember 10, 202, at 348PM. and also timely and served a properly notice of claim on the relevant parties. acknowledged as Claim #2022LEO33417, and Claim #2022LEO32489. 8. Plaintiff(then claimant) 50-h was held and hearing completed on 1-1 I-23, and plaintiff has fulfilled and any all conditions precedent to bringing the subject lawsuit herein. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: (INTENTlONAL INFLICTION OF SEVERE EMOTIONAL D.[STRESS) 9. Plaintiff herewith repeats. restates and realleges Paragraphs l-8 herein above, 10. The aforesaid conduct by defendants, and each of them, was outrageous, beyond all bounds of moral and/or probity civility and/or righteousness, was calculated to and did result in plaintiff sustaining severe emotional and distress, defendants are liable for intentional infliction of severe emotional distress as result thereof. 11. The aforesaid conduct of defendants was wanton, egregious, opprobrious, was calculated to and did result in 10ss of plaintiff s and property rights, defendants are liable for punitive and exemplary damages as a result thereof. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: (INVASION OF PFUVACY) 12. Plaintiff herewith repeats, restates and realleges Paragraphs 1-I 1 herein above. -4- 4 of 13 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2023 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 701440/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2023 13. From on or about March 2022, up to and including February 2023, and to up and June including 6, 2023, and to and up including the defendant presem, Chief Tanya Moore went into plaintiff's locker.. and took and/or damaged her laptop computer, refi·igerator, and filing cabinets, without justification and/or good cause for same. 14. The aforesaid conduct was egregious. wanton, opprobrious. and defendants, and each of them, are liable for punitive and exemplaiy damages as a result thereof. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: (CONVERSTON) 15. Plaintiff herewith repeats. restates and realleges Paragraphs