arrow left
arrow right
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
  • HAMER, CHRISTOPHER J. Et Al v. BYRNE, MARIANP90 - Property - All other document preview
						
                                

Preview

SCHEDULING ORDER For information on ADA STATE OF CONNECTICUT S JD-CV-71 Rev. 9-23 accommodations, contact the JUDICIAL BRANCH &% Centralized ADA Office at 860-706-5310 SUPERIOR COURT Qype or go to: www, it. -GovIADA! www.jud.ct.gov Rear Sy COURT USE ONLY SCHORD Instructions HUT 1. Complete all sections, sign. and file with the court. 2. Attach an additional page if more space is needed for either section. ‘Addr ui t (Number, street, town and zip code) Conference date (if known) Docket number 123 Hoyt Street, Stamford, CT 06905 FST-CV23-6061385-S Naine of case (Plaintiffv. Defendant) Christopher J. Hamer, et al. v. Marian Byrne Alternate Dispute Resolution Have the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR), including judicial mediation (J-ADR), binding arbitration, and private mediation? Yes [2]No Are all parties willing to refer the case to private ADR? Oo Yes No Are there reasons why this case should be referred to the Complex Litigation Docket (CLD)? CO Yes [2]No {n non-jury cases, are the parties willing to try the case before an Attorney Trial Referee (an altomey designated to submit factual-findings to the court)? 0 Yes Ly]No In jury cases, are the parties willing to try the case (with a jury) before a Judge Trial Referee (a judge who is 70 years or older designated to hear certain cases)? [x] Yes * {J No * Hon.Robert Genuario. assigned to this case. Discovery Order 4 . File Certificate of Closed Pleadings (JD-CV-11) by (date): 03/15/2024 2. Exchange written discovery requests by (date): 03/01/2024 3, Exchange responses to discovery requests by (date): 05/01/2024 4. File dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment, by (date): 5. Dispositive motion responses filed by (date): 6. . Dispositive motions marked ready on the short calendar no tater than (date): (must be scheduled on the short calendar at least 120 days before trial) 7. Disclose: Plaintiffs experts by (date): 06/01/2024 Defendant's experts by (date): 08/01/2024 8. . Complete depositions of: Piaintiff's fact witnesses by (date): 10/15/2024 Defendant's fact witnesses by (date): 10/15/2024 Plaintiffs experts by (date): 07/15/2024 Defendant's experts by (date): 09/15/2024 9. For jury cases only: The verdict will likely be [“] more than $50,000 (J less than $50,000 10, Finish Independent Medical Exam(s) (I.M.E.) by (date): N/A 11, Motion to consolidate with the case named below to be filed by (date): NIA Docket number Name of case to consolidate with (Plaintif v. Defendant) 12. Case will be ready for a meaningful settlement conference on (date): October 1, 2024 13. Other discovery or scheduling orders: 14. List 3 dates when ail parties are available to start the trial: 1. 10/28/2024 2. 11/05/2024 3. 11/12/2024 * See Attached re trial dates 15. A pretrial conference will be held on or about (date): 11/15/2024 16. If case is privileged under Connecticut Practice Book Section 14-9, specify the basis of privilege: Page 1 of 2 Agreement Name of Atlomey/Sell-epresented party Name of Attomney/Seil-represented parly Edward N. Lerner, Esq. for the Plaintiffs Name of Aiiorney/Sel-represented parly Name of Atiomey/Sell-represented parly Isl Alan Spirer, Esq. for Defendant Name of Allomey/Sell-represented party Name of Atlorney/Sell-represented parly Name of Ailorney/Sellvrepresented party Name of Attorney/Sell-represented party | certify that this proposed order has been agreed to Signed “tan” party) by all counsel and self-represented parties of record. oN Failure to comply with these orders may result in sanctions. A Motion for Continuance (JD-CV-21) must be filed if the parties are seeking to change a scheduled event. The parties may modify the scheduling order for expert witnesses by agreement, unless otherwise ordered by the court. The parties must file a Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order to change any other dates. When dates are modified, a revised scheduling order must be filed with the court. Certification | certify that a copy of this document was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or non-electronically on (date) 01/23/2024 to all attorneys and self-represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from all attorneys and self-represented parties of record who received or will immediately be receiving electronic delivery. Name and address of each party and attorney that copy was or will be mailed or delivered to* Alan Spirer, Esq. 830 Post Road East P.O. Box 5201 Westport, CT 06881 Email: arspirer@yahoo.com Wwyv™~ Signed (Signature of filer Print or type name of person signing Date signed > EDWARD N. LERNER, ESQ. 01/23/2024 Page 2 of 2 Re: DOCKET NO.: FST-CV23-6061385-S PLAINTIFFS ATTACHMENT TO THE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant contends that this trial should await the disposition of the Appeal matter concerning Civil Case Docket No. FST-CV20-6047674-S, that is in the briefing stage before the Appellate Court. The Plaintiffs strongly disagree with delaying the trial date.