arrow left
arrow right
  • Ali Baba Hotel Corp. d/b/a AMSTERDAM COURT HOTEL, East Side Inn L.L.C. d/b/a THE MARCEL AT GRAMERCY v. Alexander Prose, Rehan Kapadia, Bella Mandoki, Carlos Carrillo, Thalia Herrera Commercial - Other (Breach of Agreement) document preview
  • Ali Baba Hotel Corp. d/b/a AMSTERDAM COURT HOTEL, East Side Inn L.L.C. d/b/a THE MARCEL AT GRAMERCY v. Alexander Prose, Rehan Kapadia, Bella Mandoki, Carlos Carrillo, Thalia Herrera Commercial - Other (Breach of Agreement) document preview
  • Ali Baba Hotel Corp. d/b/a AMSTERDAM COURT HOTEL, East Side Inn L.L.C. d/b/a THE MARCEL AT GRAMERCY v. Alexander Prose, Rehan Kapadia, Bella Mandoki, Carlos Carrillo, Thalia Herrera Commercial - Other (Breach of Agreement) document preview
  • Ali Baba Hotel Corp. d/b/a AMSTERDAM COURT HOTEL, East Side Inn L.L.C. d/b/a THE MARCEL AT GRAMERCY v. Alexander Prose, Rehan Kapadia, Bella Mandoki, Carlos Carrillo, Thalia Herrera Commercial - Other (Breach of Agreement) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No. 150993/2022 ALI BABA HOTEL CORP. et. al Appearance No. 005 -VS- TAS Part 42 PROSE, ALEXANDER et. al STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER On December 21 20_23 a conference was held in this case. The parties appeared as follows: Ali Baba Hotel Corp. Belkin Burden Goldman, LLP Plaintiff(s) by East Side Inn L.L.C. Belkin Burden Goldman, LLP by by Defendant(s) Alexander Prose b Leon Behar Esq Rehan Kapadia by Pro Se’ Bella Mandoki, Carlos Carril! Pro Se’ bi The Court has considered the status of this case [and determined that the Court's order of October 12 20 23 has not been complied with in that ] Defendants Carrillo, Mandoki, Kapadia and Herrera have failed to produce any documents despite multiple prior Court Orders. Moreover, Carrillo, Mandoki, Kapadia, and Herrera have refuse to answer deposition questions based on objections of "relevance" and "harassment"-despite multiple prior Court Orders. Defendant Prose's deposition commenced but was adjourned. Plaintiff's deposition has been adjourned on consent to January. it is ORDERED that Defendant Alexander Prose's deposition and Plaintiff's deposition shall be completed Accordingly, by January 31, 2024 at a time and place to be agreed upon by counsel. Plaintiff's are granted leave of Court to file a motion seeking discovery sanctions pursuant to CPLR 3126 based on the Defendants ongoing, wilful non-compliance with this Court's various Orders. Page 1 of 2 STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER Index No, 150993/2022 Case Absent good cause shown, any discovery issues not raised herein will be deemed waived. All dispositive motions must be filed within days of the note of issue. Failure to comply with these directives may result in the imposition of costs or sanctions including dismissal or default judgment. Dates set forth may not be extended or adjourned except with advance approval of the Court. SC: NOI: SO ORDERED: Dated: Page 2 of 2