On June 20, 2023 a
Opposition to Motion filed Electronically - Opposition to Motion To Strike
was filed
involving a dispute between
Moreno, Manuel,
and
Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Inland Empire Utilities Agency,
Lee, Randy,
Lening, Scott,
for Other Employment Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ 3 12097 ELECTRONICALLY FIL ED (Auto)
LAW OFFICE 0F NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
\IARDINO
26636 Margarita Road, suite 101 fgflgggggg’gw/IBER'
'
Murrieta, CA 92563
Tel: (951) 708-1497
Fax: (951) 905-1632
Email: nancyrose@nrhlawoffice.com
KOOOQONUI-RUJNH
Attorney for Plaintiff, MANUEL MORENO
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
MANUEL MORENO, an individual; Case No. CIVSB23 141 11
Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF, MANUEL MORENO’S,
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, RANDY
vs. LEE’S, NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION TO STRIKE; MEMORANDUM
INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY, a OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
public entity; RANDY LEE, an individual; SUPPORT THEREOF
SCOTT LENING, an individual; DOES 1
through 50, inclusive; Date: December 14, 2023
Time: 8:30 am.
Defendant(s). Dept: S-23
NNNNNNNNNr—dr—Ar—Ar—‘r—tr—dr—Ar—tr—dr—A
Complaint Filed 06/20/2023
OOQQUI-bUJNi—‘OKOOOQONUl-PUJNF—‘O
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff, MANUEL MORENO (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff'), hereby opposes the
Motion t0 Strike t0 Plaintiff” s Complaint (“Complaint”) of Defendant, RANDY LEE
(hereinafter, “DEFENDANT LEE”).
This Opposition is based upon Defendant’s failure to show how the pleading, 0r any of
the alleged matters therein, are irrelevant, false, improper 0r not drawn in conformity with the
laws of this state or in conformity With a court rule or order as mandated by Code 0f Civil
Case N0. CIVSB23 141 11
1 MANUEL MORENO’S, OPPOSITION
PLAINTIFF,
TO DEFENDANT, RANDY LEE’S, NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
LAW OFFICE OF IN SUPPORT THEREOF
NANCYROSE
HERNANDEZ
1
Procedure sections 435 and 436. In the alternative, should the court find that the Plaintiff’ s
2 ComP laint fails t0 state a claim for relief, the court should grant leave t0 amend.
3
This Opposition is based upon the complete files and records in this action, the following
4
Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and upon any documentary and/or oral evidence as may
5
be presented at the time 0f the hearing 0f the Motion.
6
7
8
9
10
11 Dated: November 30, 2023 LAW OFFICE OF NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ
12
13 By: /s/ Nancyrose Hernandez
Nancyrose Hernandez
1 4
Attorney for Plaintiff,
15
MANUEL MORENO
16
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CIVSB2314111
2 MANUEL MORENO’S, OPPOSITION
PLAINTIFF,
T0 DEFENDANT, RANDY LEE’S, NOTICE 0F
MOTION AND MOTION T0 STRIKE;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
LAW OFFICE 0F IN SUPPORT THEREOF
Document Filed Date
December 01, 2023
Case Filing Date
June 20, 2023
Category
Other Employment Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ 3 12097 ELECTRONICALLY FIL ED (Auto) LAW OFFICE 0F NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA \IARDINO 26636 Margarita Road, suite 101 fgflgggggg’gw/IBER' ' Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: (951) 708-1497 Fax: (951) 905-1632 Email: nancyrose@nrhlawoffice.com KOOOQONUI-RUJNH Attorney for Plaintiff, MANUEL MORENO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO MANUEL MORENO, an individual; Case No. CIVSB23 141 11 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF, MANUEL MORENO’S, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, RANDY vs. LEE’S, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE; MEMORANDUM INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY, a OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN public entity; RANDY LEE, an individual; SUPPORT THEREOF SCOTT LENING, an individual; DOES 1 through 50, inclusive; Date: December 14, 2023 Time: 8:30 am. Defendant(s). Dept: S-23 NNNNNNNNNr—dr—Ar—Ar—‘r—tr—dr—Ar—tr—dr—A Complaint Filed 06/20/2023 OOQQUI-bUJNi—‘OKOOOQONUl-PUJNF—‘O TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff, MANUEL MORENO (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff'), hereby opposes the Motion t0 Strike t0 Plaintiff” s Complaint (“Complaint”) of Defendant, RANDY LEE (hereinafter, “DEFENDANT LEE”). This Opposition is based upon Defendant’s failure to show how the pleading, 0r any of the alleged matters therein, are irrelevant, false, improper 0r not drawn in conformity with the laws of this state or in conformity With a court rule or order as mandated by Code 0f Civil Case N0. CIVSB23 141 11 1 MANUEL MORENO’S, OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF, TO DEFENDANT, RANDY LEE’S, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES LAW OFFICE OF IN SUPPORT THEREOF NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ 1 Procedure sections 435 and 436. In the alternative, should the court find that the Plaintiff’ s 2 ComP laint fails t0 state a claim for relief, the court should grant leave t0 amend. 3 This Opposition is based upon the complete files and records in this action, the following 4 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and upon any documentary and/or oral evidence as may 5 be presented at the time 0f the hearing 0f the Motion. 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: November 30, 2023 LAW OFFICE OF NANCYROSE HERNANDEZ 12 13 By: /s/ Nancyrose Hernandez Nancyrose Hernandez 1 4 Attorney for Plaintiff, 15 MANUEL MORENO 16 17 1 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CIVSB2314111 2 MANUEL MORENO’S, OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF, T0 DEFENDANT, RANDY LEE’S, NOTICE 0F MOTION AND MOTION T0 STRIKE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES LAW OFFICE 0F IN SUPPORT THEREOF