arrow left
arrow right
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Holmes Karen Vs Ahmed ShihabAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 1 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 Firm Code: H21 File No.: 181376222 Cooper Maren Nitsberg Voss & DeCoursey Christine Mercado-Spies, Esq. Bar #: 013702006 485 Route 1 South, Building A, Suite 200 Iselin, NJ 08830 Ph: 732-362-3400; Direct dial: (732) 734-3287 Fax: (866) 827-4716 Attorneys for Defendants, Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY KAREN D. HOLMES, LAW DIVISION CAMDEN COUNTY Plaintiff, DOCKET NO.: CAM-L-1949-20 v. CIVIL ACTION SHIHAB AHMED, MOHAMMED F. AHMED, et al., ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL, Defendants. REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF DAMAGES, DEMAND FOR ANSWERS TO FORM AND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES AND JURY DEMAND Defendants, Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed, by way of answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff, Karen Holmes, say: FIRST COUNT 1. Neither admitted nor denied, and plaintiff is left to his proofs. 2. Neither admitted nor denied, and plaintiff is left to his proofs. 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. Denied. WHEREFORE, Defendants demand dismissal of the Complaint, together with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. SECOND COUNT 1. The defendant incorporates by reference the responses made to the to the preceding Count. CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 2 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 2. Denied. 3. Denied. 4. Denied. WHEREFORE, Defendants demand dismissal of the Complaint, together with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. THIRD COUNT 1. The defendant incorporates by reference the responses made to the to the preceding Count. 2. To the extent that the allegations of this paragraph are directed to the defendant, same are denied. WHEREFORE, Defendants demand dismissal of the Complaint, together with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. FOURTH COUNT 1. The defendant incorporates by reference the responses made to the to the preceding Count. WHEREFORE, Defendants demand dismissal of the Complaint, together with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. The Defendants violated no duty owing to the Plaintiff and were not negligent. 2. Any and all injuries or damages alleged to have been suffered by the Plaintiff was caused solely by the negligence of the Plaintiff. 3. Any and all injuries or damages alleged to have been suffered by the Plaintiff was the result of the contributory/comparative negligence of the Plaintiff, and should be reduced accordingly. CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 3 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 4. The claims asserted are barred or otherwise diminished by the negligence of the Plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of the New Jersey Comparative Negligence Act. 5. The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against the Defendants pursuant to the provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act. 6. Any and all injuries or damages alleged to have been suffered by the Plaintiff was solely by the negligence of independent third parties over whom the Defendants exercised no control, and are not otherwise vicariously liable. 7. Defendants were confronted by a sudden emergency and/or unavoidable accident, and acted reasonably under the circumstances. 8. This action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 9. Plaintiff has failed to set forth a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. 10. Plaintiff has failed to meet the verbal threshold as set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8. 11. Plaintiff has failed to mitigate damages. 12. Plaintiff's failure to wear a seatbelt is the proximate cause of Plaintiff's alleged injuries. 13. The Court lacks jurisdiction over this Defendant. 14. The Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. 15. Plaintiff failed to issue the summons within ten (10) days after the filing of the Complaint as set forth in R. 4:4-1 and accordingly, the Complaint should be dismissed. 16. Venue in this jurisdiction is improper. 17. Plaintiff’s action is barred by the entire controversy doctrine. 18. Plaintiff’s action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. 19. Plaintiff’s action is barred by the doctrines of collateral and equitable estoppel. 20. Plaintiff’s Complaint is barred by the doctrine of accord and satisfaction. 21. Plaintiff’s Complaint is barred by prior Settlement and Release. CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 4 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 22. Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed for failure to name a necessary party. 23. Plaintiff has failed to properly effect service upon this Defendant. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 4:6-1(d) WE HEREBY CERTIFY that the within pleading was served within the period of time allowed under the Rules of this Court. REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF AMOUNT OF DAMAGES CLAIMED Pursuant to Rule 4:5-2, you are hereby requested to submit to the undersigned, within 5 days after service hereof upon you, a statement of the amount of the damages claimed by you in each Count of the Complaint, in the captioned matter. DEMAND FOR ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendants demands answers to Form “A” Interrogatories, together with answers to Supplemental Interrogatories, from the Plaintiff under oath within the time prescribed by the Rules of this Court. DEMAND FOR HIPAA AUTHORIZATIONS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendants demands signed HIPAA authorizations for all treating providers pursuant to Rule 4:17-4(f). JURY DEMAND Defendants hereby demand a trial by jury of six persons as to all issues. DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4:25-4, notice is hereby given that Christine Mercado- Spies, Esquire is counsel designated to try the captioned case on behalf of Defendants, Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed. CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certifies as follows: CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 5 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 1. That to the best of my knowledge and belief this matter in controversy is not the subject of any of other action pending in any Court or of a pending Arbitration proceeding, nor is any such proceeding contemplated at this time by the answering Defendants, Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed. 2. That to the best of my knowledge and belief there are no other parties who may be joined in this action. COOPER MAREN NITSBERG VOSS & DECOURSEY Attorneys for Defendants, Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed Dated: July 30, 2020 __________________________________________ Christine Mercado-Spies, Esq. CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 6 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 Appendix XII-B1 CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT FOR USE BY CLERK'S OFFICE ONLY (CIS) Use for initial Law Division PAYMENT TYPE: CK CG CA Civil Part Pleadings (not motions) under Rule 4:5–1. CHG/CK NO. Pleading will be rejected for filing, under Rule 1:5-6(c), AMOUNT: if information above the black bar is not completed OVERPAYMENT: or if attorney's signature is not affixed. BATCH NUMBER: ATTORNEY/PRO SE NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER COUNTY OF VENUE Christine Mercado-Spies, Esq. 732-362-3400 CAMDEN FIRM NAME (If applicable) DOCKET NUMBER (When available) Cooper Maren Nitsberg Voss & DeCoursey CAM-L-1949-20 OFFICE ADDRESS DOCUMENT TYPE 485 Route 1 South, Building A, Suite 200 ANSWER Iselin, NJ 08830 JURY DEMAND YES  NO NAME OF PARTY (e.g., John Doe, Plaintiff) CAPTION Mohammed F. Ahmed and Shihab Ahmed, Defendants Karen D. Holmes vs. Shihab Ahmed; Mohammed F. Ahmed; et al CASE TYPE NUMBER HURRICANE SANDY (See reverse side for listing) IS THIS A PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE CASE?  YES NO RELATED? 603Y IF YOU HAVE CHECKED "YES," SEE N.J.S.A.2A:53A-27 AND APPLICABLE CASE LAW  YES NO REGARDING YOUR OBLIGATION TO FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT. RELATED CASES PENDING? IF YES, LIST DOCKET NUMBERS  YES NO DO YOU ANTICIPATE ADDING NAME OF DEFENDANT'S PRIMARY INSURANCE COMPANY, IF KNOWN ANY PARTIES (arising out of Progressive Insurance Company  NONE  UNKNOWN same transaction or occurrence)?  YES NO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM CANNOT BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE. CASE CHARACTERISTICS FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING IF CASE IS APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION DO PARTIES HAVE A CURRENT, PAST OR IF YES, IS THAT RELATIONSHIP RECURRENT RELATIONSHIP?  EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE  FRIEND/NEIGHBOR  OTHER (explain) YES NO  FAMILIAL  BUSINESS DOES THE STATUTE GOVERNING THIS CASE PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF FEES BY THE LOSING PARTY?  YES NO USE THIS SPACE TO ALERT THE COURT TO ANY SPECIAL CASE CHARACTERISTICS THAT MAY WARRANT INDIVIDUAL MANAGEMENT OR ACCELERATED DISPOSITION: N/A DO YOU OR YOUR CLIENT NEED ANY DISABILITY ACCOMMODATIONS? IF YES, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE REQUESTED ACCOMMODATION:  YES NO WILL AN INTERPRETER BE NEEDED? IF YES, FOR WHAT LANGUAGE?  YES NO I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been redacted from documents now submitted to the court, and will be redacted from all documents submitted in the future in accordance with Rule 1:38-7(b) ATTORNEY SIGNATURE Effective 06/05/2017, CN 10517-English Page 1 - 2 CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 7 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 Side 2 CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT (CIS) Use for initial pleadings (not motions) under Rule 4:5-1 CASE TYPES (Choose one and enter number of case type in appropriate space on the reverse side.) Track I -- 150 days' discovery 151 NAME CHANGE 175 FORFEITURE 302 TENANCY 399 REAL PROPERTY (other than Tenancy, Contract, Condemnation, Complex Commercial or Construction) 502 BOOK ACCOUNT (debt collection matters only) 505 OTHER INSURANCE CLAIM (INCLUDING DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTIONS) 506 PIP COVERAGE 510 UM or UIM COVERAGE (coverage issues only) 511 ACTION ON NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT 512 LEMON LAW 801 SUMMARY ACTION 802 OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (SUMMARY ACTION) 999 OTHER (Briefly describe nature of action) Track II -- 300 days' discovery 305 CONSTRUCTION 509 EMPLOYMENT (other than CEPA or LAD) 599 CONTRACT/COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION 603N AUTO NEGLIGENCE - PERSONAL INJURY (non-verbal threshold) 603Y AUTO NEGLIGENCE - PERSONAL INJURY (verbal threshold) 605 PERSONAL INJURY 610 AUTO NEGLIGENCE - PROPERTY DAMAGE 621 UM or UIM CLAIM (includes bodily injury) 699 TORT – OTHER Track III -- 450 days' discovery 005 CIVIL RIGHTS 301 CONDEMNATION 602 ASSAULT AND BATTERY 604 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE 606 PRODUCT LIABILITY 607 PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE 608 TOXIC TORT 609 DEFAMATION 616 WHISTLEBLOWER/CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT (CEPA) CASES 617 INVERSE CONDEMNATION 618 LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (LAD) CASES Track IV -- Active Case Management by Individual Judge / 450 days' discovery 156 ENVIRONMENTAL/ENVIRONMENTAL COVERAGE LITIGATION 303 MT. LAUREL 508 COMPLEX COMMERCIAL 513 COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION 514 INSURANCE FRAUD 620 FALSE CLAIMS ACT 701 ACTIONS IN LIEU OF PREROGATIVE WRIT Multicounty Litigation (Track IV) 271 ACCUTANE/ISOTRETINOIN 289 REGLAN 274 RISPERDAL/SEROQUEL/ZYPREXA 290 POMPTON LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION 278 ZOMETA/AREDIA 291 PELVIC MESH/GYNECARE 279 GADOLINIUM 292 PELVIC MESH/BARD 281 BRISTOL-MYER SQUIBB ENVIRONMENTAL 293 DEPUY ASR HIP IMPLANT LITIGATION 282 FOSAMAX 295 ALLODERM REGENERATIVE TISSUE MATRIX 285 STRYKER TRIDENT HIP IMPLANTS 296 STRYKER REJUVENATE/ABG II MODULAR HIP STEM COMPONENTS 286 LEVAQUIN 297 MIRENA CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE 287 YAZ/YASMIN/OCELLA 601 ASBESTOS 288 PRUDENTIAL TORT LITIGATION 623 PROPECIA 299 OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL MEDICATIONS/BENICAR 300 TALC BASED BODY POWDERS 624 STRYKER LFIT CoCr V40 FEMORAL HEADS If you believe this case requires a track other than that provided above, please indicate the reason on Side 1, in the space under "Case Characteristics." Please check of each applicable category:  Putative Class Action:  Title 59 Effective 06/05/2017, CN 10517-English Page 2-2 CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:18 PM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 4 Pages SCANNED Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:45:29 GMT CAM-L-001949-20 07/30/2020 3:29:19 PM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV20201322667 Civil Case Information Statement Case Details: CAMDEN | Civil Part Docket# L-001949-20 Case Caption: HOLMES KAREN VS AHMED SHIHAB Case Type: AUTO NEGLIGENCE-PERSONAL INJURY (VERBAL Case Initiation Date: 06/08/2020 THRESHOLD) Attorney Name: CHRISTINE MARIE MERCADO-SPIES Document Type: Answer Firm Name: COOPER MAREN NITSBERG VOSS A Jury Demand: YES - 6 JURORS DECOURS Is this a professional malpractice case? NO Address: 485 ROUTE 1 SOUTH BLDG A STE 200 Related cases pending: NO ISELIN NJ 08830 If yes, list docket numbers: Phone: 7323623400 Do you anticipate adding any parties (arising out of same Name of Party: DEFENDANT : AHMED, MOHAMMED transaction or occurrence)? NO Name of Defendant’s Primary Insurance Company (if known): Progressive Garden State Insurance Company Are sexual abuse claims alleged by: KAREN HOLMES? NO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM CANNOT BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE CASE CHARACTERISTICS FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING IF CASE IS APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION Do parties have a current, past, or recurrent relationship? NO If yes, is that relationship: Does the statute governing this case provide for payment of fees by the losing party? NO Use this space to alert the court to any special case characteristics that may warrant individual management or accelerated disposition: Do you or your client need any disability accommodations? NO If yes, please identify the requested accommodation: Will an interpreter be needed? NO If yes, for what language: Please check off each applicable category: Putative Class Action? NO Title 59? NO Consumer Fraud? NO I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been redacted from documents now submitted to the court, and will be redacted from all documents submitted in the future in accordance with Rule 1:38-7(b) 07/30/2020 /s/ CHRISTINE MARIE MERCADO-SPIES Dated Signed