Preview
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE „I JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
CI 1.....,
IN AND FOR Ilf1/4126 COUNTY -icc-, - :
.... '
is
.....,
CX:.
P.. ..'
STATE OF FLORIDA C .) rn
C3
.:.....,.m nc
c-i --4 c)
_..........
c.,. "11 IN..)
~a 1r1
a
aya
Defendant,
tatj1:
.
91 CI
r; -
3:". 70
(-)
-1:1N.).. .
=
...... .
r-r- 1
e) c ..
...41. ...
CASE NO: ..C IV
STATE OF FLORIDA
Respondent, CI-DL
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS F.S. 79.01
FOR DISMISSAL OF INDICTMENT/INFORMATION
AND CHARGE NO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
1. This Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus F.S. 79.01, for dismissal of
Indictment/Information and charge no subject matter jurisdiction State of Florida
F.S. 944.17(5)(d). There was no Probable Cause Affidavit filed on Defendant at
arrests on the / ,45.> which makes his arrest illegal: false arrest,
false imprisonment, and wrongful incarceration.
2. The Florida Depai inent of Corrections under F.S. 944.17(5)(d) F.D.O.C.
shall refuse to accept a person into the correctional system unless there is a
Probable Cause Affidavit in his prison file, and at Central Office, Tallahassee,
Florida.
3. The fact that Fla. Stat. 944.17(5)(d), states FDOC shall refuse to accept any
person into the correctional system unless the following documents are presented
in completed form, and 944.17(5)(d) specifically states a copy of the Probable
Cause Affidavit for each identified in the current Indictment/Information the
conviction is not attacked. It should be null and void because the defendant's due
process of the law was violated thus was falsely arrested and convicted.
4. The Court does have jurisdiction as Defendant is itetained in Miami-Dade
County and the Court is bias and refuses to do the right thing and grant Writ of
-Habeas Corpus. Newly- discovered is just that newly discovered evidence Fla. R.
Crim. Proc. 3.220 in the county of 0&/2/1/4.
5. Defendant invokes jurisdiction under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.600(3). Newly
discovered evidence, new, and material evidence which if introduced at the trial
would have changed the verdict, or finding of the Court. Also, the Defendant could
not with due diligence have discovered, or produced at the trial, has now been
discovered. Also on each new charge Defendant is to be Mirandized [sic]. See
Miranda v. Arizona on additional charges upon arrest.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.133 Probable Cause Affidavit, determination and
adversary preliminary hearing, F.S. 901.12 (1968); Escobe Doud Illinois, 378 U.S.
478, 87 Supreme Court L. Ed. 20 973 (1967). 1972 Amendment the ABA
Standards on pre-trial release provided for a person arrested to be taken before a
committing Magistrate.
2
Fla. Stat. 944.17(5)(d), Alvarez v. State, 157 Fla. 254 25 So. 20, 661; 1946
Lex-718 (No# in original) April 5. 1946.
7. In an Information be amended in a matter of substance, such Information
should be re-signed by the county solicitor (ASA), and re-sworn to him and re-
ified with the clerk. Further, the defendant should be re-arraigned, should re-plea
and the jury should be re-selected and re-sworn upon the new issues joined.
8. Mace-Proof, vb. To be exempt from an arrest: To be secure against an arrest.
9. Audita Querela (law Latin "The Complaint having been heard.") A Writ
available to a judgment debtor who seeks a re-hearing of a matter on grounds of
newly discovered evidence, or newly existing legal defenses. (Cases: Audita
Querela). "The Writ of Audita Querela- (Querela having been heard) ... Introduced
during the time of Edward III, was available to re-open a judgment in certain
circumstances. It was issued as a remedy to defendant where an important matter
concerning his case had arisen since the judgment. Its issue was based on
equitable, rather than common law principles." L.B. Corzon, English legal history
103 (2nd Ed. 1979).
Every time it's amended in order to I.D. him — as the accused to formally
charge him before the record. See Landrum v. State, 247 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Sup. Court
1971). Albritton v. State, 948 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2007) (Jan 31st, 2007) 38
Fla. Law Weekly D1891 - D1892.
3
Wherefore, Defendant demonstrates his constitutional right to the 4th and
14th Amendments of the United States Constitution be upheld, and order
Defendant's charges dropped, and his immediate released from an illegal custody.
x4-1
/b
Submitted this trlday 4,11/ 01) , 202 .
6/eA--
ae,--2\- 4-At-cakoa-i
.1pfae660Z
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document has been placed in prison officials hands for mailing via U.S. Mail to:
Clerk of Court, tidal/44 iorAi) stimi/ato 440144/fifiiv t.eviv)
F.D.O.C. Secretary, 501 South Calhoun Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 on this
/7 ay of Pt , 2023. S CCM all 07 A.1 ty M /0490 0
Z121111k4)4fiffi: WI)
44 1)6 61dd
Everglades Correctional Institution
1599 S.W. 187th Avenue
Miami, Florida 33194
4
go (web a1114, b'ayeAliCW44 2 MIAMI FL 330
reg 0, /2 am /t, d4/7 MAILED
FROM
,rgov
quadient
FIRST-CLASS MAIL 4141.
atim IMI
CORRECTIONAL r. .1 $000.63 2 0
11/20/2023 ZIP 33194 co
INSITUTE 043M31229203
C di 0,(4.,41beef
ue7wzd
fl dt gz-e.
PgAtid. f'614,--ah .31-/YeZYI M'
Ze . d/4/Yeb,4